(06-09-2021 02:17 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 09:23 AM)Danforth Wrote:  I get it if you don't like Stacey Abrams but is there really a need to attack her physical appearance?

Would you prefer we refer to her (more accurately) as a racist turd heap?

How is she racist.

Give examples. If you can do that then the label is warranted.

(06-10-2021 09:32 AM)Danforth Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 02:17 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 09:23 AM)Danforth Wrote:  I get it if you don't like Stacey Abrams but is there really a need to attack her physical appearance?

Would you prefer we refer to her (more accurately) as a racist turd heap?

How is she racist.

Give examples. If you can do that then the label is warranted.

Very first result on a simple bing.com search: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...893.html#!

I admire your willingness to carry the progressive flag, Danforth. Yet in doing so you are running interference for today's bigots, fascists and racists.

Perhaps that doesn't bother you. But it should.

(06-10-2021 09:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-10-2021 09:32 AM)Danforth Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 02:17 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 09:23 AM)Danforth Wrote:  I get it if you don't like Stacey Abrams but is there really a need to attack her physical appearance?

Would you prefer we refer to her (more accurately) as a racist turd heap?

How is she racist.

Give examples. If you can do that then the label is warranted.

Very first result on a simple bing.com search: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...893.html#!

I admire your willingness to carry the progressive flag, Danforth. Yet in doing so you are running interference for today's bigots, fascists and racists.

Perhaps that doesn't bother you. But it should.

Maybe your definition of being a racist is different from mine.

My definition of a racist is someone who thinks that their race is better than another.

Do you have evidence of that?

(06-09-2021 09:23 AM)Danforth Wrote:  I get it if you don't like Stacey Abrams but is there really a need to attack her physical appearance?

Yes…

(06-10-2021 11:26 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 09:23 AM)Danforth Wrote:  I get it if you don't like Stacey Abrams but is there really a need to attack her physical appearance?

Yes…

And what reason would that be?

(06-10-2021 11:05 AM)Danforth Wrote:  

(06-10-2021 09:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-10-2021 09:32 AM)Danforth Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 02:17 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 09:23 AM)Danforth Wrote:  I get it if you don't like Stacey Abrams but is there really a need to attack her physical appearance?

Would you prefer we refer to her (more accurately) as a racist turd heap?

How is she racist.

Give examples. If you can do that then the label is warranted.

Very first result on a simple bing.com search: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...893.html#!

I admire your willingness to carry the progressive flag, Danforth. Yet in doing so you are running interference for today's bigots, fascists and racists.

Perhaps that doesn't bother you. But it should.

Maybe your definition of being a racist is different from mine.

My definition of a racist is someone who thinks that their race is better than another.

Do you have evidence of that?

You're not much for paying attention. I guess that's the luxury of allowing partisan talking points stand in for actual thinking:

From her own mouth (back when she was lobbying for the v.p. role): "[W]omen of color, particularly black women, are the strongest part of the Democratic Party.”

(06-08-2021 03:15 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-08-2021 10:25 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(06-05-2021 03:00 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-05-2021 01:10 PM)bullet Wrote:  Trump didn't help in the senate races and he's done his best to make Stacey the Hut the next governor of Georgia. Kemp was relatively safe for reelection until Trump started criticizing him.

A drooling pedophile as president. A senate that is unnecessarily in Democrat control. A gap-toothed water buffalo as the next governor of Georgia.

Is all of this the “magnificent” part or the “bastard” part?

Fair points. And now let's put on our dark caps:

Is Kemp really worth saving? What has he done other than be marginally less odious? F*ck Stacey the Hut, absolutely. And f*ck Kemp too. They're BOTH useless.

If given the choice between a mug of warm, flat beer (Kemp) or a cup of sour milk (Abrams), most rational people with the option to do so will reject both and go to the fridge for a fresh beer.

And that's exactly how Donald Trump has responded - - because he has that luxury.

But most of the rest of us are not Donald Trump. We do not have the option to pull a fresh beer from the fridge. By inserting himself, yet again, in a process in which he has no real skin in the game, he is essentially forcing the citizens of Georgia to drink the cup of sour milk.

I don't happen to think that is admirable behavior.

What makes you think the good people of Georgia will vote for The Hut just because of DJT? The same woman who will be eventually shown to be complicit in the election fraud?
Trump has destroyed Kemp. Kemp deserved it. The same guy he helped get elected. The same man who has done chit to make sure his state elections are run properly. The same guy who attacked Trump in return. No they will vote for a fresh player who is not a never Trumper. There is a vacuum to be filled. The question is who will fill it?

(06-09-2021 09:23 AM)Danforth Wrote:  I get it if you don't like Stacey Abrams but is there really a need to attack her physical appearance?

Is there a reason not to?

(06-09-2021 02:15 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 01:50 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-08-2021 03:15 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-08-2021 10:25 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(06-05-2021 03:00 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  A drooling pedophile as president. A senate that is unnecessarily in Democrat control. A gap-toothed water buffalo as the next governor of Georgia.

Is all of this the “magnificent” part or the “bastard” part?

Fair points. And now let's put on our dark caps:

Is Kemp really worth saving? What has he done other than be marginally less odious? F*ck Stacey the Hut, absolutely. And f*ck Kemp too. They're BOTH useless.

If given the choice between a mug of warm, flat beer (Kemp) or a cup of sour milk (Abrams), most rational people with the option to do so will reject both and go to the fridge for a fresh beer.

And that's exactly how Donald Trump has responded - - because he has that luxury.

But most of the rest of us are not Donald Trump. We do not have the option to pull a fresh beer from the fridge. By inserting himself, yet again, in a process in which he has no real skin in the game, he is essentially forcing the citizens of Georgia to drink the cup of sour milk.

I don't happen to think that is admirable behavior.

Stop accepting mediocracy. If we kept doing that, we would have had Hillary for president against a failed Jeb!

Brad Kemp was the man in charge of state that allowed voting fraud to the degree that caused Trump to lose, and two republican senators to lose. That wasnt Trump. That was on Kemp. Funny how in the house races across the nation, republicans racked up. But in GA, they allowed fraud to seep in and lose.

Dont blame the guy that told you it was going to happen and wants someone else. Blame the guy that was told it was going to happen, and let it happen anyway.

You and I are just not going to see eye-to-eye on this point - - and I will freely concede that most on this forum agree with you and consider me to be an unwelcome annoyance.

But let's try to stay focused on the point of the thread: Whether Donald Trump lost due to biblical-level voter fraud or due to his own noisy incompetence is not the question. The question is Kemp (Mr. Warm, Flat Beer) or Abrams (the vat of sour milk).

Donald Trump doesn't much care whether it is Kemp or Abrams who wins the Ga. governorship. And perhaps it really doesn't matter - - principles of conservative purity outweigh concerts for racist progressivism. I just happen to think that it does matter. And if I were a Georgia resident, I would care a whole lot more.

I too would hope the people of Georgia care a lot more and enough so as to reject the two schitty options you have outlined, flat beer or sour milk.

That’s the best that entire state can come up with? Not buying it. Go find a nice, cold refreshing peach pils and go all in on that. Someone around there should see the opportunity and seize upon it.

(06-08-2021 03:49 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Is Kemp worth saving? No.
Is Abrams worth beating? Absolutely.

Georgia, welcome to the situation I find myself in most of the time, where the republican isn't worth voting for, but the democrat absolutely needs to be beaten.

Do you mean like with a hammer?

LOL, don't blame me, I heard that from Killery herself, bless her heart.

(06-09-2021 02:17 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 09:23 AM)Danforth Wrote:  I get it if you don't like Stacey Abrams but is there really a need to attack her physical appearance?

Would you prefer we refer to her (more accurately) as a racist turd heap?

Aw...c'mon, guys...can't we just do both?

(06-10-2021 12:37 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-10-2021 11:05 AM)Danforth Wrote:  

(06-10-2021 09:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-10-2021 09:32 AM)Danforth Wrote:  

(06-09-2021 02:17 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Would you prefer we refer to her (more accurately) as a racist turd heap?

How is she racist.

Give examples. If you can do that then the label is warranted.

Very first result on a simple bing.com search: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...893.html#!

I admire your willingness to carry the progressive flag, Danforth. Yet in doing so you are running interference for today's bigots, fascists and racists.

Perhaps that doesn't bother you. But it should.

Maybe your definition of being a racist is different from mine.

My definition of a racist is someone who thinks that their race is better than another.

Do you have evidence of that?

You're not much for paying attention. I guess that's the luxury of allowing partisan talking points stand in for actual thinking:

From her own mouth (back when she was lobbying for the v.p. role): "[W]omen of color, particularly black women, are the strongest part of the Democratic Party.”

Okay yeah that's definitely a racist statement.