CrimsonPhantom
CUSA Curator

Posts: 62,726
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3188
I Root For: NM State
Location:
|
Waters Accused of Abusing the Use of Air Marshals
Quote:Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) has been a big backer of the anti-police, BLM movement.
Indeed, she visited Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, last month to tell protesters that they should get more “confrontational”, if they didn’t get what they wanted when it came to the verdict in the trial of Derek Chauvin. She also bashed the police while there, and later, in an interview with CNN’s Jim Acosta.
But this is a huge crock from her because while she bashes police, she seems to be very eager to have police protecting her.
As we previously reported, even as she traveled to Brooklyn Center, she allegedly had police protection on her way there.
Now, there may be a scandal breaking over her use of air marshals. And she’s not the only member of Congress involved.
Air marshals were put on flights in the wake of the 9/11 attack to protect flights, particularly high risk flights, from danger. But, according to the New York Post, after the riot at the Capitol, lawmakers began asking for extra protection when going back and forth on flights, even when going on vacation. So in response, the TSA began pulling the marshals from the high risk flights to protect the members of Congress instead.
While we reported Maxine Waters allegedly had police protection from the Capitol Police when she went to Brooklyn Center to agitate against the police, she actually may have had even more protection that we thought.
According to a complaint filed with the House Ethics Committee, she was accompanied by “two armed Capitol Police and two U.S. Secret Service agents.” On top of those people, Waters requested two air marshals to join her on the plane, plus two more to escort her through the airport when she got to Minneapolis. So, she was allegedly protected by at least eight people on her way to Brooklyn Center.
From Fox News:
“Air marshals can only be assigned to high-risk flights. That means flights that have been deemed through our vetted process that have a security risk,” said Sonya Hightower LoBasco, executive director of the Air Marshal National Council. “When these processes are violated and they’re taken advantage of and they are just tossed to the side now as if they don’t matter, we’re really looking into creating a major problem for ourselves in the aviation domain.” [….]
“Congresswoman Maxine Waters utilized numerous government resources inappropriately,” the complaint reads. “Federal Air Marshals were removed from a “High Risk” flight to cover Ms. Waters flight to Minnesota. The High Risk flight took off with no armed law enforcement on board leaving a gap in National Security.”
“Air marshals for Miss Waters trip were assigned high risk missions, they were removed from those missions and assigned to Miss Waters mission on top of her already armed security detail from the Capitol Police,” Hightower said. “That was not an official business trip. We still don’t have any justification as to why government resources were utilized to fly Miss Waters out to Minnesota.”
The Capitol Police and the U.S. Secret Service are denying that they provided Waters protection, but their denial conflicts with what the Air Marshal group is saying. Obviously Waters did get protection from air marshals, which raises the greater question of her denying those marshals from being able to protect high risk flights because of her request.
The president of the Air Marshal National Council, David Londo, objected to the greater point of using the marshals this way, calling it an “egregious misuse of government resources,” David Londo, president of the Air Marshal National Council, said in a complaint to the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General.
“The FAMs are now taking agents off of regularly scheduled “high risk” flights to put them on flights with members of Congress, that in most cases have their own armed federal security details onboard already. It has become akin to a type of extremely expensive concierge service for Congressional members.”
Members of Congress are supposed to be serving us, but with this, they’re taking away protection that’s actually needed elsewhere for Americans. The marshals aren’t supposed to be servants or security for Congress. This has the potential of putting national security at risk.
Link
|
|
| 05-15-2021 11:20 AM |
|
CrimsonPhantom
CUSA Curator

Posts: 62,726
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 3188
I Root For: NM State
Location:
|
RE: Waters Accused of Abusing the Use of Air Marshals
Quote:“I know this, we’ve got to stay in the streets,” Waters said to the activists who were there. “We are looking for a guilty verdict.” “I am very hopeful and I hope that we are going to get a verdict that is guilty, guilty, guilty,” she continued. “And if we don’t, we cannot go away.”
After that little song and dance by Rep. Mad Hatter, a Minneapolis National Guard member was shot. But just as with other times, Mad Maxine felt no shame, remorse, and offered no apologies for her behavior. Despite placing her crooked thumb on the scales with her rant (even the Chauvin trial judge said this), Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat colleagues didn’t even feel the need to censure her.
She got it like that, and she expects that anyone who questions her choices should be ignored, or deserves to be silenced. So, after Fox News exposed that not only is Mad Maxine being brought up on ethics charges for using Capitol Police and Secret Service for protection during her Minneapolis visit, but that she also used federal Air Marshalls for protection, the Mad Hatter is now turning her inner Alinsky on Fox, threatening a lawsuit:
Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Los Angeles, has threatened legal action against Fox News for a story that claimed Waters and other members of Congress were abusing a program created after 9/11 to protect the flying public by assigning air marshals to certain domestic flights.
According to the Fox News story, a complaint filed with the House Committee on Ethics alleges that Waters flew from Washington, D.C., to Minneapolis on April 17 to attend the trial of former police officer Derek Chauvin, who was convicted of murdering George Floyd. The complaint says Waters was accompanied by two armed Capitol Police and two U.S. Secret Service agents, but allegedly requested two federal air marshals and two more marshals once the plane touched down to escort her in the airport.
U.S. Capitol Police and Secret Service officials denied those claims, telling Fox News that neither agency provided in-flight protection for Waters.
Mad Maxine took to her soapbox with sound and fury to deny the report, and to complain that having her travel records leaked has put her life at risk.
You cannot make this stuff up.
Waters added that following her trip to Minnesota, “I became aware that documents outlining a security threat assessment that included my flight number and other travel information was leaked to TownHall, a right-wing media outlet. It was then subsequently shared by Fox News, the New York Post, the Post Millennial, and other outlets where it was falsely claimed that the document indicated I had requested police protection during my trip. Again, this is an absolute lie. … This leak of my travel information and operational and threat assessment information is deeply disturbing and puts my life at risk.”
Fox News is standing by its report. Since Mad Maxine used her official capacity as a United States Representative to travel to Minneapolis, and used publicly-paid for security, then it’s all a matter of public record. Mad Maxine has no leg to stand on, and she knows it.
But the sound, the fury, and the gaslighting continue apace.
Mad Maxine knows she be workin’ those Alinsky rules: “Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.”
Link
|
|
| 05-18-2021 08:50 PM |
|