This has been out for a little while, but no one has read it yet?

Unhinged Dems introduced HR1 nationalizing elections, a bill to destroy the USA

Quote:Democrats introduced HR1, a bill that will destroy our country. It nationalizes the vote, and makes every corrupt form of voting legal, and ends voter ID nationwide. It allows ballot harvesting, felon voters, a path to DC statehood.

D.C. statehood will give Democrats two more senators almost immediately. That will then allow them to ram anything through, including making PR a state, giving them two more senators and a permanent Democrat electoral majority.

That majority and the power that comes with it is what open borders is about. It’s what the demonization of Trump and his supporters is about.

These people are absolutely neo-communists. No one but fascists, communists, Nazis would do something like this.

The bill would ensure Democrats win all elections in perpetuity. HR1 goes under the guise of protecting our elections, for the people.

The communistic bill includes:

-Internet-only registration with electronic signature submission. In other words, no voter ID.
-Nationwide ‘Motor Voter’ registration. If you get a driver’s license, you are automatically registered to vote.
-16-year-olds required to be registered to vote. Children voting is a big plus for Democrats.
-Nationwide same-day registration.
-Grants ($25M) for using minors in election activities. [brainwashing]
-Prohibiting attempts to clean voter rolls of non-residents.
-Murderers and rapists can vote.
-Mandatory early voting.
-Banning voter ID
-Roadwork for DC statehood and territory statehood.
-It gives federal workers [union people, mostly Democrats] SIX DAYS of paid vacation to work the polls.

MCCONNELL EXPLAINED IN 2019

In an op-ed at The Washington Post in January 2019, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called it the Democrat Politician Protection Act.

The hard-left loves the bill. It’s called For the People Act.

McConnell wrote: They’re trying to clothe this power grab with cliches about “restoring democracy” and doing it “For the People,” but their proposal is simply a naked attempt to change the rules of American politics to benefit one party.

They want to get rid of the neutral FEC and replace it with partisan federal workers.

Pelosi and company pitch new taxpayer subsidies, including a 600 percent government match for certain political donations and a new voucher program that would funnel even more public dollars to campaigns, he wrote. Since these monies traditionally go to Democrats, it’s a donation to Democrats.

The legislation dedicates hundreds of pages to federalizing the electoral process. It would make states mimic the practices that recently caused California to create 23,000 incorrect voter registrations. The measure would make it harder for states to fix inaccurate data in their voter rolls.

Link to the UnConstitutional Madness: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-cong...ill/1/text

The Democrats’ First Bill of 2021 Is to Lock In Fraudulent Election Maneuvers and Steal Elections in Perpetuity

Quote:Democrats introduce their first bill in the House: H.R.1 – The bill that will destroy America. Nationwide mail-in voting, banning restrictions on ballot harvesting, banning voter ID, criminal voters,DC Statehood roadwork, it’s all in here.

1) Internet-only registration with electronic signature submission.

“(a) Requiring Availability Of Internet For Online Registration.—Each State, acting through the chief State election official, shall ensure that the following services are available to the public at any time on the official public websites of the appropriate State and local election officials in the State, in the same manner and subject to the same terms and conditions as the services provided by voter registration agencies under section 7(a):

“(1) Online application for voter registration.

2) Banning the requirement to provide a full SSN for voter registration.

SEC. 1005. PROHIBITING STATE FROM REQUIRING APPLICANTS TO PROVIDE MORE THAN LAST 4 DIGITS OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. (a) Form Included With Application For Motor Vehicle Driver’s License.—Section 5©(2)(B)(ii) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20504©(2)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting the following: “, and to the extent that the application requires the applicant to provide a Social Security number, may not require the applicant to provide more than the last 4 digits of such number;”.

3) Nationwide ‘Motor Voter’ registration.

Note that motor voter registration is how thousands of illegal became registered voters in California and Nevada.

(2) DEFINITION.—The term “automatic registration” means a system that registers an individual to vote in elections for Federal office in a State, if eligible, by electronically transferring the information necessary for registration from government agencies to election officials of the State so that, unless the individual affirmatively declines to be registered, the individual will be registered to vote in such elections.

4) 16 year olds required to be registered to vote.

(d) Treatment Of Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age.—A State may not refuse to treat an individual as an eligible individual for purposes of this part on the grounds that the individual is less than 18 years of age at the time a contributing agency receives information with respect to the individual, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time. Nothing in the previous sentence may be construed to require a State to permit an individual who is under 18 years of age at the time of an election for Federal office to vote in the election.

5) Nationwide same-day registration.

“(1) REGISTRATION.—Each State shall permit any eligible individual on the day of a Federal election and on any day when voting, including early voting, is permitted for a Federal election—

“(A) to register to vote in such election at the polling place using a form that meets the requirements under section 9(b) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (or, if the individual is already registered to vote, to revise any of the individual’s voter registration information); and

“(B) to cast a vote in such election.

6) Grants ($25M) for using minors in election activities.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Election Assistance Commission (hereafter in this section referred to as the “Commission”) shall make grants to eligible States to enable such States to carry out a plan to increase the involvement of individuals under 18 years of age in public election activities in the State.

7) More children voters.

“(k) Acceptance Of Applications From Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age.—

“(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may not refuse to accept or process an individual’s application to register to vote in elections for Federal office on the grounds that the individual is under 18 years of age at the time the individual submits the application, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time.

8) Prohibiting attempts to clean voter rolls of non-residents.

It’s this whole section, but in particular, this part below basically says nobody is allowed to request voter rolls to be cleaned up. ie: making it illegal to do what Tom Fitton was doing.

“(1) REQUIREMENTS FOR CHALLENGES.—No person, other than a State or local election official, shall submit a formal challenge to an individual’s eligibility to register to vote in an election for Federal office or to vote in an election for Federal office unless that challenge is supported by personal knowledge regarding the grounds for ineligibility which is—

9) Murderers and rapists can vote.

(1) NOTIFICATION.—On the date determined under paragraph (2), each State shall notify in writing any individual who has been convicted of a criminal offense under the law of that State that such individual has the right to vote in an election for Federal office pursuant to the Democracy Restoration Act of 2021 and may register to vote in any such election and provide such individual with any materials that are necessary to register to vote in any such election.

10) Mandatory early voting.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Each State shall allow individuals to vote in an election for Federal office during an early voting period which occurs prior to the date of the election, in the same manner as voting is allowed on such date.

11) THE BIG ONE – NATIONWIDE VOTE BY MAIL, BAN ON BALLOT PROTECTION MEASURES, LEGALIZED LIMITLESS BALLOT HARVESTING.

“SEC. 307. PROMOTING ABILITY OF VOTERS TO VOTE BY MAIL.

“(a) Uniform Availability Of Absentee Voting To All Voters.—

“(1) IN GENERAL.—If an individual in a State is eligible to cast a vote in an election for Federal office, the State may not impose any additional conditions or requirements on the eligibility of the individual to cast the vote in such election by absentee ballot by mail.

“(2) ADMINISTRATION OF VOTING BY MAIL.—

“(A) PROHIBITING IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING BALLOT.—A State may not require an individual to provide any form of identification as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot, except that nothing in this paragraph may be construed to prevent a State from requiring a signature of the individual or similar affirmation as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot.

“(B) PROHIBITING REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE NOTARIZATION OR WITNESS SIGNATURE AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING OR CASTING BALLOT.—A State may not require notarization or witness signature or other formal authentication (other than voter attestation) as a condition of obtaining or casting an absentee ballot.

“(2) PERMITTING VOTERS TO DESIGNATE OTHER PERSON TO RETURN BALLOT.—The State—

“(A) shall permit a voter to designate any person to return a voted and sealed absentee ballot to the post office, a ballot drop-off location, tribally designated building, or election office so long as the person designated to return the ballot does not receive any form of compensation based on the number of ballots that the person has returned and no individual, group, or organization provides compensation on this basis; and

“(B) may not put any limit on how many voted and sealed absentee ballots any designated person can return to the post office, a ballot drop off location, tribally designated building, or election office.

12) Banning voter ID by replacing it with ‘I totes promise I’m not a degenerate rigger’ note.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection ©, if a State has in effect a requirement that an individual present identification as a condition of receiving and casting a ballot in an election for Federal office, the State shall permit the individual to meet the requirement—

“(A) in the case of an individual who desires to vote in person, by presenting the appropriate State or local election official with a sworn written statement, signed by the individual under penalty of perjury, attesting to the individual’s identity and attesting that the individual is eligible to vote in the election; or

13) Roadwork for DC statehood and territory statehood.

The whole subtitle.

Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood

Subtitle D—Territorial Voting Rights

14) COMPLETE CONGRESSIONAL TAKEOVER OF REDISTRICTING.

Subtitle E—Redistricting Reform

Also includes, of course, ‘racial profiling and promotion of inequality based solely on race’.

(B) ENSURING DIVERSITY.—In appointing the 9 members pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), as well as in designating alternates pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) and in appointing alternates to fill vacancies pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4), the first members of the independent redistricting commission shall ensure that the membership is representative of the demographic groups (including racial, ethnic, economic, and gender) and geographic regions of the State, and provides racial, ethnic, and language minorities protected under the Voting Rights Act of 1965 with a meaningful opportunity to participate in the development of the State’s redistricting plan.

I am running out of time and space, but please look at this section:

SEC. 3201. NATIONAL STRATEGY TO PROTECT UNITED STATES DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS. (a) In General.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary, in consultation with the Chairman, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Education, the Director of National Intelligence, the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission, and the heads of any other appropriate Federal agencies, shall issue a national strategy to protect against cyber attacks, influence operations, disinformation campaigns, and other activities that could undermine the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.

(b) Considerations.—The national strategy required under subsection (a) shall include consideration of the following:

(1) The threat of a foreign state actor, foreign terrorist organization (as designated pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189)), or a domestic actor carrying out a cyber attack, influence operation, disinformation campaign, or other activity aimed at undermining the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.

(3) Potential consequences, such as an erosion of public trust or an undermining of the rule of law, that could result from a successful cyber attack, influence operation, disinformation campaign, or other activity aimed at undermining the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.

Literally forming a commission to effectively freeze anyone who says that the election was rigged. Your free speech First Amendment Rights are GONE.

Link to the UnConstitutional Madness: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-cong...ill/1/text

I think the dems actually want a civil war.

Well, you've gotta fix it to where you always win or what's the point of being in power, right?

We don't need any violence--that's what the Dems want, since that is what they are doing over and over. We just need to begin organizing those state legislatures who are still rational together and start the process of a peaceful secession in an organized fashion. Give notice, take the US Constitution with us, and create a REAL Republic again, and let them tax themselves into oblivion. About 30 or more states will go, mostly in the South and heartland (what Dems have been derisively calling "flyover" country), and we can also be sure that Alberta, Canada, with all their oil, gas and natural resources will be anxious to join us. Then set a date, just like Britain did with Brexit, and start building the wall.

I'd like to take Nevada, but they can have Vegas if they want (we'll have Biloxi, MS and it can be built up pretty nice for us) plus we'll have FL, Texas and the coastal areas up to about MD. We get DC, since they hate all those marble statues and Founding Fathers so much, and we'll give them a few million leftover to build their "capitol" in their old "homeland" of CHAZ out of cardboard and plywood and such, like they already showed us they preferred. We get Virginia before it's too far gone--they can have Maryland even though they hate Catholics, ironically, and they can have Chicago, but we get the rest of Illinois. They'll take CO for a while, until those folks realize the cost of airlifting everything to their "island" isn't worth it, and beg to come back. They'll get the NE states, but we keep PA--they can have Philly if they really want it, but we get the Rocky statue back, and the penguins hockey team (they can keep the 6ers and the Phillies. Steelers will have to be negotiated, of course)

We'll have plenty of food with FL and the South, plenty of oil and gas to be energy independent with TX, PA, ND and OH valley, and plenty of coastline for our ports and Naval bases (we get Norfolk- they get San Diego and HI becomes their Except for pearl Harbor, which we require for defense against advance China attack, kind of like Guantanamo Bay... We get Alaska to go along with Alberta, Canada, maybe we can get another province to join as well, but they hate all the oil and such in AK so much they shouldn't be bothered. Not to many fairies there anyways as you have to be a man to survive that environment (just watch "Deadliest Catch" and guess how many beta-male liberals are on those boats--my guess is between zero and negative 500 to start.)

We can make laws promoting one-man, one woman marriage and the end of all abortions, and we can have low taxes and individual responsibility with limited government and a strong national defense. We get Cape Canaveral and now Huntsville, AL for President Trump's space force. They can do something over there with Boeing if they want to while they tax them out of business.

We can have cattle and chickens and all the carpet manufacturing, and they can grow their soy and $h!t in CA and see how strong that makes them when China comes calling on them.

With all their abortion, gang violence and starvation methods, I'll give what's left about 2 to 3 generations before they all die off, and we can just walk back in and annex them after they die off naturally (organically?)

That's a start, now, who's on board? Let's roll!

It will be interesting when we have the next presidential election and 500,000,000 ballots are cast.

(01-25-2021 06:32 PM)banker Wrote:  It will be interesting when we have the next presidential election and 500,000,000 ballots are cast.

Thanks to all that "new math" in Common core in the publik sjkrewls!

I think it is time to have a nationwide strike.

We all stay home for a week.

Let's show them what happens.

I think you're all overreacting.

(01-25-2021 09:07 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  I think you're all overreacting.

There is over reaction to this bill. Its garbage, a direct assault on the Constitution and open and fair elections.

Thankfully it has next to no chance in the Senate, even with Harris holding the tiebreaking vote.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

(01-25-2021 09:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(01-25-2021 09:07 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  I think you're all overreacting.

There is over reaction to this bill. Its garbage, a direct assault on the Constitution and open and fair elections.
Thankfully it has next to no chance in the Senate, even with Harris holding the tiebreaking vote.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

But isn't it disturbing that it even gets this far?

(01-25-2021 09:49 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-25-2021 09:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(01-25-2021 09:07 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  I think you're all overreacting.

There is over reaction to this bill. Its garbage, a direct assault on the Constitution and open and fair elections.
Thankfully it has next to no chance in the Senate, even with Harris holding the tiebreaking vote.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

But isn't it disturbing that it even gets this far?

Shouldn't the People have learned by now never to underestimate the enemy: We've analyzed their battle plan, and there is a weakness. Should we prepare the ships for evacuation? Not to overestimate their chances, but didn't we think it was impossible to actually steal a US election, & openly with their own admission and callous disregard for the US Constitution? I'd say the chances are greater than zero. And I'm tired of just pretending they'll go away. they are like cockroaches--if you don;t step on them, they multiply and eventually grow comfortable coming out in the light and spreading their disease among us.

Here's a recent photo of Democrazy "leaders" at the Capitol planning sessions in Peolsi's "office":

(01-25-2021 09:49 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-25-2021 09:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(01-25-2021 09:07 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  I think you're all overreacting.

There is over reaction to this bill. Its garbage, a direct assault on the Constitution and open and fair elections.
Thankfully it has next to no chance in the Senate, even with Harris holding the tiebreaking vote.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

But isn't it disturbing that it even gets this far?

Incredibly. The next two years is everything the libs have been working towards for decades. Obama was the primer, he knew a lot of what he really wanted couldn't get passed when he was in office without massive blowback. Now, 4 years later an extremely polarized nation is like a dry powder keg. All it takes is a spark.

Want to get rid of firearms, create a registry, require a license for ammo? All it would take is one or two high profile incidents for the dems to claim they have the moral authority to do so.

Open borders and amnesty? All the dems needs are 20000 migrants to the border, standing on the other side of the wall malnourished and sick to play the compassion card. The wall would be torn down, all allowed in and put on the welfare rules. Their relatives in the US granted amnesty so they can pursue their 'dreams'.

The list goes on and on. Make no mistake, the next two years will decide if the US survives as is, or a new US breaks away from the socialist shithole the libs are hell-bent on creating. They don't seek to govern, to be a representative body ofnthe people, for the people, they seek a lower class to rule over unchallenged.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I'm already formulating my exit plan.

I'm not living in 1984land