(11-22-2020 09:23 PM)BEARCATDALE Wrote:  

(11-20-2020 04:42 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  In jail for what??? Shooting a few pieces of garbage who attacked him? Whatever. Hope he sues the snot out of Kenosha and the media and uses the $$ to open his own gun range.

Amazing how you can open fire into a crowd of progressives and hit a pedophile, a rapist/woman beater and a career criminal.

Of course people do not know who these people that got killed, and they could find arrest records of people with the same name, and used it to make the victims look bad online. This is what happened with people who voted legally and Trump's people called them dead.

(11-23-2020 01:10 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  I would go for the death penalty on this guy. This guy do not live in Wisconsin.

Yes, he absolutely should have let those people beat and kill him instead.

(11-23-2020 01:10 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  I would go for the death penalty on this guy. This guy do not live in Wisconsin.

WI doesn’t have the death penalty.

Using residence as the basis for the severity of punishments of state law (higher sentence for non-residents) would get torpedoed in federal court.

(11-23-2020 01:12 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 09:23 PM)BEARCATDALE Wrote:  

(11-20-2020 04:42 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  In jail for what??? Shooting a few pieces of garbage who attacked him? Whatever. Hope he sues the snot out of Kenosha and the media and uses the $$ to open his own gun range.

Amazing how you can open fire into a crowd of progressives and hit a pedophile, a rapist/woman beater and a career criminal.

Of course people do not know who these people that got killed, and they could find arrest records of people with the same name, and used it to make the victims look bad online. This is what happened with people who voted legally and Trump's people called them dead.

Their criminal records have no bearing on the legal case, unless the legal team tries to get the first ones history introduced to show a history of violence.

The first one is easy to verify, they even include a picture.
https://inmatedatasearch.azcorrections.g...?ID=172556

Generally the one that conservatives are smearing without proof is the guy that got shot in the arm. They keep calling him a convicted felon when he was only convicted of a misdemeanor.

Yea, misdemeanor, felon, whatever.

He only had a pistol pointed square at a scared kid, flat on his back on the ground. Completely defenseless other than his own weapon (thankfully).

Wouldn’t want to sully that guys professional profile or anything.

(11-23-2020 01:10 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  I would go for the death penalty on this guy. This guy do not live in Wisconsin.

I thought liberals hated the death penalty?

Good to know you're letting the truth out that you're okay with the death penalty, as long as you're using it to off conservatives.

(11-23-2020 09:38 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(11-23-2020 01:10 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  I would go for the death penalty on this guy. This guy do not live in Wisconsin.

I thought liberals hated the death penalty?

Good to know you're letting the truth out that you're okay with the death penalty, as long as you're using it to off conservatives.

..... And unborn babies

(11-23-2020 01:10 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  I would go for the death penalty on this guy. This guy do not live in Wisconsin.

Based upon what?

Kindly state your prima facie case for any crime involving a potential death penalty. State the required elements for such crime and your evidence proving each of those elements.

(11-23-2020 12:49 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-23-2020 01:10 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  I would go for the death penalty on this guy. This guy do not live in Wisconsin.

Based upon what?

Kindly state your prima facie case for any crime involving a potential death penalty. State the required elements for such crime and your evidence proving each of those elements.

OWL stop - you are asking this of someone who supports killing unborn infants because the parents forgot birth control and made life creating decision.