Is it 500, 5000 votes, 10000, 100,000?

And who determines this?

1 is too many for me.

The MSM reports anyone and everyone that claims that they've seen no evidence of voter fraud.

WLW out of Cincinnati in their noon news report today felt compelled to report that former republican senator Saxby Chambliss said that he'd seen no evidence of voter fraud in the Georgia elections.

... Well if Saxby Chambliss says so.

(11-17-2020 06:34 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  The MSM reports anyone and everyone that claims that they've seen no evidence of voter fraud.

WLW out of Cincinnati in their noon news report today felt compelled to report that former republican senator Saxby Chambliss said that he'd seen no evidence of voter fraud in the Georgia elections.

... Well if Saxby Chambliss says so.

In fairness, he was the same distance from the vote counters as the Republican monitors.

When it goes to 11

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

(11-17-2020 06:36 PM)banker Wrote:  

(11-17-2020 06:34 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  The MSM reports anyone and everyone that claims that they've seen no evidence of voter fraud.

WLW out of Cincinnati in their noon news report today felt compelled to report that former republican senator Saxby Chambliss said that he'd seen no evidence of voter fraud in the Georgia elections.

... Well if Saxby Chambliss says so.

In fairness, he was the same distance from the vote counters as the Republican monitors.

I think what I was getting at is that they'd have never reported it if he' said he'd seen fraud.

They're all just cramming their desired results down our throats.

SEE! SEE! NO FRAUD HERE!!!

I believe the term Voter Fraud is incorrect. That would,indicated that there are fraudulent individual voters.

This is actually Vote Fraud. Where a few individuals are manipulating 1,000’s of votes dare I say 10,000’s or even 100,000’s of votes.

(11-17-2020 06:38 PM)fsquid Wrote:  When it goes to 11

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Why not 10?

(11-17-2020 06:34 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  The MSM reports anyone and everyone that claims that they've seen no evidence of voter fraud.

WLW out of Cincinnati in their noon news report today felt compelled to report that former republican senator Saxby Chambliss said that he'd seen no evidence of voter fraud in the Georgia elections.

... Well if Saxby Chambliss says so.

If you are talking about the news updates every half an hour IHeart is using ABC and NBC I believe.. The guy at ABC is awful Michael Castner spell check. What they choose to cover, how and they slip in opinion. Castner loves to say Trump said, without any evidence, ................... A couple of years ago I heard Aaron Katersky ABC news say on 700 that NFL players are indentured servants.

(11-17-2020 04:30 PM)DFWMINER Wrote:  Is it 500, 5000 votes, 10000, 100,000?

And who determines this?

Obviously Tom does.....

When it changes a result or results. "Landslide Lyndon" was 200 votes, but IIRC he won statewide by 113, so it was enough. JFK in Chicago in 1960 was almost certainly more, but impossible to prove.

Reality? I Have my doubts that any court could bring itself to admit it for fear that the entire system would be undermined.

(11-18-2020 06:39 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  I believe the term Voter Fraud is incorrect. That would,indicated that there are fraudulent individual voters.

This is actually Vote Fraud. Where a few individuals are manipulating 1,000’s of votes dare I say 10,000’s or even 100,000’s of votes.

I user the terms Voter Fraud and Election Fraud, but I agree with your assessment.

(11-18-2020 07:39 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-17-2020 04:30 PM)DFWMINER Wrote:  Is it 500, 5000 votes, 10000, 100,000?

And who determines this?

Obviously Tom does.....

Yet, he is avoiding this thread like he avoids his job during work hours...

(11-18-2020 09:10 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Reality? I Have my doubts that any court could bring itself to admit it fo fear that the entire system would be undermined.

Bingo!

No one outside of Trump has any incentive for any fraud to be addressed on a large scale.

If the public loses faith in fair elections the society as a whole will be radically changed at the core

(11-18-2020 09:50 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-18-2020 09:10 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Reality? I Have my doubts that any court could bring itself to admit it fo fear that the entire system would be undermined.

Bingo!

No one outside of Trump has any incentive for any fraud to be addressed on a large scale.

If the public loses faith in fair elections the society as a whole will be radically changed at the core

That faith is already lost. Look at your country, people are pissed because of the fraud. If the institutions accept it, there will be an ugly outcome.