(05-10-2021 04:07 PM)Tomball Owl Wrote: Seems awfully complicated with the weighting and all. Seems like a runoff between the top 2 vote-getters and letting the voters decide how to redistribute or change their votes would be simpler/cleaner. But, hey, I respect the rights of VA and all states to hold elections as they wish.
I agree about the weighting system. I can see an argument for it in cases where there's concern over whether voters are acting in good faith, an issue that we have to some extent in Texas primaries when the Republican slate is mostly uncontested and some Republican voters try to get the Democratic Party to nominate whomever they believe is a worse candidate. At the same time, it also has the effect of cementing power in the constituencies that have historically voted for the party. If that's not a majority (and it was not in either of the most recent elections the Virginia GOP is using in this calculation), the party runs the risk of nominating insular candidates that can't win the general election.
The ranked choice system is a bit more complicated than first past the post or instant runoff, especially in counting, but it also gets outcomes closer to what people want and is cheaper than running a later runoff. Here's an example:
Code:
First Preference
Party Votes
Red 20
Blue 15
Yellow 17
Green 25
Total votes 77
To win 39
Here, we would have a runoff between Red and Green in a Texas-style election, but ranked-choice would take Blue's fifteen second choice votes like this:
Code:
Blue Second preference
Party Votes
Red 01
Yellow 14
Green 01
This shows that Blue supporters would much rather have Yellow than either Red or Green. Now, Yellow leads overall with 31 votes to Green's 26 and Red's 21. Instead of eliminating Yellow, we eliminate Red and distribute their votes to either Yellow or Green, whichever each voter named higher, after which one of the remaining two will have a majority.