Cincinnati Bearcats

Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UC Statement on Brannen
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
bearcatmark Online
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,837
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 806
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #1001
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
Filed nearly identical suit in common pleas.
 
10-04-2021 09:57 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,358
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2169
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #1002
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
Are you kidding? Lol

Finally figured out he had venue wrong and he might have known he was going to lose on UC’s pending motion to dismiss. Don’t think I saw a decision on that yet but I wasn’t keeping an eye out.
 
10-04-2021 10:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCGrad1992 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 31,911
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 2297
I Root For: Bearcats U
Location: North Carolina
Post: #1003
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
Guys, can you help us non-lawyer types out here? Are you saying his original suit had an error that risked being thrown out of court? The second suit gives him a fall-back?
 
10-04-2021 10:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmark Online
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,837
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 806
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #1004
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(10-04-2021 10:12 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  Guys, can you help us non-lawyer types out here? Are you saying his original suit had an error that risked being thrown out of court? The second suit gives him a fall-back?

He's leaving federal court for the state court system. He had to dismiss his federal suit to do so. Federal Court requires specific jurisdiction requirements that were always dubious. He's now filing in the court that clearly would have jurisdiction (even if his claims are weak).

The federal filing was a waste of time and money. We'll see what happens with the local filing
 
10-05-2021 05:35 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 21,920
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1181
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
Post: #1005
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
As I posted earlier in the thread the proper venue is the Ohio Court of Claims. This is the venue where you sue state entities for money, such as the O’Brien v Ohio State University case

https://ohiocourtofclaims.gov/
 
10-05-2021 06:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,358
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2169
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #1006
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(10-05-2021 05:35 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  
(10-04-2021 10:12 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  Guys, can you help us non-lawyer types out here? Are you saying his original suit had an error that risked being thrown out of court? The second suit gives him a fall-back?

He's leaving federal court for the state court system. He had to dismiss his federal suit to do so. Federal Court requires specific jurisdiction requirements that were always dubious. He's now filing in the court that clearly would have jurisdiction (even if his claims are weak).

The federal filing was a waste of time and money. We'll see what happens with the local filing

1st month 1Ls could have told him federal court was the wrong answer.

There needs to be a yakkity sax track in the background.
 
10-05-2021 07:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bearcatmark Online
Moderator
*

Posts: 30,837
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation: 806
I Root For: the Deliverator
Location:
Post: #1007
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(10-05-2021 07:56 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  
(10-05-2021 05:35 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  
(10-04-2021 10:12 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  Guys, can you help us non-lawyer types out here? Are you saying his original suit had an error that risked being thrown out of court? The second suit gives him a fall-back?

He's leaving federal court for the state court system. He had to dismiss his federal suit to do so. Federal Court requires specific jurisdiction requirements that were always dubious. He's now filing in the court that clearly would have jurisdiction (even if his claims are weak).

The federal filing was a waste of time and money. We'll see what happens with the local filing

1st month 1Ls could have told him federal court was the wrong answer.

There needs to be a yakkity sax track in the background.

It was always so weird that he went the federal route. I had thought maybe it was a recoverable damages decision, but honestly could it just be a litigious dickhead trying to be a pain in the ass? He's apparently trimmed down the complaint significantly for the Ohio Court of Claims. Makes me think the initial federal suit was a PR stunt to get the media to talk about the claims that were in it.
 
(This post was last modified: 10-05-2021 08:06 AM by bearcatmark.)
10-05-2021 08:06 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,358
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2169
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #1008
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
He knows what I said in April. Hamilton County Common Pleas is likely a losing road game for him.

UC gets this case into Common Pleas, any litigator worth his or her salt hits voir dire and gets the jury heavy in minorities and women...after testimony of the players and support staff they’d wear his guts for garters.
 
10-05-2021 08:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 21,920
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1181
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
Post: #1009
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(10-05-2021 08:06 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  
(10-05-2021 07:56 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  
(10-05-2021 05:35 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  
(10-04-2021 10:12 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  Guys, can you help us non-lawyer types out here? Are you saying his original suit had an error that risked being thrown out of court? The second suit gives him a fall-back?

He's leaving federal court for the state court system. He had to dismiss his federal suit to do so. Federal Court requires specific jurisdiction requirements that were always dubious. He's now filing in the court that clearly would have jurisdiction (even if his claims are weak).

The federal filing was a waste of time and money. We'll see what happens with the local filing

1st month 1Ls could have told him federal court was the wrong answer.

There needs to be a yakkity sax track in the background.

It was always so weird that he went the federal route. I had thought maybe it was a recoverable damages decision, but honestly could it just be a litigious dickhead trying to be a pain in the ass? He's apparently trimmed down the complaint significantly for the Ohio Court of Claims. Makes me think the initial federal suit was a PR stunt to get the media to talk about the claims that were in it.

In my world of Medical Professional Liability, we see cases filed in Federal or Common Pleas Court initially instead of the Court of Claims quite often. There are advantages and disadvantages to being in the Court of Claims. State actors have some immunity defenses that are available in the Court of Claims. You waive your right to a jury trial in the Court of Claims and the matter is heard by a judge. Any award of damages in the Court of Claims will be reduced by other collateral recovery received by the plaintiff. In the Court of Claims you cannot receive punitive damages or attorneys fees. Any settlement made in a case venued in the Court of Claims has to have approval of both the Court and the Ohio Attorney General.
 
10-05-2021 08:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Cataclysmo Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,076
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 214
I Root For: Cincinnat
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #1010
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
(10-05-2021 08:06 AM)bearcatmark Wrote:  It was always so weird that he went the federal route. I had thought maybe it was a recoverable damages decision, but honestly could it just be a litigious dickhead trying to be a pain in the ass? He's apparently trimmed down the complaint significantly for the Ohio Court of Claims. Makes me think the initial federal suit was a PR stunt to get the media to talk about the claims that were in it.

Is it normal for a high profile client/lawyer to be so openly dickish on the internet? I'm sure in the criminal defense world you'd have an aneurysm watching half the crap Mars has pulled.
 
10-05-2021 09:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,358
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2169
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #1011
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
No. He’s a special breed.

His bedside manner gives late night TV slip and fall ambulance chasers a bad name, IMO.
 
10-05-2021 10:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
geef Offline
JV Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 4,165
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 297
I Root For: Binturongs
Location: Cascadia
Post: #1012
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
I'd drop some cash to put Rath in a room with Brannen for 5 minutes and have him go off. Maybe we can take up a collection and pay him off that way.
 
10-05-2021 11:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rath v2.0 Offline
Wartime Consigliere
*

Posts: 51,358
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2169
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt

Donators
Post: #1013
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
I’d give my time pro bono just to do that knucklehead’s deposition. It would be a 2 day root canal.
 
10-05-2021 04:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CliftonAve Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 21,920
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1181
I Root For: Jimmy Nippert
Location:
Post: #1014
RE: UC Statement on Brannen
A awsuit has been filed in the Ohio Court of Claims, which I stated previously was the proper venue.


https://www.sportingnews.com/us/ncaa-bas...gnj8qn4w8r
 
10-28-2021 01:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.