Is this a real question? Cincinnati.

(12-17-2020 09:17 AM)vick mike Wrote:  

(12-17-2020 05:22 AM)sierrajip Wrote:  

(12-17-2020 02:21 AM)mikeinoki Wrote:  Last Week's Results are up. LINK

I want to thank you and your work for putting up these threads. It has made the season so much more enjoyable. I hope you have a happy, and relaxing holiday season.

Amen, thank you brother mikeinoki!

You're welcome guys.

Cincinnati

(12-15-2020 09:30 PM)mikeinoki Wrote:  LAST WEEK'S RESULTS
Week 15 AAC Pick'em

6 players tied for first last week at 2-0

The Board was 36-28 or .563

The Board consensus was 1-1

2 - 0 BearcatJerry
2 - 0 goodknightfl
2 - 0 mikeinoki
2 - 0 T-Town Cane
2 - 0 bearcatfan
2 - 0 quo vadis
1 - 1 The Board
1 - 1 AusTxPony
1 - 1 Bearcatdh58
1 - 1 BraveKnight
1 - 1 bucblizzard
1 - 1 BullTime
1 - 1 CoastalJuan
1 - 1 coogrfan
1 - 1 Foreverandever
1 - 1 GoOwls111
1 - 1 Hurricane Drummer
1 - 1 Pony94
1 - 1 robertfoshizzle
1 - 1 RuckleSt
1 - 1 Sellular1
1 - 1 slhNavy91
1 - 1 Tigersmoke4
1 - 1 TripleA
1 - 1 TuCandoit
1 - 1 TyBull
1 - 1 vick mike
1 - 1 Westhoff123
1 - 1 panite
1 - 1 TCH51
1 - 1 TU 1978
0 - 2 J Coog
0 - 2 sierrajip

Pick Percentages
Houston was the upset pick this week with 56%
Navy 31 - Army 69
Houston 56 - Memphis 44

Season Totals
We've had 65 players with 2338 picks.
Our record is 1703-635, the second week or .728

Once again, coogrfan is the leader with BullTime remaining a half game back in second. BearcatJerry and RuckleSt are 1 game back in third.

The Board consensus for the season is 44-14

47 - 11 coogrfan
47 - 10 BullTime
46 - 12 BearcatJerry
46 - 12 RuckleSt
45 - 13 AusTxPony
45 - 13 Bearcatdh58
45 - 13 BraveKnight
45 - 12 bucblizzard
45 - 10 TyBull
44 - 14 The Board
44 - 14 J Coog
44 - 13 Hurricane Drummer
43 - 15 TripleA
42 - 16 Pony94
42 - 16 slhNavy91
42 - 16 TuCandoit
42 - 15 Westhoff123
42 - 14 GoOwls111
42 - 14 robertfoshizzle
41 - 17 mikeinoki
41 - 17 Sellular1
41 - 17 Tigersmoke4
41 - 16 sierrajip
41 - 15 vick mike
41 - 12 T-Town Cane
40 - 17 Foreverandever
40 - 16 goodknightfl
39 - 16 CoastalJuan
39 - 11 Memphis Yankee
37 - 15 TCH51
36 - 17 panite
36 - 12 bearcatfan
34 - 17 Crowley’s Ridge Tiger
34 - 15 BearcatMan
34 - 10 Tiger Joe
31 - 15 arsenio Billingham
30 - 14 Nameless
22 - 13 Carolina_Low_Country
22 - 11 Poseidon
21 - 15 billybobby777
21 - 8 CA Mustang
21 - 7 Edgebrookjeff
15 - 8 ECUGrad07
15 - 5 NoQuarterBrigade
14 - 8 MemphisTigerFreak
12 - 7 BullsFanInTX
11 - 12 8BitPirate
11 - 5 Cattidude
10 - 5 tigerjeb
5 - 4 GoldenFunk
5 - 3 invisiblehand
4 - 5 SMUleopold
4 - 0 SMUstang
2 - 2 emeraldcoastwave
2 - 1 cbhstiger
2 - 1 IamYourDad
2 - 1 otown
2 - 1 Sideshow2313
2 - 1 Stookey57
2 - 0 thedrowsyowl
2 - 0 UCFKnightfan08
2 - 0 quo vadis
1 - 1 JoeJag
1 - 1 TU 1978
0 - 1 Eagle4Christ
0 - 1 Rob3338

How is coogrfan the leader @ 47-11 when BullTime is 47-10?

(12-19-2020 08:33 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-15-2020 09:30 PM)mikeinoki Wrote:  Once again, coogrfan is the leader with BullTime remaining a half game back in second. BearcatJerry and RuckleSt are 1 game back in third.

47 - 11 coogrfan
47 - 10 BullTime

How is coogrfan the leader @ 47-11 when BullTime is 47-10?

Because BullTime has a higher winning perecentage, but was late and missed a pick. Imagine 2 people are picking any 2 games. The first picks both and goes 1-1. The second guy thinks one game is too hard to pick so he only picks one, and goes 1-0. It isn't fair to reward the second guy for skipping a pick. So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses, which sounds counterintuitive, but is really the only right way.

(12-19-2020 09:48 AM)mikeinoki Wrote:  

(12-19-2020 08:33 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-15-2020 09:30 PM)mikeinoki Wrote:  Once again, coogrfan is the leader with BullTime remaining a half game back in second. BearcatJerry and RuckleSt are 1 game back in third.

47 - 11 coogrfan
47 - 10 BullTime

How is coogrfan the leader @ 47-11 when BullTime is 47-10?

Because BullTime has a higher winning perecentage, but was late and missed a pick. Imagine 2 people are picking any 2 games. The first picks both and goes 1-1. The second guy thinks one game is too hard to pick so he only picks one, and goes 1-0. It isn't fair to reward the second guy for skipping a pick. So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses, which sounds counterintuitive, but is really the only right way.

"So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses," - yep, by your own words BullTime would be the winner. And even if he had picked the missed game wrong, he'd still be no worse than tied for the lead.

(12-16-2020 04:55 PM)bearcatmark Wrote:  I forgot to do these at the beginning of the year so i just let it go. But uc is going to beat the piss out of Tulsa. I almost feel bad about the beating the Tulsa fans are going to have to witness

We’re going to take Desmond Ritter and snap him in half like a toothpick.

(12-19-2020 10:27 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-19-2020 09:48 AM)mikeinoki Wrote:  

(12-19-2020 08:33 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-15-2020 09:30 PM)mikeinoki Wrote:  Once again, coogrfan is the leader with BullTime remaining a half game back in second. BearcatJerry and RuckleSt are 1 game back in third.

47 - 11 coogrfan
47 - 10 BullTime

How is coogrfan the leader @ 47-11 when BullTime is 47-10?

Because BullTime has a higher winning perecentage, but was late and missed a pick. Imagine 2 people are picking any 2 games. The first picks both and goes 1-1. The second guy thinks one game is too hard to pick so he only picks one, and goes 1-0. It isn't fair to reward the second guy for skipping a pick. So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses, which sounds counterintuitive, but is really the only right way.

"So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses," - yep, by your own words BullTime would be the winner. And even if he had picked the missed game wrong, he'd still be no worse than tied for the lead.

Most total wins is the first criteria. Most total losses is the second. Or to put it another way, you have to look at the wins first followed by the total number of picks. If you finish the season with one guy 47-10 and another guy 47-20, the 47-20 guy is ahead. If one guy is 47-10 and another guy is 48-3, the 48-3 guy is ahead. That's just how it is.

(12-19-2020 10:27 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-19-2020 09:48 AM)mikeinoki Wrote:  

(12-19-2020 08:33 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-15-2020 09:30 PM)mikeinoki Wrote:  Once again, coogrfan is the leader with BullTime remaining a half game back in second. BearcatJerry and RuckleSt are 1 game back in third.

47 - 11 coogrfan
47 - 10 BullTime

How is coogrfan the leader @ 47-11 when BullTime is 47-10?

Because BullTime has a higher winning perecentage, but was late and missed a pick. Imagine 2 people are picking any 2 games. The first picks both and goes 1-1. The second guy thinks one game is too hard to pick so he only picks one, and goes 1-0. It isn't fair to reward the second guy for skipping a pick. So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses, which sounds counterintuitive, but is really the only right way.

"So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses," - yep, by your own words BullTime would be the winner. And even if he had picked the missed game wrong, he'd still be no worse than tied for the lead.

How about saying:
Ranking is by most correct picks.
First tiebreaker is most total picks - rewarding consistency and presence

(12-15-2020 09:29 PM)mikeinoki Wrote:  All picks must be posted and EDITED before kickoff.
All times are Eastern.

Saturday 12.19.20
8:00 #23 Tulsa @ #9 Cincinnati ABC

Cincinnati

(12-19-2020 10:42 AM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(12-19-2020 10:27 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-19-2020 09:48 AM)mikeinoki Wrote:  

(12-19-2020 08:33 AM)Atlanta Wrote:  

(12-15-2020 09:30 PM)mikeinoki Wrote:  Once again, coogrfan is the leader with BullTime remaining a half game back in second. BearcatJerry and RuckleSt are 1 game back in third.

47 - 11 coogrfan
47 - 10 BullTime

How is coogrfan the leader @ 47-11 when BullTime is 47-10?

Because BullTime has a higher winning perecentage, but was late and missed a pick. Imagine 2 people are picking any 2 games. The first picks both and goes 1-1. The second guy thinks one game is too hard to pick so he only picks one, and goes 1-0. It isn't fair to reward the second guy for skipping a pick. So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses, which sounds counterintuitive, but is really the only right way.

"So you have to go with most total wins followed by most total losses," - yep, by your own words BullTime would be the winner. And even if he had picked the missed game wrong, he'd still be no worse than tied for the lead.

How about saying:
Ranking is by most correct picks.
First tiebreaker is most total picks - rewarding consistency and presence

I suppose if you wanted to say it succinctly, you could say that.

Cincinnati

So far its worked:

Cincinnati

I think I picked us once to win. We lost. If not it's still the trend.