georgia_tech_swagger
Res publica non dominetur
Posts: 51,423
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 2019
I Root For: GT, USCU, FU, WYO
Location: Upstate, SC
|
UVA: Woker than thou
Legend has it the Thomas Jefferson statues on campus are spinning at sufficient speed to provide gyroscopic stabilization.
Quote:Kieran Bhattacharya is a student at the University of Virginia (UVA) School of Medicine. On October 25, 2018, he attended a panel discussion on the subject of microaggressions. Dissatisfied with the definition of a microaggression offered by the presenter—Beverly Cowell Adams, an assistant dean—Bhattacharya raised his hand.
Within a few weeks, as a result of the fallout from Bhattacharya's question about microagressions, the administration had branded him a threat to the university and banned him from campus. He is now suing UVA for violating his First Amendment rights, and a judge recently ruled that his suit should proceed
....
But Nora Kern*, an assistant professor who helped to organize the event, thought Bhattacharya's questions were a bit too pointed. Immediately following the panel, she filed a "professionalism concern card"—a kind of record of a student's violations of university policy.
"This student asked a series of questions that were quite antagonistic toward the panel," wrote Kern. "He pressed on and stated one faculty member was being contradictory. His level of frustration/anger seemed to escalate until another faculty member defused the situation by calling on another student for questions. I am shocked that a med student would show so little respect toward faculty members. It worries me how he will do on wards."
According to Bhattacharya's lawsuit, the concern card generated interest from an assistant dean in the medical school, who emailed him and offered to meet. The assistant dean assured him that "I simply want to help you understand and be able to cope with unintended consequences of conversations."
....
Then a dean of student affairs asked to meet as well.
Meanwhile, the Academic Standards and Achievement Committee met to to discuss the concern card. This committee voted to send Bhattacharya a written reminder to "show mutual respect" to faculty members and "express yourself appropriately." The committee also suggested that he get counseling.
On November 26, this suggestion became a mandate: The student was informed that he must be evaluated by psychological services before returning to classes. Bhattacharya repeatedly asked university officials to clarify what exactly he was accused of, under whose authority his counseling had been mandated, and why his enrollment status was suddenly in doubt, according to the lawsuit. These queries only appear to have made UVA officials more determined to punish him: Bhattacharya's mounting frustration with these baseless accusations of unspecified wrongdoings was essentially treated as evidence that he was guilty. At his hearing, he was accused of being "extremely defensive" and ordered to change his "aggressive, threatening behavior."
He was ultimately suspended for "aggressive and inappropriate interactions in multiple situations." On December 30, UVA police ordered him to leave campus.
...
His lawsuit contends that UVA violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for speaking his mind. UVA filed a motion to dismiss the case, but a district court judge ruled that the suit could proceed.
"Bhattacharya sufficiently alleges that Defendants retaliated against him," wrote the court. "Indeed, they issued a Professionalism Concern Card against him, suspended him from UVA Medical School, required him to undergo counseling and obtain 'medical clearance' as a prerequisite for remaining enrolled, and prevented him from appealing his suspension or applying for readmission."
It is vital that UVA lose this case, and lose badly. Students must have the right to question administrators about poorly formed concepts from social psychology without fearing that they will be branded as threats to public order. That's the difference between a public university and an asylum.
https://reason.com/2021/04/07/microaggre...ya-threat/
|
|
04-10-2021 11:24 AM |
|
Bear Catlett
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,921
Joined: Jan 2020
Reputation: 1523
I Root For: UC
Location:
|
RE: UVA: Woker than thou
Seems I recall some old saying about a kitchen and it being hot that I would refer UVA to...
|
|
04-10-2021 11:44 AM |
|
JMUDunk
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud
Posts: 29,606
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 1731
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
|
UVA: Woker than thou
First line last paragraph: “It is vital UVA lose this case and lose badly”.
Absofreakinglutely. When you can no longer offer dissenting opinions on a college or university campus we are doomed as a free society. We will stagnate as a society, and the divide between those who work hard and just want to live their lives V. the overcredenutialed “intelligentsia” that believe themselves “superior” and our ruling class will only grow wider.
Those who thought they knew it al used to present their views in the effort to persuade, now the want to simply stifle, brow beat, dismiss and muzzle. Even worse if necessary.
We’ve seen this movie before, it never ends well. At all
|
|
04-10-2021 03:05 PM |
|