Quote:Conservative commentator and former baseball star Curt Schilling says that AIG canceled his insurance policy over his “social media profile,” a new level of deplatforming not yet seen.

“We will be just fine, but wanted to let Americans know that @AIGinsurance canceled our insurance due to my “Social Media profile,” tweeted Schilling.

“The agent told us it was a decision made by and with their PR department in conjunction with management,” he added.

88 Comments
Conservative commentator and former baseball star Curt Schilling says that AIG canceled his insurance policy over his “social media profile,” a new level of deplatforming not yet seen.

“We will be just fine, but wanted to let Americans know that @AIGinsurance canceled our insurance due to my “Social Media profile,” tweeted Schilling.

“The agent told us it was a decision made by and with their PR department in conjunction with management,” he added.


While innumerable Trump supporters have lost their Twitter and Facebook accounts due to social media censorship and cancel culture, cases of individuals being cut off by banks and other financial services are now growing too.

The purge has gone beyond the realm of simply silencing people on major platforms for their opinions, but punishing them for expressing them by trying to make their lives unlivable.

Numerous respondents pointed out the obvious – that without insurance it’s impossible to mortgage a home or register a vehicle.

However, other leftists applauded the move and said that Schilling deserved it for his support of Trump.

“You’ve definitely earned it,” remarked one.

“I mean…. capitalism right? They calculated the risk and decided your premiums weren’t worth the long term exposure?” added another.

What happened to Schilling is yet another chilling example of how Chinese Communist social credit score system is being implemented in America.

In August 2019, the Communist state bragged about how it had prevented 2.5 million “discredited entities” from purchasing plane tickets and 90,000 people from buying high speed train tickets in the month of July alone.

Link

That's a new low, but then again these liberal companies keep trying to "outwoke" the other.

(01-13-2021 01:11 PM)No2rdame Wrote:  That's a new low, but then again these liberal companies keep trying to "outwoke" the other.

when one prints $$$, power corrupts...

@corpsCareNaught

Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

You really should go fuq yourself, comrade.

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

Well, that's a stupid and pointless comment. Congratulations.

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

like the fagoos....

watch what happens to the USD, biatch....

@stockValuation

G'dam, ewe fkrs are beyond stupid as ya flail in feces....

#muhTulips

(01-13-2021 01:17 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

You really should go fuq yourself, comrade.

You are really into your feeling today, snowflake.

(01-13-2021 01:20 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:17 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

You really should go fuq yourself, comrade.

You are really into your feeling today, snowflake.

naw man....he knows first target....

#chewOnThat r

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

Schilling isn't a spokesman for the AIG brand. AIG is the toxic brand, not Schilling.

Lol I mean I get when you don’t want someone representing your company in advertising if they’re polarizing in any way, but show of hands, who here knew Schilling had an AIG insurance policy? Nobody? Thought so. This is just petty.

Man, I’ll have to take him off my “insured by AIG - retired baseball fantasy team”.

What makes AIG think anyone knows or cares that they insure him? How does it impact their brand if no one knows, and they shouldn’t because that’s a confidential relationship.

What an incredibly scary road we seem to be heading on.

Will grocery stores refuse to sell people food?

I mean is this really where we want to go as a society

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

Yet Twitter lets the Ayatollah tweet? Please. That is beyond hypocritical and nonsense.

(01-13-2021 01:30 PM)solohawks Wrote:  What an incredibly scary road we seem to be heading on.

Will grocery stores refuse to sell people food?

I mean is this really where we want to go as a society

This is exactly where the liberals want to go as a society. Deranged mfers.

(01-13-2021 01:31 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

Yet Twitter lets the Ayatollah tweet? Please. That is beyond hypocritical and nonsense.

Thread is about Curt.

(01-13-2021 01:34 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:31 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

Yet Twitter lets the Ayatollah tweet? Please. That is beyond hypocritical and nonsense.

Thread is about Curt.

Point still stands.

(01-13-2021 01:26 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

Schilling isn't a spokesman for the AIG brand. AIG is the toxic brand, not Schilling.

He needs to shut up and play ball.

(01-13-2021 01:35 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:26 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

Schilling isn't a spokesman for the AIG brand. AIG is the toxic brand, not Schilling.

He needs to shut up and play ball.

And you need to sit down and let the adults speak. But, if you're too dense to understand the slippery slope of companies canceling you simply because they don't agree with you politically, let's spell it out in terms that even you or AOC could understand. Would it be wrong to be denied food service at a restaurant simply because you supported Pedo Joe? Would it be wrong to find out that you no longer have car insurance because you voted Democrat? What if you got denied a mortgage because you don't adhere to a specific political ideology? If you answered yes to any of these, then you should understand the issue here. If you answered no, then you've proven yourself to be dumber than AOC, which is quite an accomplishment.

(01-13-2021 01:14 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote:  Companies don't want to attach themselves to people with toxic brands.

like the public is loooking at their portfolio of individuals.