As noted above, Commissioner Aresco has made it clear that CFP expansion could hasten the move to replace Connecticut and/or to expand AAC membership to 14.
Here are some excerpts from an article that confirms that the CFP may be likely to expand in the future (possibly in 2021-22), but suggests the possibility of an expansion to a 6, rather than 8-team playoff system, which would only make it slightly more feasible for a non-P5 team to qualify:
Quote:Expanding the College Football Playoff to eight will not solve its issues, but these alterations may
(excerpts)
By Dennis Dodd CBSSports.com
Jan 13, 2021 at 11:25 am ET
Seven years into the 12-year CFP agreement with ESPN, there seems to be almost universal agreement the four-team playoff will be expanded in the future. FBS coaches voted Tuesday showing "overwhelming support" for an expanded playoff during the annual American Football Coaches Association convention.
...so expansion is on the table. But when, how and how many teams?
Sure, the Group of Five would have a likelier path, but let's look at an eight-team playoff based on the final CFP Rankings of the 2020 season.
(1) Alabama vs. (8) Cincinnati
(4) Notre Dame vs. (5) Texas A&M
(2) Clemson vs. (7) Florida
(3) Ohio State vs. (6) Oklahoma
Notice anything? The Power Five picks up three more playoff spots, and the SEC gets three teams in. With the ACC getting two (Notre Dame was aligned in 2020), that only leaves three spots for everyone else...
................................................................................................................
NOTE: ANOTHER PROBLEM WITH HAVING THESE TOP 8-RANKED TEAMS PLAY - - NOT NOTED BY THE AUTHOR - - IS THAT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY POSSIBLE FOR TWO SEC TEAMS (E.G., ALABAMA & FLORIDA) OR TWO ACC TEAMS (CLEMSON & NOTRE DAME) TO MEET IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP ROUND
THE NFL PREVENTS THIS FROM HAPPENING BY HAVING THE AFC & NFC CHAMPIONS PLAY IN THE NFL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME (SUPER BOWL).
................................................................................................................
"In the last month, it had become pretty clear [the playoff] is a [Power Five] invitational," AAC commissioner Mike Aresco said...That became clear again this year. Only 12 teams have played in the CFP in its seven-year history...
.
So what might work?
1. A six-team playoff: Expand by two teams (not four), adding two play-in games with the top teams receiving byes. That begins to address Group of Five concerns...
2. Move the CFP National Championship off Monday night:
3. Reduce the playoff-or-bust mentality:
4. Create more transparency:
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footba...tions-may/
Dodd's confirmation of a likely expansion of the CFP system is somewhat encouraging from an AAC standpoint, but it wouldn't be nearly as beneficial as either a simple expansion to 8 teams or an expansion to 8 with an automatic bid going to the top G5 conference championship team.
Unfortunately, Dodd's proposed remedies, which wouldn't include automatic bids for conference champions, wouldn't be likely to result in anything more than a cosmetic improvement, since all of the teams in the CFP would continue to be selected by committee.
Another problem with a 6-team CFP is that the top two teams would get a round 1 bye, which would give them an unfair advantage, since they would only have to win two games to win the championship.
Merely increasing the transparency of weekly ratings, while beneficial, would be all-too-likely to exclude non-P5 teams in a 6-team system, and it wouldn't prevent the CFP from being dominated by one or two P5 conferences.
In Dodd's own example, a 6-team CFP would have included these teams in the past season:
................................................................................................................
1st round byes: Alabama & Clemson
1st round games:
(4) Notre Dame vs. (5) Texas A&M
(3) Ohio State vs. (6) Oklahoma
2nd round games:
Alabama vs. Notre Dame/TAMU winner (SEC vs. ACC or SEC team)
Clemson vs. Ohio St/Oklahoma winner (ACC vs. Big Ten or Big 12 team)
Championship game:
SEC or ACC team vs. SEC, ACC, Big Ten, or Big 12 team
Potential championship games between two teams from the same conference:
Alabama vs. Texas A&M
Clemson vs. Notre Dame
Total number of CFP games: 5 (3 rounds)
Number of conferences represented: Three.
Number of teams selected by committee: Four (100%).
................................................................................................................
Another obvious problem with Dodd's proposed remedy is that, in 2020-21, the field of playoff teams wouldn't have expanded at all beyond the narrow group of teams that have played in previous CFP series.
The biggest problem with Dodd's article is that - - throughout - - he seems to be much more concerned about which type of CFP system would be most agreeable to the top-tier P5 programs than he is about coming up with the best possible improvement to the CFP system.
................................................................................................................
An 5-1-2 type of CFP system would have resulted in a broader and more inclusive field of teams:
Conference champions: Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, (#10) Iowa State, (#17) USC, and (#8) Cincinnati
At-large teams: Notre Dame, Texas A&M
Round 1 2021 playoff games, based on 5-1-2 CFP system:
#1 Alabama vs. #17 USC
#2 Clemson vs. #10 Iowa State
#3 OSU vs. #8 Cincinnati
#4 Notre Dame vs. #5 Texas A&M
Total number of CFP games: 7 (3 rounds)
Number of conferences represented: Six.
Number of teams selected by committee: Two (25%).
................................................................................................................
Note that,
unlike Dodd's proposed 6-team CFP, which would have made it very possible for two SEC teams - - or two ACC - - teams to play in the national championship game, the 5-1-2 CFP system would have made such a scenario much less likely, since, for this to happen:
Both Clemson and Notre Dame would have had to win their first and second round games, and, if Alabama or TAMU had won their first round games, one or the other would have been eliminated in the semifinals.
Questions:
Would you have been interested in watching these four playoff games if they had been held?
#1 Alabama vs. #17 USC
#2 Clemson vs. #10 Iowa State
#3 OSU vs. #8 Cincinnati
#4 Notre Dame vs. #5 Texas A&M