Statefan
Banned
Posts: 3,511
Joined: May 2018
I Root For: .
Location:
|
RE: What if Wednesday: What if there was no SEC? Or ACC?
(03-31-2021 01:28 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: As we all know, most of the SEC and ACC were once in the SoCon until the SEC schools broke away in the early 30s. But what if no break away occurs?
The SEC continues as a 23 member athletic consortium.
In 1936, a group of non-members, Wake Forest, Davidson, Furman, Richmond, William & Mary, and the Citadel, form the Magnolia Conference. Through the 30s and 40s, some of the weaker SoCon schools jump to this private school league—VMI, Washington & Lee, and Sewanee. This ushers in an era of a 20 member league:
Maryland, UVA, VT, UNC, NC ST, Duke, Clemson, SC, GT, UGA, Florida, Auburn, Alabama, Tennessee, Vanderbilt, UK, Ole Miss, Miss St, LSU, and Tulane.
Being such a large conference, crowning a single champ would be difficult and thus the Sugar Bowl becomes the site where the Champion of the South is crowned in a match up between the two schools with the best conference record.
I venture to say the issues that caused GT to leave the SEC and SC to leave the ACC are negated—GT just refuses to schedule Alabama for a time and the SAT score legislation that left SC scorned never happens. I’m iffy if Tulane chooses to stay or if they go.
As far as scheduling goes, the SEC didn’t appear to set a standard number of games until the mid-70s and I imagine the same holds true here. Schools in the center of the footprint would tend to play more games while those on the edges—LSU, Tulane, Florida, Maryland, etc choose to play less in favor of OOC games.
I’m not sure how the 1989-1990 realignment and the Bowl Coalition/Alliance play out. I can see schools like Florida St, Miami, and Arkansas being desperate to join this group and schools like Texas and Texas A&M would certainly have an interest.
Maybe they expand; maybe they don’t.
I also have to wonder how the rest of college football would be impacted by a 20 member SEC. Is their pressure on the Big 10 to follow a similar mold and expand with Eastern Independents and/or the Big 8? Maybe the SWC and Big 8 are inclined to commit to a full or partial merger sooner?.
I think this is a fun one to consider. Feel free to offer your own thoughts on how all of this might have played out and what alignment would look like today had the SoCon remained intact.
I'm not certain you can keep the Southern Conference together after WWII with the core ACC and SEC members but it would not have held together past the early 1960's because Duke was not going to recruit black kids to play football.
They and a few others would have left in the 60's over the 800 SAT rule. I think Duke, Maryland, Vandy, Tulane (if they are still in) UVa, and perhaps Florida and North Carolina might have pulled out at that time. Basketball mechanics would have been different with the Tournament staying in Atlanta instead of moving to Duke Indoor in Durham and Reynolds Coliseum in Raleigh.
If they do this in the mid 1960's, I suspect that you get Tulane, Vandy, Miami, Florida, UNC, Duke, UVa, and MD.
The SoCon being left with LSU, MSU. Ole Miss, Bama, Auburn, Tenn, UK, GT, UGa, Clemson, SC, NC State, and VT. FSU is their first add when expansion starts in the 80's.
It's hard to paper over the cultural differences at the time between the Deep South, Appalachian South, and the Tidewater South. There is no "solid South" even with regard to race and football as athletic ability eventually trumps all. If a half Martian, half transvestite could run for 3-5 touchdowns a game, Bama would choke back their societal qualms and find a way to put that kid on the football field because football is society to them.
(This post was last modified: 03-31-2021 05:40 PM by Statefan.)
|
|