Can't wait to see this play out.

This EO is explicit to Title VII, but that doesn't mean you won't see other Title IX orders at some other point.

(01-21-2021 04:01 PM)Morkai Wrote:  This EO is explicit to Title VII, but that doesn't mean you won't see other Title IX orders at some other point.

Ok moron



That makes it better.

(01-21-2021 04:01 PM)Morkai Wrote:  This EO is explicit to Title VII, but that doesn't mean you won't see other Title IX orders at some other point.

It sure looks as if Title IX is included:

Quote:Under Bostock‘s reasoning, laws that prohibit sex discrimination — including Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), the Fair Housing Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), and section 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1522), along with their respective implementing regulations — prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, so long as the laws do not contain sufficient indications to the contrary.

Not going to end well. It seems that in the haste to "be equal" they didn't stop to think about what they are doing. This is only going to hurt women's teams and take away scholarships from deserving women. All in the name of "equality".

You are transphobic if you don't support this.

(01-21-2021 03:51 PM)Morkai Wrote:  

(01-21-2021 12:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Abigail Shrier
@AbigailShrier
·
11h
On day 1, Biden unilaterally eviscerates women's sports. Any educational institution that receives federal funding must admit biologically-male athletes to women's teams, women's scholarships, etc.

A new glass ceiling was just placed over girls.
https://twitter.com/AbigailShrier/status...2723666946

It would be funny if a D1 women's bball team had a team of 13 swinging dicks wearing wigs.

Of course, this isn't what the EO Biden signed does at all.

What does it do then? Seems like it's pretty accurate to me. What part is wrong? A male, who identifies female... CAN receive a FEMALE's scholarship.

Let's hear it Mork.

(01-21-2021 04:01 PM)Morkai Wrote:  This EO is explicit to Title VII, but that doesn't mean you won't see other Title IX orders at some other point.

You have have read it first then commented. Stop getting your stupid talking points from libtards on social media.

(01-21-2021 12:30 PM)Claw Wrote:  This is going to be a real issue with the lesbian portion of the Democratic Party.

Nope they have Stockholm syndrome. They and the feminist don't realize they are being sold out.

(01-21-2021 04:06 PM)ummechengr Wrote:  

(01-21-2021 04:01 PM)Morkai Wrote:  This EO is explicit to Title VII, but that doesn't mean you won't see other Title IX orders at some other point.

It sure looks as if Title IX is included:

Quote:Under Bostock‘s reasoning, laws that prohibit sex discrimination — including Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), the Fair Housing Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), and section 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1522), along with their respective implementing regulations — prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, so long as the laws do not contain sufficient indications to the contrary.

This is gonna be so much fun.

This is ONLY the BEGINNING, expect the next MANdate to be all campus residence halls must be opened to the gender they choose so lots of "ladyboys" living with girls.

(01-21-2021 12:21 PM)TheOriginalBigApp Wrote:  if you want 'equality', you gotta be prepared for the responsibility it brings.

Be careful what you ask for ladies, you just might get it.

To all those millennial girls and their over protective mothers who wanted Bitem I only have one thing to say, "tee hee".

Gotcha!

(01-21-2021 12:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Abigail Shrier
@AbigailShrier
·
11h
On day 1, Biden unilaterally eviscerates women's sports. Any educational institution that receives federal funding must admit biologically-male athletes to women's teams, women's scholarships, etc.

A new glass ceiling was just placed over girls.
https://twitter.com/AbigailShrier/status...2723666946

It would be funny if a D1 women's bball team had a team of 13 swinging dicks wearing wigs.

they don't have to wear a wig, don't really have to do anything except say they identify as female. If they identify as a homosexual female they can even keep their girlfriend.

I REALLY do not understand this.. and would love for one of our enlightened ones on the board to explain how this is good policy