The unofficial online home for fans of the University of Cincinnati Bearcats. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

Ironically, I don’t. But in the interest of smack... what ya got on the over under on his tenure at UCLA? I bet 3 yrs...

I think they give the 'lil man 4 years

Dunno, but little Mick is carryin' a big stick right now....

#24 UCLA 11-2 [7-0]
Oregon 9-2 [4-1]
USC 11-3 [5-2]
Colorado 11-4 [5-3]
Arizona 10-3 [4-3]
Stanford 8-5 [4-3]
Oregon St 7-5 [3-3]
Washington St 9-4 [2-4]
Utah 5-6 [2-5]
California 7-8 [2-6]
Arizona St 4-6 [1-3]
Washington 2-11 [1-7]

I'll preface with I don't have any ill will against Mick.. he was/is a good coach and seemed like it was time for both parties to move on

BUT, the problem was never his success during the regular season. We'll see what he can do with UCLA in March. the Bruins will be harder on him than the Bearcats were if he consistently gets bounced in the first or second round.

(01-22-2021 09:45 AM)dubcat14 Wrote:  I'll preface with I don't have any ill will against Mick.. he was/is a good coach and seemed like it was time for both parties to move on

BUT, the problem was never his success during the regular season. We'll see what he can do with UCLA in March. the Bruins will be harder on him than the Bearcats were if he consistently gets bounced in the first or second round.

Yeah, loved him November to February...hated him in March. UCLA will not abide his NCAAT record that he had here, as evidenced by how quickly they've bounced coaches with similar records.

It does help that the PAC 12 appears to be one of the worst iterations of a power conference in basketball in quite some time this year.