Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
Author Message
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 18,085
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 857
I Root For: California
Location: IV, V, VI, IX
Post: #1
Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
Article in The Athletic today about the sorry state of the Cleveland Indians' finances and their ownership situation:

The Indians’ future in Cleveland: Relocation questions, ownership status, payroll and more in the spotlight

Apparently there is no imminent threat to move the franchise, and the majority ownership is local. But attendance is very bad and the payroll scrapes the bottom of MLB.
Quote:Cleveland is the 19th-largest media market in the country, per Nielsen, and the smallest to field an MLB, NFL and NBA team. Pittsburgh, the 26th-largest market, does have MLB, NFL and NHL representation. The Pirates and Indians own MLB’s two lowest payrolls.
Quote:“The biggest lever,” a source said, “is still and always will be winning. … In reality, (the front office is) operating as well as any human being could ever operate. The danger, or if you’re looking for a warning, is the fact that they’re operating that way and still haven’t drawn that many people. That’s not a criticism of Cleveland. It’s a reflection of the size of the market.

"The size of the market." There's the big problem for MLB owners: There are no can't-miss markets to move to. Cleveland's market is too small? Oops -- it's a larger media market than every possible relocation or expansion market.

Nielsen market sizes for the largest markets without MLB:

Orlando -- 1,731,360 households with TV
Sacramento -- 1,459,260

Portland (OR) -- 1,315,470
Charlotte -- 1,290,660
Raleigh/Durham -- 1,237,230

Indianapolis -- 1,182,500
Nashville -- 1,102,340
Salt Lake City -- 1,100,260
San Antonio -- 1,031,180
Hartford/New Haven -- 1,002,710

Columbus (OH) -- 999,300
Greenville -- 940,000
Austin -- 912,400
West Palm Beach -- 870,720
Las Vegas -- 833,510

Grand Rapids -- 781,080
Harrisburg (PA) -- 772,810
Jacksonville -- 756,960
Oklahoma City -- 755,340
Birmingham -- 730,440

Norfolk -- 725,580
Greensboro -- 717,110
Albuquerque/Santa Fe -- 716,800
Louisville -- 696,070
New Orleans -- 663,520

Memphis -- 619,610
Providence -- 619,140
Buffalo -- 612,780
Ft. Myers/Naples -- 608,640
Fresno/Visalia -- 607,200

Orlando and Sacramento are in italics because they're not possible candidates as long as the Rays and A's are where they are. The Rays could conceivably move to Orlando, or the A's could conceivably move to Sacramento, but otherwise those markets aren't candidates. Columbus is also not realistic with the Indians and Reds already in Ohio, maybe unless the Indians move there, but that doesn't seem to be an option. Many of the other markets listed above are also too close to current MLB clubs to ever get approved as either relocation or expansion cities.

So when an established market like Cleveland that already has a solid MLB ballpark is "too small" to support three "major" pro franchises, the realistic options (or threats) are very limited. Many of the smaller-than-Cleveland markets listed above already have at least one "major" franchise, and some already have two.
07-12-2021 03:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 3,502
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 202
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: :uoᴉʇɐɔo⌉
Post: #2
RE: Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
MLB really needs to institute minimum and maximum payrolls. It'll probably never happen, but it would be good for the sport.
07-12-2021 04:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,666
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 300
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Top of Mt Rushmore
Post: #3
RE: Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
Supporting an MLB team is a lot tougher than supporting the NFL, NBA, NHL, or MLS. There’s 81 home games and many of them are on weeknights. It takes a lot of support and a large population to fill seats under those circumstances.

If management/ownership is a dumpster fire and the on field product isn’t great, it’s tough to command support in your market.

MLB keeps talking expansion, when truth be told, there’s a lot of struggling franchises out there. Relocation to smaller markets is NOT the answer. There might be a short burst of enthusiasm in the new town but the small market teams are going to have similar struggles.
07-12-2021 08:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AllTideUp Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,293
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 242
I Root For: Alabama
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
I've said for a long time that part of the problem with baseball is that there's too much of it. They have too many games and they literally go at it everyday.

Part of the reason football is more popular is because it's more scarce. There's excitement in anticipating the coming big game and you don't have to dedicate nearly as much time.

The scarcity also ups the importance of each game.
07-12-2021 09:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


dbackjon Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,070
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 321
I Root For: NAU/Illini
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
(07-12-2021 04:36 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  MLB really needs to institute minimum and maximum payrolls. It'll probably never happen, but it would be good for the sport.

Yup - with greater revenue sharing.
07-13-2021 11:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 18,085
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 857
I Root For: California
Location: IV, V, VI, IX
Post: #6
RE: Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
(07-13-2021 11:47 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  
(07-12-2021 04:36 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  MLB really needs to institute minimum and maximum payrolls. It'll probably never happen, but it would be good for the sport.

Yup - with greater revenue sharing.

The minimums would have to be really high in order to justify more revenue sharing; otherwise low-spending team owners will just keep pocketing the revenue sharing money rather than paying for a payroll at or near the MLB median.

Cleveland is a good example. The Indians have the lowest payroll in MLB, yet their team revenue isn't anywhere near the lowest. Their team revenue (ie not including revenue sharing or the national revenue divided among the 30 clubs) is significantly higher than that of (for example) the A's, D-Backs, and Tigers, yet the Indians' 2021 payroll is more than $30 million less than any of those three teams. Indians' fans should be disgusted. And MLB should not enable that with more revenue sharing.

Maybe a condition of receiving any revenue sharing money should be adherence to a minimum payroll that is at least 90 percent of the MLB median payroll. If an owner wants to pinch pennies, then he ought to have to do it without receiving even a dime of revenue sharing money.
07-13-2021 12:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 3,502
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 202
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: :uoᴉʇɐɔo⌉
Post: #7
RE: Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
(07-13-2021 12:19 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(07-13-2021 11:47 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  
(07-12-2021 04:36 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  MLB really needs to institute minimum and maximum payrolls. It'll probably never happen, but it would be good for the sport.

Yup - with greater revenue sharing.

The minimums would have to be really high in order to justify more revenue sharing; otherwise low-spending team owners will just keep pocketing the revenue sharing money rather than paying for a payroll at or near the MLB median.

Cleveland is a good example. The Indians have the lowest payroll in MLB, yet their team revenue isn't anywhere near the lowest. Their team revenue (ie not including revenue sharing or the national revenue divided among the 30 clubs) is significantly higher than that of (for example) the A's, D-Backs, and Tigers, yet the Indians' 2021 payroll is more than $30 million less than any of those three teams. Indians' fans should be disgusted. And MLB should not enable that with more revenue sharing.

Maybe a condition of receiving any revenue sharing money should be adherence to a minimum payroll that is at least 90 percent of the MLB median payroll. If an owner wants to pinch pennies, then he ought to have to do it without receiving even a dime of revenue sharing money.

I agree. However much revenue sharing money a team receives should be the very least that they'd be required to spend on payroll.
07-13-2021 01:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dbackjon Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,070
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 321
I Root For: NAU/Illini
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Cleveland Indians' financial woes... and there's no place to go
(07-13-2021 12:19 PM)Wedge Wrote:  
(07-13-2021 11:47 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  
(07-12-2021 04:36 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote:  MLB really needs to institute minimum and maximum payrolls. It'll probably never happen, but it would be good for the sport.

Yup - with greater revenue sharing.

The minimums would have to be really high in order to justify more revenue sharing; otherwise low-spending team owners will just keep pocketing the revenue sharing money rather than paying for a payroll at or near the MLB median.

Cleveland is a good example. The Indians have the lowest payroll in MLB, yet their team revenue isn't anywhere near the lowest. Their team revenue (ie not including revenue sharing or the national revenue divided among the 30 clubs) is significantly higher than that of (for example) the A's, D-Backs, and Tigers, yet the Indians' 2021 payroll is more than $30 million less than any of those three teams. Indians' fans should be disgusted. And MLB should not enable that with more revenue sharing.

Maybe a condition of receiving any revenue sharing money should be adherence to a minimum payroll that is at least 90 percent of the MLB median payroll. If an owner wants to pinch pennies, then he ought to have to do it without receiving even a dime of revenue sharing money.


Agreed -90% of median would work. Salary Cap would need to be low enough to force some of the big market teams to shed players
07-13-2021 07:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2021 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2021 MyBB Group.