Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
Author Message
Fort Bend Owl Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,617
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 329
I Root For: An easy win
Location:

The Parliament Awards
Post: #1
Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."
(This post was last modified: 11-21-2020 08:21 PM by Fort Bend Owl.)
11-21-2020 08:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


UTSAMarineVet09 Online
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 14,536
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1022
I Root For: UTSA
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Post: #2
Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."


The Trump legal team hasn’t even filed 30 cases... where do y’all get your information from?!? This is getting ridiculous that some posters here spew the same nonsense that the mainstream media does. At some point, you need to do your own research.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
11-21-2020 08:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fort Bend Owl Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,617
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 329
I Root For: An easy win
Location:

The Parliament Awards
Post: #3
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
Oh and I forgot to say the judge dismissed it with prejudice. I believe that means they can't refile a lawsuit in PA? Perhaps it means that they can bring it to a higher court, but from what I'm reading, words to that effect usually mean the judge is highly p.o.'ed about his or her time being wasted with a frivolous lawsuit.
11-21-2020 08:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 28,674
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 2298
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
lulz....only idiots believe trump has lost 30 cases,
11-21-2020 08:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Claw Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,041
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 619
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
Post: #5
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
His reference to the number of votes may be the undoing of his ruling. Nothing in any election law is in any way dependent on the number of votes involved.
11-21-2020 08:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fort Bend Owl Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,617
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 329
I Root For: An easy win
Location:

The Parliament Awards
Post: #6
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 08:23 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."


The Trump legal team hasn’t even filed 30 cases... where do y’all get your information from?!? This is getting ridiculous that some posters here spew the same nonsense that the mainstream media does. At some point, you need to do your own research.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/us/po...d=tw-share

2-34 now. Nice .059 batting average.
11-21-2020 08:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


UTSAMarineVet09 Online
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 14,536
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1022
I Root For: UTSA
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Post: #7
Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 08:36 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:23 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."


The Trump legal team hasn’t even filed 30 cases... where do y’all get your information from?!? This is getting ridiculous that some posters here spew the same nonsense that the mainstream media does. At some point, you need to do your own research.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/us/po...d=tw-share

2-34 now. Nice .059 batting average.


I guess the New York Times has better knowledge of the Trump cases than the pacer website... 07-coffee3


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
11-21-2020 08:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 28,674
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 2298
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
the judge was appointed by obama. wonder why they left that out?
11-21-2020 08:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 33,735
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1719
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."

I always thought the remedy requested made no sense. What made better sense to me as a remedy would be a reverification of signature match given the number of mail in ballots were so relevant in the outcome and prone to fraud.
(This post was last modified: 11-21-2020 08:45 PM by Attackcoog.)
11-21-2020 08:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 28,674
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 2298
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
Trump Team has responded.

“Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.

"We will be seeking an expedited appeal to the Third Circuit.
11-21-2020 08:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UTSAMarineVet09 Online
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 14,536
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1022
I Root For: UTSA
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Post: #11
Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 08:46 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Trump Team has responded.

“Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.

"We will be seeking an expedited appeal to the Third Circuit.


Bahahahahahahaha shhh don’t tell the libtards that! They think they just won the World Series!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
11-21-2020 08:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Was SoMs Eagle Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 584
Joined: Oct 2020
Reputation: 46
I Root For: Mustard Buzzard
Location:
Post: #12
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
The law is clear on this. The judge is saying it will disenfranchise voters. But by the constitution these votes are invalid because the decision to allow them was not made by the state legislature. There is no way I see the SCOTUS ruling against the Trump lawyers. Local laws are one thing. The constitution is another. And guess which one TRUMPS the other.
The very constitution is at stake here.
11-21-2020 09:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
green Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,399
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 197
I Root For: Miami
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 08:36 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:23 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."


The Trump legal team hasn’t even filed 30 cases... where do y’all get your information from?!? This is getting ridiculous that some posters here spew the same nonsense that the mainstream media does. At some point, you need to do your own research.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/us/po...d=tw-share

2-34 now. Nice .059 batting average.



https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status...0993229837

DIY
11-21-2020 09:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UTSAMarineVet09 Online
Corporal of the Board.
*

Posts: 14,536
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1022
I Root For: UTSA
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Post: #14
Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 09:43 PM)green Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:36 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:23 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."


The Trump legal team hasn’t even filed 30 cases... where do y’all get your information from?!? This is getting ridiculous that some posters here spew the same nonsense that the mainstream media does. At some point, you need to do your own research.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/us/po...d=tw-share

2-34 now. Nice .059 batting average.



https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status...0993229837

DIY

dumb*** posters that just spew media talking points instead of doing their own research...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
11-21-2020 09:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 33,735
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1719
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #15
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 09:49 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 09:43 PM)green Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:36 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:23 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."


The Trump legal team hasn’t even filed 30 cases... where do y’all get your information from?!? This is getting ridiculous that some posters here spew the same nonsense that the mainstream media does. At some point, you need to do your own research.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/us/po...d=tw-share

2-34 now. Nice .059 batting average.



https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status...0993229837

DIY

dumb*** posters that just spew media talking points instead of doing their own research...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That would include the media who simply repeat DNC talking points like they are stone tablets of truth passed forth by the very hand of God.
11-21-2020 10:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Was SoMs Eagle Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 584
Joined: Oct 2020
Reputation: 46
I Root For: Mustard Buzzard
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 09:49 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 09:43 PM)green Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:36 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:23 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."


The Trump legal team hasn’t even filed 30 cases... where do y’all get your information from?!? This is getting ridiculous that some posters here spew the same nonsense that the mainstream media does. At some point, you need to do your own research.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/us/po...d=tw-share

2-34 now. Nice .059 batting average.



https://twitter.com/JennaEllisEsq/status...0993229837

DIY

dumb*** posters that just spew media talking points instead of doing their own research...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

They must be using Dominion machines to keep count of the lawsuits....
11-21-2020 10:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Redbanksdog Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,536
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 282
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 08:21 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsyl...-biden-win

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann (a Republican) in Williamsport, Penn., rejected a request by the Trump campaign for an injunction that would stop the certification of the election as the campaign seeks to overturn that state's results. PA will be certified Monday.

For those keeping track, that's 30 losses by the Trump legal team and two (minor) victories. Any more winning and the Trump team might have a chance to take on the 1962 Mets.

Here's part of the judge's ruling.

"Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated, “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened," "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence."

You are Wrong
11-22-2020 12:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DavidSt Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,190
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 219
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #18
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-21-2020 08:42 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  the judge was appointed by obama. wonder why they left that out?

Several cases came up to Trump's appointed judges that also ruled against Trump. Trump wants the judges to take away the Constitutional rights of voting from citizens who are legal to vote. Do you think it is right to toss out all the votes of certain counties in all 50 states? Right now, you have Republicans in these states fighting back at Trump.
11-22-2020 02:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JMUDunk Offline
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud
*

Posts: 24,220
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 1200
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
Post: #19
Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
...

Good grief.

M gosh
11-22-2020 03:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Was SoMs Eagle Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 584
Joined: Oct 2020
Reputation: 46
I Root For: Mustard Buzzard
Location:
Post: #20
RE: Republican judge hands Trump legal team another resounding loss
(11-22-2020 03:38 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  ...

Good grief.

M gosh



11-22-2020 07:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2020 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2020 MyBB Group.