The link below is a list of the top 2000 Universities in the world. 19,788 universities were ranked. The AAC rankings show the USA ranking, followed by the World ranking. Let me know what you think.

https://cwur.org/2021-22.php

AAC

80-236 Cincinnati
87-257 Houston
96-297 USF
105-314 SMU
109-352 Temple
123-441 Tulane
131-463 UCF
203-898 ECU
215-965 Memphis
222-1020 Navy
288-1494 Tulsa
337-1889 Wichita State

Some notable schools for consideration to join the AAC, and schools that interest me personally. USA rankings.

262-Boise State
158-BYU
145-Georgia State
86-Colorado State
70-Uconn
168-Nevada
192-UNLV


287-TCU
242-Marquette
227-Villanova
132-Louisville
129-Alabama
185-Northern Illinois
17-Illinois
14-Northwestern
6-University of Chicago
1-Harvard

Seems like a better ranking system than USNews. Just my perspective.

(04-28-2021 12:38 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  Seems like a better ranking system than USNews. Just my perspective.

Some of these rankings surprised me, but I'll wait to hear everyone else's thoughts before I comment.

How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

(04-28-2021 01:43 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

When I saw it, I figured research was a heavy component.
International outlook doesnt do is any favors either

(04-28-2021 02:04 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:43 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

When I saw it, I figured research was a heavy component.
International outlook doesnt do is any favors either

that and its a ridiculous list.

ole miss 434
pepperdine 928

absolute garbage list from:

Center for World University Rankings
Business Park, RAK Economic Zone
P.O. Box 36726, United Arab Emirates

they are jerking happily over being 985 or whatever on the memphis board

(04-28-2021 02:04 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:43 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

When I saw it, I figured research was a heavy component.
International outlook doesnt do us any favors either

We're ahead of Army and Air Force ain't even on the list. I'll sleep well tonight.

(04-28-2021 02:34 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 02:04 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:43 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

When I saw it, I figured research was a heavy component.
International outlook doesnt do us any favors either

We're ahead of Army and Air Force ain't even on the list. I'll sleep well tonight.

priorities

(04-28-2021 02:30 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 02:04 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:43 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

When I saw it, I figured research was a heavy component.
International outlook doesnt do is any favors either

that and its a ridiculous list.

ole miss 434
pepperdine 928

absolute garbage list.

It is a "world" list so international schools are ranked. Ole Miss is #160 in the USNWR rankings so being listed #434 when you factor in the universities abroad it compares.

(04-28-2021 02:34 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 02:04 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:43 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

When I saw it, I figured research was a heavy component.
International outlook doesnt do us any favors either

We're ahead of Army and Air Force ain't even on the list. I'll sleep well tonight.

cincinnati ahead of Houston!!!!, iam appalled, what has the world come to.

(04-28-2021 02:34 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 02:04 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:43 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

When I saw it, I figured research was a heavy component.
International outlook doesnt do us any favors either

We're ahead of Army and Air Force ain't even on the list. I'll sleep well tonight.

cincinnati ahead of Houston!!!!, iam appalled, what has the world come to.

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

I couldn't believe it either.

(04-28-2021 02:30 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 02:04 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:43 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(04-28-2021 01:22 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  How on gods green earth is Navy ranked that low...

Guess it not 100% based on the level of education you get.

Curious what they use to measure a universities quality.

The metrics for the World University rankings are:

Teaching
Volume of research
Citations (research influence)
International Outlook (staff, students, research)
Industry Income

For this reason you'll see the liberal arts schools fall back behind the heavy research institutions. The metrics of the USNWR and the AAU puts a strong emphasis on liberal arts.

When I saw it, I figured research was a heavy component.
International outlook doesnt do is any favors either

that and its a ridiculous list.

ole miss 434
pepperdine 928

absolute garbage list from:

Center for World University Rankings
Business Park, RAK Economic Zone
P.O. Box 36726, United Arab Emirates

they are jerking happily over being 985 or whatever on the memphis board

965 out of 19,788. That puts us in the top 5 percentile. Nothing wrong with that.

UMass ahead of Notre Dame and Georgetown is too funny.

Yeah... putting an emphasis on research typically means that you’re ranking graduate programs more than undergraduate programs. Grad students are far more likely to participate in research or be cited. Also, I’d like to know about the amount of research or the number of citations on a % basis to student size. Tulsa is tiny. Of course we’re not going to produce as many papers as Ohio State. But we might have individuals who are cited more often on a % basis.

The way this metric is done for this ranking seems flawed to me. Probably done by a former UH grad student. I hear they’re finally teaching them to count using their fingers AND their toes. This makes their “research” twice as legitimate.

This is a strange ranking.

USF should be above UH
UC amd UCF probably as well

There are different ways of measuring research. One is by the money spent.
USF does significantly more research than UH.

Another, are the results. The https://academyofinventors.org/ ranks
universities on patents granted. Again, USF is higher.
It shows:

16 USF
65 UCF
76 UH
96 UC
Georgia State is not in the top 100 of universities granted patents.

As far as teaching is a metric, shouln't it matter if a school is
ranked #1 in the country on entrepreneurship and ranks in the top 100
of universities in the World in producing millioniares?

Universities cannot afford to sleep with their rankings. Some have
dreams. Some have dreams, drive, and money. There are reasons I call
it "Incubator U". UH has an AAU program called "50-in-5". Each
department is expected to increase output by %50 within 5 years.
The "Iron Lady" will crack the whip. Just, ask Levine and Applewhite.

(04-28-2021 12:36 PM)Memphis Yankee Wrote:  The link below is a list of the top 2000 Universities in the world. 19,788 universities were ranked. The AAC rankings show the USA ranking, followed by the World ranking. Let me know what you think.

https://cwur.org/2021-22.php

AAC

80-236 Cincinnati
87-257 Houston
96-297 USF
105-314 SMU
109-352 Temple
123-441 Tulane
131-463 UCF
203-898 ECU
215-965 Memphis
222-1020 Navy
288-1494 Tulsa
337-1889 Wichita State

Some notable schools for consideration to join the AAC, and schools that interest me personally. USA rankings.

262-Boise State
158-BYU
145-Georgia State
86-Colorado State
70-Uconn
168-Nevada
192-UNLV


287-TCU
242-Marquette
227-Villanova
132-Louisville
129-Alabama
185-Northern Illinois
17-Illinois
14-Northwestern
6-University of Chicago
1-Harvard

.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

(04-28-2021 05:06 PM)HoustonRocks Wrote:  This is a strange ranking.

USF should be above UH
UC amd UCF probably as well

There are different ways of measuring research. One is by the money spent.
USF does significantly more research than UH.

Another, are the results. The https://academyofinventors.org/ ranks
universities on patents granted. Again, USF is higher.
It shows:

16 USF
65 UCF
76 UH
96 UC
Georgia State is not in the top 100 of universities granted patents.

As far as teaching is a metric, shouln't it matter if a school is
ranked #1 in the country on entrepreneurship and ranks in the top 100
of universities in the World in producing millioniares?

Universities cannot afford to sleep with their rankings. Some have
dreams. Some have dreams, drive, and money. There are reasons I call
it "Incubator U". UH has an AAU program called "50-in-5". Each
department is expected to increase output by %50 within 5 years.
The "Iron Lady" will crack the whip. Just, ask Levine and Applewhite.

He Mad

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

I am always suspicious when I see small sized universities similarly grouped lower than most of their rankings in more well known places.

Usually a good sign they are working off of raw numbers. That means certain institutions have built in advantages of overall numbers.