(11-19-2020 09:00 PM)GoodOwl Wrote: Again, the Dems and MSM now argue that, although the results may have been incorrect and fraudulent and against the law, now the law must be followed so that those fraudulent results can be entered.
(11-19-2020 08:55 PM)banker Wrote: I have no doubt that those totals are an accurate count of all the votes they had. Now, were all those votes legitimate, each cast by an eligible state resident, who was alive at the time of the vote, filled out by said voter with said voter filling out no more than one vote? Seriously doubt it.
One woman was accused of voter fraud by the Trump team in Georgia because they said she was dead. In fact, she shared the same name as another woman who died in Fulton County. This happened in all the states that Trump tried to sue. Trump haveHAS been making mistakes with these names which proved they were legal voters who are alive and in cases that names were presented who were actually dead that the Republicans in those states showed that the dead did not vote. Some hardcore Trump supporters said that they have not seen any fraud and all that. It is time to move on and let Biden ruIn the country now.
How do you accuse a dead woman of voting? And FIFY...
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2020 04:33 PM by TigerBlue4Ever.)
I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
The Georgia Secretary of State issued a correction Friday afternoon, saying this state is still completing the certification process,
despite an earlier announcement that the state had certified an electoral victory for Joe Biden.
He submitted it for certification to the governor but the governor said a court ruling said he had to sign it before his final he was encouraging the Secretary of State to do an audit of absentee ballot signatures
(11-20-2020 05:24 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote: The Georgia Secretary of State issued a correction Friday afternoon, saying this state is still completing the certification process,
despite an earlier announcement that the state had certified an electoral victory for Joe Biden.
Quote:"With the certification, the two business-day time period begins for a candidate who lost by less than 0.5% of the vote to request a recount.
Certification does not preclude the state from continuing any current investigations related to the General Election or from pursuing any further allegations that may arise from these election."
Hmmmm, so covering his own @$$$ but admitting that the Georgia Election is NOT over and still subject to scrutiny and to be changed.
(11-19-2020 08:24 PM)Claw Wrote: We'll see what happens next.
Isn't this one of the magic-stop-counting states?
You have to establish what votes were counted first before you start attacking them.
Dude, this was a hand recount. So you can stop with this completely made up bull****. Nobody altered the counting machines in Georgia in the middle of the night. This result prove it.
Come on, man. When 100's of thousands of ballots appear in multiple states immediately after all those states "stop counting", you don't think that's suspicious?
Come on, man. What if people in the facilities at all those states sign affidavits saying they saw illegal and/or suspicious activities and ballots during that time?
Come on, man. What if thousands of ballots that showed up when they "weren't counting" were all on different paper? And looked they were machine marked rather than hand marked? And only had votes for Biden with nothing down ticket? And all of them were for Biden with literally zero for Trump?
Come on, man. If everything shown above is shown in court to have happened, are you still going to close your eyes and keep clinging to your gun control and communism?
Come on, man.
Trump appointed judges threw the cases out of court because the people who claimed these things lied about what they saw.
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
Thats what I see. The validity of the mail in ballots, which represent the most likely source of the fraud, are not being reviewed. Once you start delving into the details of how signatures are being verified---the standards have been watered down to the point of being largely worthless. In some cases the sensitivity of the computers doing the comparison has been turned down so far that they are effectively approving most anything. In other cases, the signature just needs to match the ballot request--not the signature on the actual voter registration rolls. In some cases, the technology is misused (ie--requires a signature saved at 300 dpi for the comparison to be valid when the signature data base is only scanned at 200dpi). The signature match protections sound real good when you just say there are signature match protections---but they look a lot less impressive when you get into the actual details of how those protections are poorly executed---or in some cases---completely undermined by last minute Covid rule changes.
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2020 06:47 PM by Attackcoog.)
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
Its also illegal to send an illegal ballot. You have to show an ID to prove who you are at any in person polling station. Frankly, you should have to show up in person with a valid photo ID somewhere in the mail in ballot process if we are to have equal protection under the law. Otherwise, its illegal as it fails to meet the equal protection clause under the constitution.
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2020 06:52 PM by Attackcoog.)
(11-20-2020 05:24 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote: The Georgia Secretary of State issued a correction Friday afternoon, saying this state is still completing the certification process,
despite an earlier announcement that the state had certified an electoral victory for Joe Biden.
(11-19-2020 08:24 PM)Claw Wrote: We'll see what happens next.
Isn't this one of the magic-stop-counting states?
You have to establish what votes were counted first before you start attacking them.
Dude, this was a hand recount. So you can stop with this completely made up bull****. Nobody altered the counting machines in Georgia in the middle of the night. This result prove it.
Come on, man. When 100's of thousands of ballots appear in multiple states immediately after all those states "stop counting", you don't think that's suspicious?
Come on, man. What if people in the facilities at all those states sign affidavits saying they saw illegal and/or suspicious activities and ballots during that time?
Come on, man. What if thousands of ballots that showed up when they "weren't counting" were all on different paper? And looked they were machine marked rather than hand marked? And only had votes for Biden with nothing down ticket? And all of them were for Biden with literally zero for Trump?
Come on, man. If everything shown above is shown in court to have happened, are you still going to close your eyes and keep clinging to your gun control and communism?
Come on, man.
Trump appointed judges threw the cases out of court because the people who claimed these things lied about what they saw.
Uh hunh.
So, when do we expect the perjury charges?
Do you just make this schit up or is it spoon fed to you by some other dolt?
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
The one thing that doesn't change is fingerprints/thumbprints. And the technology to get photo, signature, and thumbprints stored electronically in a database and on the voter registration card is available and not super expensive. Then we just need to make sure they are always checked.
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
The one thing that doesn't change is fingerprints/thumbprints. And the technology to get photo, signature, and thumbprints stored electronically in a database and on the voter registration card is available and not super expensive. Then we just need to make sure they are always checked.
Frankly hilarious. We have a ton of people saying the government is trying to control them by getting them to wear masks during a Pandemic, but you think people will willingly give up their fingerprints.
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
The one thing that doesn't change is fingerprints/thumbprints. And the technology to get photo, signature, and thumbprints stored electronically in a database and on the voter registration card is available and not super expensive. Then we just need to make sure they are always checked.
Frankly hilarious. We have a ton of people saying the government is trying to control them by getting them to wear masks during a Pandemic, but you think people will willingly give up their fingerprints.
They have a right to vote, but they don't have to.
And we should all be wearing masks. Japan did nothing but wear masks (they do all the time anyway) and they have had fewer cases permission than we have had deaths per million. The real government control to worry about is the shutdowns. If everybody wears masks, no need to shut down.
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
The one thing that doesn't change is fingerprints/thumbprints. And the technology to get photo, signature, and thumbprints stored electronically in a database and on the voter registration card is available and not super expensive. Then we just need to make sure they are always checked.
Frankly hilarious. We have a ton of people saying the government is trying to control them by getting them to wear masks during a Pandemic, but you think people will willingly give up their fingerprints.
They have a right to vote, but they don't have to.
And we should all be wearing masks. Japan did nothing but wear masks (they do all the time anyway) and they have had fewer cases permission than we have had deaths per million. The real government control to worry about is the shutdowns. If everybody wears masks, no need to shut down.
(11-20-2020 06:34 PM)DavidSt Wrote: You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
The one thing that doesn't change is fingerprints/thumbprints. And the technology to get photo, signature, and thumbprints stored electronically in a database and on the voter registration card is available and not super expensive. Then we just need to make sure they are always checked.
Frankly hilarious. We have a ton of people saying the government is trying to control them by getting them to wear masks during a Pandemic, but you think people will willingly give up their fingerprints.
They have a right to vote, but they don't have to.
And we should all be wearing masks. Japan did nothing but wear masks (they do all the time anyway) and they have had fewer cases permission than we have had deaths per million. The real government control to worry about is the shutdowns. If everybody wears masks, no need to shut down.
I agree with you there.
Japan is an island nation that is able to easily and effectively close its borders.
I would say that probably had more positive effect
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
You have to submit a copy of your ID to enter the gosh-danged Peachtree Road Race 10K in Atlanta--but voting: "we don't care to even see if you're real, much less alive! go for it!" What a Sham!
You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
Its also illegal to send an illegal ballot. You have to show an ID to prove who you are at any in person polling station. Frankly, you should have to show up in person with a valid photo ID somewhere in the mail in ballot process if we are to have equal protection under the law. Otherwise, its illegal as it fails to meet the equal protection clause under the constitution.
(11-20-2020 05:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I don't see any way for Trump to pull this out. What he needs is not recounts, but ways to challenge possibly fraudulent ballots, and once they get into the system, they are virtually impossible to remove. The time to act would have been 2017-18, when republicans held both houses of congress. But democrats and their Deep State allies succeeded in stalling things with the Mueller charade.
If republicans retain the senate, I think they can keep Biden from ruining the country--if Milquetoast Mitch can show some leadership for a change. And if republican can keep the senate and take the house in 2022, I think they can restrain even Kamala the ****. But we are on a narrow knife edge, and tis could all go terribly wrong in a short time.
You would be throwing out legal voters who have signitures that changes through time. That is what you call voting surpressing which should be illegal.
Its also illegal to send an illegal ballot. You have to show an ID to prove who you are at any in person polling station. Frankly, you should have to show up in person with a valid photo ID somewhere in the mail in ballot process if we are to have equal protection under the law. Otherwise, its illegal as it fails to meet the equal protection clause under the constitution.
You have to submit a copy of your ID to enter the gosh-danged Peachtree Road Race 10K in Atlanta--but voting: "We don't care to even see if you're real, much less alive! Go for it!" What a Sham!
"Artists:" Kristy and Jimmy McNichol
Album: Kristy & Jimmy McNichol
Song: "Go For It!"
1978 RCA Records
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2020 09:25 PM by GoodOwl.)
