Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
PROPOSED 27 TEAM PLAYOFF
Author Message
esayem Offline
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 16,549
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 1240
I Root For: Olde Ironclad
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #21
RE: PROPOSED 27 TEAM PLAYOFF
(11-26-2020 05:16 PM)jedclampett Wrote:  
(11-26-2020 12:32 PM)esayem Wrote:  
(11-26-2020 11:08 AM)jedclampett Wrote:  
(11-26-2020 10:10 AM)esayem Wrote:  
(11-25-2020 11:37 AM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  Seems a little unfair that the SEC, Big 12, and ACC get to play schools who’ve had to win 2 rounds of play in games while they get to sit back and rest while the PAC 12 and Big Ten have to play each other.

5-1-2 is the way to go. Simple, elegant, very little decision making done by committees and you aren’t adding a bunch of extra games for fans to travel to and adding wear and tear on the student athletes.

Play the quarter finals in traditional bowl sites on/around NYD. Play the semis 7-10 days later. Play the NCG the weekend before the Super Bowl (but not on the same night that the Pro Bowl airs)

That’s definitely an improvement. I think the “1” should be non-P5, because independents shouldn’t be punished if they finish ahead of the “G5 champ” with a stronger schedule etc.

Only one slot for a non-P5 team is not going to make sense when there are two undefeated non-P5 teams in the AP Top 8- - Cincinnati and BYU - - as there are right now.

That type of idea might have seemed "generous" when it was made a part of the NY6 bowls, but times have changed.

Due to the steady increase in the number of non-P5 teams in the top 20 over the past half-decade, the playoffs would be considered more and more illegitimate and anachronistic with each passing year if there were to be a set rule stipulating that only one non-P5 team will have an opportunity to participate.

(11-26-2020 10:10 AM)esayem Wrote:  I think giving each conference an auto-bid would encourage some sensible realignment based on tradition and geography as well.

Apparently, by "each conference," you're referring to only five of the FBS conferences.

At the very least, an auto-bid should be granted to the top 6-ranked conferences. At present, that would include the P5 conferences and one G5 conference. In an eight-team playoff series, the other two slots should go to any top 8-ranked teams that finish the season with an undefeated record. If there are no such teams in the top 10, then one or two of the most highly-ranked teams in the top 10 that didn't win conference championships.

With 6 auto-bids, the eight 2020 teams would most likely be:

Probable ACC Champion - Notre Dame or Clemson
Probable Big Ten Champion - Ohio State
Probable Big 12 Champion - Oklahoma or Iowa State
Probable Pac-12 Champion - Oregon
Probable SEC Champion - Alabama
Probable Top G5 Champion - Cincinnati
At Large #1 - (#2) Notre Dame or (#4) Clemson
At Large #2 - (#8) BYU (by virtue of being Top 10 and undefeated)


However, there would be considerable controversy if teams that win conference championships don't finish the season in the top 10.

For example, Florida and TAMU wouldn't make the playoffs with 6 auto-bids (Alabama has locked in the SEC Championship), unless one of them beat the second-place ACC team (ND or Clemson).

If the PAC-12 champion (e.g., current #9 Oregon) ends up in the top 10, there wouldn't be such a controversy. However, the may not be a top 10 school that wins the Big-12 championship.

To deal with that type of scenario, the rules could be adjusted by eliminating a conference's automatic bid if the conference champion doesn't finish in the top 10, thus opening up an additional at-large bid.

For example, using 2020 as an example, unless Iowa State or Oklahoma finishes in the top 10, the Big-12's automatic bid would be forfeited, and either Florida or Texas A&M (whichever is most highly-ranked) would take that playoff spot.

.

You are incorrect on both accounts. The guarantee for a non-P5 wouldn’t prohibit another non-P5 from securing an at-large.

I literally wrote “10 auto-bids” in the next paragraph which outlines an NCAA sanctioned playoff. There are 10 conferences.

Well then...I have one more thing to be thankful for, this day!

An enlightened soul, at last!

Absolutely!

College football messed up in the early 80’s by not implementing an NCAA 1-A playoff.
11-26-2020 05:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
andy98 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 121
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 19
I Root For: all teams
Location:
Post: #22
RE: PROPOSED 27 TEAM PLAYOFF
For an 8 team playoff:
The top 6 highest rated conference champions plus 2 at large teams.

For a 12 team playoff:
All 10 conference champions plus 2 at-large teams.

For a 16 team playoff:
All 10 conference champions plus 6 at-large teams.
12-01-2020 09:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.