https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/statu...29344?s=21

Almost. I was hoping for the Dukes Mayo bowl for the Mountaineers to make up for last year

Would this have been additional bowls or teams like Troy getting a bowl?

(12-20-2020 08:13 AM)rokamortis Wrote:  Would this have been additional bowls or teams like Troy getting a bowl?

I took it as teams playing in multiple bowls. For example, GS playing in NOLA one week and then playing in another bowl the following week.

If they're offered, I say accept. I'm sure our Seniors would cherish the opportunity to lace 'em up one more time. Particularly in a bowl we wouldn't normally have access too.

When once in a lifetime opportunities present themselves, you take it. Bring it on!

Brett sometimes misses the mark. I'm hoping for App accepting a second bowl. Be great for an opportunity to get 10 wins, beat a P5 and finish possibly ranked with all the opt outs happening

(12-20-2020 07:48 AM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote:  https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/statu...29344?s=21

That’s a shame if true. Would have liked to see App get an extra game in. Had to be a lack of financial support to offset expenses.

You would think that if they were going to allow 2 Bowl games, we could still get the SBC championship in as well as those teams play in bowls. We should have until the second week of January to make that happen.

(12-20-2020 09:59 AM)Usajags Wrote:  You would think that if they were going to allow 2 Bowl games, we could still get the SBC championship in as well as those teams play in bowls. We should have until the second week of January to make that happen.

Coastal doesnt want the game to happen.

(12-20-2020 10:26 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 09:59 AM)Usajags Wrote:  You would think that if they were going to allow 2 Bowl games, we could still get the SBC championship in as well as those teams play in bowls. We should have until the second week of January to make that happen.

Coastal doesnt want the game to happen.

A loss to us would cost chadwell and coaching staff all their incentive money

As long as we're talking multiple bowls, let Coastal and Cinci play for the NY6 spot.

If I understand correctly the idea was that UL/Coastal would play each other in a bowl game to essentially replay the SBC Title game, and then they would have played in their own separate bowls after that.

Feasibility with travel likely did that in.

(12-20-2020 10:26 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 09:59 AM)Usajags Wrote:  You would think that if they were going to allow 2 Bowl games, we could still get the SBC championship in as well as those teams play in bowls. We should have until the second week of January to make that happen.

Coastal doesnt want the game to happen.

Oh no, Coastal wants nothing more than to pound you guys to a pulp. They just prefer its done without a NY6 on the line.

(12-20-2020 12:42 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 10:26 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 09:59 AM)Usajags Wrote:  You would think that if they were going to allow 2 Bowl games, we could still get the SBC championship in as well as those teams play in bowls. We should have until the second week of January to make that happen.

Coastal doesnt want the game to happen.

Oh no, Coastal wants nothing more than to pound you guys to a pulp. They just prefer its done without a NY6 on the line.

And now....will they make it happen? Nope.

(12-20-2020 01:42 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 12:42 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 10:26 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 09:59 AM)Usajags Wrote:  You would think that if they were going to allow 2 Bowl games, we could still get the SBC championship in as well as those teams play in bowls. We should have until the second week of January to make that happen.

Coastal doesnt want the game to happen.

Oh no, Coastal wants nothing more than to pound you guys to a pulp. They just prefer its done without a NY6 on the line.

And now....will they make it happen? Nope.

Well no, because the 4 letter network controls the bowls and can veto it...

(12-20-2020 02:01 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 01:42 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 12:42 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 10:26 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 09:59 AM)Usajags Wrote:  You would think that if they were going to allow 2 Bowl games, we could still get the SBC championship in as well as those teams play in bowls. We should have until the second week of January to make that happen.

Coastal doesnt want the game to happen.

Oh no, Coastal wants nothing more than to pound you guys to a pulp. They just prefer its done without a NY6 on the line.

And now....will they make it happen? Nope.

Well no, because the 4 letter network controls the bowls and can veto it...

Why wouldn’t espn want to air #9 vs #16 in a bowl game? What better matchup will they get? There is a reason they loved the CCG to 2:30 on espn..they wanted the game

(12-20-2020 02:06 PM)Louisiana99 Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 02:01 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 01:42 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 12:42 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 10:26 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  Coastal doesnt want the game to happen.

Oh no, Coastal wants nothing more than to pound you guys to a pulp. They just prefer its done without a NY6 on the line.

And now....will they make it happen? Nope.

Well no, because the 4 letter network controls the bowls and can veto it...

Why wouldn’t espn want to air #9 vs #16 in a bowl game? What better matchup will they get? There is a reason they loved the CCG to 2:30 on espn..they wanted the game

ESPN Wants Coastal on TV. I don't think they care 1 lick about you guys unfortunately.

(12-20-2020 02:06 PM)Louisiana99 Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 02:01 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 01:42 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 12:42 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 10:26 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  Coastal doesnt want the game to happen.

Oh no, Coastal wants nothing more than to pound you guys to a pulp. They just prefer its done without a NY6 on the line.

And now....will they make it happen? Nope.

Well no, because the 4 letter network controls the bowls and can veto it...

Why wouldn’t espn want to air #9 vs #16 in a bowl game? What better matchup will they get? There is a reason they loved the CCG to 2:30 on espn..they wanted the game

They care enough to rank us #16

(12-20-2020 02:17 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 02:06 PM)Louisiana99 Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 02:01 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 01:42 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 12:42 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  Oh no, Coastal wants nothing more than to pound you guys to a pulp. They just prefer its done without a NY6 on the line.

And now....will they make it happen? Nope.

Well no, because the 4 letter network controls the bowls and can veto it...

Why wouldn’t espn want to air #9 vs #16 in a bowl game? What better matchup will they get? There is a reason they loved the CCG to 2:30 on espn..they wanted the game

ESPN Wants Coastal on TV. I don't think they care 1 lick about you guys unfortunately.

Yup. And this is what pisses the Cajuns off the most. They are absolutely an afterthought.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(12-20-2020 02:38 PM)rbarthle17 Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 02:17 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 02:06 PM)Louisiana99 Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 02:01 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(12-20-2020 01:42 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  And now....will they make it happen? Nope.

Well no, because the 4 letter network controls the bowls and can veto it...

Why wouldn’t espn want to air #9 vs #16 in a bowl game? What better matchup will they get? There is a reason they loved the CCG to 2:30 on espn..they wanted the game

ESPN Wants Coastal on TV. I don't think they care 1 lick about you guys unfortunately.

Yup. And this is what pisses the Cajuns off the most. They are absolutely an afterthought.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Apparently that is not the case! The Cajuns will be showcased on the ABC television network in the prime 2:30 PM time slot. A potential massive TV audience! UL will take that!