(03-11-2021 06:45 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  This is a logical next step once the barrier of marriage between male/female was broken down and tossed out.

If a relationship no longer has to be man/women
and can be man/man or woman/woman...
why does a relationship have to be 2?
why not 3 or more as long as they are consenting and adults?

One could argue polyamorous or polygamous relationships are more natural than homosexual ones. At least offspring can be produced by poly combinations assuming there are male and female combinations.

It was the logical first step. I don't even care about this, at least there are historical cultural examples and the underlying purpose of polygamy is large families. Far sicker paradigms are already allowed.

I have less issue with this than I do the tranny / genderless agenda.

I don't really care what consenting adults do.

(03-12-2021 02:55 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I don't really care what consenting adults do.

"If you don't actively support it, YOU"RE part of the problem!!!"

"But that will never happen".

Make Polygamy Great Again!

Poor Utah, they're gonna lose their tax base. I wonder how many tried and true Mormons wil move to Cambridge?

Unless two women are working and supporting me then it's a moot point. LOL It's not worth the hassles. One is enough and sometimes too much. It started with Eve when she told Adam, "if you loved me, you'd..."