johnbragg
Five Minute Google Expert
Posts: 16,358
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 996
I Root For: St Johns
Location:
|
I say something nice about the AAC: Very clearly ahead of other G5s.
Using the same link where I looked at whether the AAC plus BYU looked like a power conference ( https://collegefootballnews.com/2019/07/...m-analysis), I extended the question to see what the other FBS conferences looked like, beyond the top 50 schools for attendance.
I pointed out that the AAC wasn't very P6, because they had zero schools in the top 50. On the other hand, let's see how G5 they are.
Conference, 1-25, 26-50, 51-75, 76-100, 101+
SEC 9, 6, 1, 0, 0
B1G 7, 2, 5, 0, 0
PAC 3, 6, 3, 0, 0
XII 2, 7, 0, 1, 0
ACC 3, 5, 4, 2, 0
AAC 0, 0, 8, 2, 1
MWC 0, 0, 3, 6, 3
Sun Belt 0, 0, 0, 3, 7
CUSA 0, 0, 0, 8, 6
Some other ways to look at this data
Percentage of conference in the top 75
SEC, Big, PAC 100%
XII 90%
ACC 86%
AAC 72%
MWC 25%
CUSA, MAC, Belt 0%
Percentage of conference in the top 100
SEC, B1G, PAC, XII, ACC 100%
AAC 91%
MWC 75%
CUSA 57%
Belt 30%
MAC 17%
EDIT: Maybe next I'll throw the numbers into a quick spreadsheet and look at the 25%-75% for each conference. ALthough just from putting them into 25 school intervals, it looks like the MWC 75% is going to be around the AAC's 25%.
(This post was last modified: 06-15-2021 08:04 PM by johnbragg.)
|
|