(01-28-2021 11:58 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:53 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 05:55 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  That's just fascism 101. Eliminate all opposition.

All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

And yet her biggest critics are the same ones that want to block folks from going to church (while saying its ok for strip bars to be open), want to force folks to participate in ceremonies that go against their religion, want to attack the right to free speech/political dissent, and want to make laws to take guns away from law abiding citizens. These are all things that fly in the face of the same US Constitution you are seemingly so concerned about. Should those member be kicked out as well....because frankly, those folks are all an embarrassment to their districts as well. I mean--- if one cant even read the clear the specific "MAKE NO LAW" provisions of the US Constitution, then they really arent fit to be there.

What? Nothing that you said has anything to do with my comment.
Edit: sorry so late...yes you threw in gun control. No one is taking anyone’s guns away. Amazing after Obama nothing has changed. Lmao Q has lied to you. Time to accept it

lol...Nothing I said had anything to do with Qanon, which I honestly know nothing about (like most Republicans). Qanon is literally a tiny side show. In fact, the first time I ever even heard of it was when Savannah Guthrie asked Trump about it. On the other hand, the 1619 Project, the belief in "systemic" American racism, and the idea that Republicans are racist----these are all completely false unsupported unproven Democrat beliefs held by an actual majority of mainstream Democrats.

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 05:55 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  That's just fascism 101. Eliminate all opposition.

All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Liar, liar pants on fire.

None of us have called for Hank Johnson or AOC to resign. We just laugh at them.

(01-29-2021 09:51 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 09:31 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Unsure about expulsion but the woman 8s batshit crazy

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

If batshit crazy is the standard you just lost Pelosi and about every woman in the black congressional caucus.

Why just Pelosi and the black congressional caucus? Why exclude ones like Schumer and his dumb*** idea to use an emergency declaration to push more "climate change" policies or packing the courts because he doesn't like that liberals don't hold the majority there?

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 05:55 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  That's just fascism 101. Eliminate all opposition.

All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

(01-29-2021 11:44 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:58 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:53 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 05:55 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  That's just fascism 101. Eliminate all opposition.

All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

And yet her biggest critics are the same ones that want to block folks from going to church (while saying its ok for strip bars to be open), want to force folks to participate in ceremonies that go against their religion, want to attack the right to free speech/political dissent, and want to make laws to take guns away from law abiding citizens. These are all things that fly in the face of the same US Constitution you are seemingly so concerned about. Should those member be kicked out as well....because frankly, those folks are all an embarrassment to their districts as well. I mean--- if one cant even read the clear the specific "MAKE NO LAW" provisions of the US Constitution, then they really arent fit to be there.

What? Nothing that you said has anything to do with my comment.
Edit: sorry so late...yes you threw in gun control. No one is taking anyone’s guns away. Amazing after Obama nothing has changed. Lmao Q has lied to you. Time to accept it

lol...Nothing I said had anything to do with Qanon, which I honestly know nothing about (like most Republicans). Qanon is literally a tiny side show. In fact, the first time I ever even heard of it was when Savannah Guthrie asked Trump about it. On the other hand, the 1619 Project, the belief in "systemic" American racism, and the idea that Republicans are racist----these are all completely false unsupported unproven Democrat beliefs held by an actual majority of mainstream Democrats.

Lmao Q has been the source of most of the wacko conspiracy theories reps push. Pizza gate ring a bell?

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Pelosi's remarks were inflammatory and any good democrat knows you can't say anything that would hurt someone's feelings.
Most democrats don't understand the constitution.

(01-29-2021 11:46 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 05:55 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  That's just fascism 101. Eliminate all opposition.

All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Liar, liar pants on fire.

None of us have called for Hank Johnson or AOC to resign. We just laugh at them.

When have they invoked the constitution and been completely ignorant as to what it actually says, let alone being on the actual opposite side?

(01-29-2021 11:52 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Pelosi's remarks were inflammatory and any good democrat knows you can't say anything that would hurt someone's feelings.
Most democrats don't understand the constitution.

Inflammatory comments are bad now? Maybe you should have held trump to that standard. Then again, wouldn’t want to speak out against dear leader.

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Well you got that right. Pelosi doesn't understand the Constitution at all.

(01-29-2021 11:54 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:52 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Pelosi's remarks were inflammatory and any good democrat knows you can't say anything that would hurt someone's feelings.
Most democrats don't understand the constitution.

Inflammatory comments are bad now? Maybe you should have held trump to that standard. Then again, wouldn’t want to speak out against dear leader.

He is making fun of your hypocrisy on the matter. Subtlety doesn't work on the TDS impaired.

(01-29-2021 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Well you got that right. Pelosi doesn't understand the Constitution at all.

And here I thought we were talking about someone else. As I said deflect away!

(01-29-2021 11:57 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:54 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:52 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Pelosi's remarks were inflammatory and any good democrat knows you can't say anything that would hurt someone's feelings.
Most democrats don't understand the constitution.

Inflammatory comments are bad now? Maybe you should have held trump to that standard. Then again, wouldn’t want to speak out against dear leader.

He is making fun of your hypocrisy on the matter. Subtlety doesn't work on the TDS impaired.

Haha please show me where I have ever defended Pelosi. Until then own your hypocrisy, deflection game strong!

(01-29-2021 11:54 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:52 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Pelosi's remarks were inflammatory and any good democrat knows you can't say anything that would hurt someone's feelings.
Most democrats don't understand the constitution.

Inflammatory comments are bad now? Maybe you should have held trump to that standard. Then again, wouldn’t want to speak out against dear leader.

Apparently only when conservatives make them.

(01-29-2021 12:00 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:54 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:52 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:28 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  Not deflection. Just showing how rules seem to apply to some and not to others.

Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Pelosi's remarks were inflammatory and any good democrat knows you can't say anything that would hurt someone's feelings.
Most democrats don't understand the constitution.

Inflammatory comments are bad now? Maybe you should have held trump to that standard. Then again, wouldn’t want to speak out against dear leader.

Apparently only when conservatives make them.

Need some cheese with your whine? Always the victim

(01-29-2021 11:52 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:46 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Liar, liar pants on fire.

None of us have called for Hank Johnson or AOC to resign. We just laugh at them.

When have they invoked the constitution and been completely ignorant as to what it actually says, let alone being on the actual opposite side?

You were saying?

(01-29-2021 11:49 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:44 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:58 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:53 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-28-2021 11:34 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  All? Quite a stretch probably not even close. This woman actually thinks people needed to swear on the Bible to take an oath. According to her that is in the constitution, obviously she’s never read it nor cares about it. She’s an embarrassment to anyone who has ever sworn to uphold the constitution.

And yet her biggest critics are the same ones that want to block folks from going to church (while saying its ok for strip bars to be open), want to force folks to participate in ceremonies that go against their religion, want to attack the right to free speech/political dissent, and want to make laws to take guns away from law abiding citizens. These are all things that fly in the face of the same US Constitution you are seemingly so concerned about. Should those member be kicked out as well....because frankly, those folks are all an embarrassment to their districts as well. I mean--- if one cant even read the clear the specific "MAKE NO LAW" provisions of the US Constitution, then they really arent fit to be there.

What? Nothing that you said has anything to do with my comment.
Edit: sorry so late...yes you threw in gun control. No one is taking anyone’s guns away. Amazing after Obama nothing has changed. Lmao Q has lied to you. Time to accept it

lol...Nothing I said had anything to do with Qanon, which I honestly know nothing about (like most Republicans). Qanon is literally a tiny side show. In fact, the first time I ever even heard of it was when Savannah Guthrie asked Trump about it. On the other hand, the 1619 Project, the belief in "systemic" American racism, and the idea that Republicans are racist----these are all completely false unsupported unproven Democrat beliefs held by an actual majority of mainstream Democrats.

Lmao Q has been the source of most of the wacko conspiracy theories reps push. Pizza gate ring a bell?

Pizza gate? Never heard of it. Spygate---yes. Pizza gate? Not so much. Feel free to do a search of my posts....you'll find nary a mention of Pizza Gate by me beyond this post---which is simply a response to your question. Im telling you that Qanon stuff is virtually unknown in the Republican Party. Its just another freaky fringe group.

The "Q" followers on the board know she's a member of the republican sleeper cell. They won't admit it though.

(01-29-2021 12:33 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  The "Q" followers on the board know she's a member of the republican sleeper cell. They won't admit it though.

sleeper cell? really?

(01-29-2021 12:22 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:52 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:46 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 10:56 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 07:20 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Oh, you're right. I'm sure they'd not eliminate anyone who just shuts up and doesn't make waves.

But when you have the freaking speaker of the house calling anyone who supports Trump an "enemy of the state", I don't know... sounds kind've fascist to me.

Deflection game strong! Why bother defending idiocy? She’s a moron and has no business being a rep. If someone with a D next to her name said what she has you guys would all be calling for her resignation. Amazing anyone would try to defend her.

Liar, liar pants on fire.

None of us have called for Hank Johnson or AOC to resign. We just laugh at them.

When have they invoked the constitution and been completely ignorant as to what it actually says, let alone being on the actual opposite side?

You were saying?

Hey, AOC... if the Dems are so sure about Biden winning the electoral college they why did they engage in illegal practices during ballot counting and why have they been so opposed to forensic audits and transparency?

You worthless socialist.

(01-29-2021 12:02 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 12:00 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:54 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:52 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-29-2021 11:47 AM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  Pelosi has nothing to do with this woman. Deflection indeed. She swore to uphold a document that she’s either not read or doesn’t understand.

Pelosi's remarks were inflammatory and any good democrat knows you can't say anything that would hurt someone's feelings.
Most democrats don't understand the constitution.

Inflammatory comments are bad now? Maybe you should have held trump to that standard. Then again, wouldn’t want to speak out against dear leader.

Apparently only when conservatives make them.

Need some cheese with your whine? Always the victim

You seem as oblivious to double standards as you are to hypocrisy and common sense.