has it been released?

(11-17-2020 01:44 PM)fsquid Wrote:  has it been released?

It's must be the lesser known sloth kraken. They are very I'll tempered though.

(11-17-2020 01:48 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-17-2020 01:44 PM)fsquid Wrote:  has it been released?

It's must be the lesser known sloth kraken. They are very I'll tempered though.

ok, I'll buy the rum and wait then.

(11-17-2020 02:01 PM)DtownBronco Wrote:  

Ah okay, what's a Zoom call?

(11-17-2020 02:05 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(11-17-2020 02:01 PM)DtownBronco Wrote:  

Ah okay, what's a Zoom call?

Ask Jeffrey Toobin.

Ohhhhhh..... Krakens.


I thought she meant she was releasing all the Karens ... Because those B*tches are everywhere.

(11-17-2020 02:05 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(11-17-2020 02:01 PM)DtownBronco Wrote:  

Ah okay, what's a Zoom call?

Its like a group Skype call.

And if you don't know what Skype is-its a video call on a computer.

Teams is basically the same thing.

I think GoToMeeting is still around too.

****. Show.

Oh I love sources...

Yeah, there's a tipoff here. If their reporting is rock solid, go with.......

Quote:multiple sources tell ABC News

That always tells us that it is straight up fact!!

This is kind of like that "high level Trump official" that made allegations about what is going on in the WH. Turned out he is a mid level staffer in an agency far removed from and having no access to the WH.

Although Tom is oblivious to it, the MSM is going all out to try and destroy what they couldn't for the last four years. If they are so sure that Biden won why continue that? Because they know he didn't win a legitimate election, that's why.

(11-17-2020 03:25 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Oh I love sources...

Wait... There are multiple. Therefore totally credible.

Right, it's so far fetched that rudy and trump might get heated in a discussions...and when you throw in that motormouth Jenna Ellis....

Think guys...it's not too hard to see it. They have to know their options are pretty much exhausted at this point. Hell, they have rudy representing them in court where he has not been since 1992 according to reports. Hell, he wasn't even an admitted attorney is that circuit before today! They're clearly desperate.

Anybody know why the Left is always quoting "anonymous" sources, "anonymous" whistle blowers, and "unnamed" sources? It's quite tiring and pretty unbelievable. Still, there surely are some (LOL - we know who) that always take the hook and get reeled in by it.

(11-17-2020 03:43 PM)DtownBronco Wrote:  

(11-17-2020 03:25 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  Oh I love sources...

Wait... There are multiple. Therefore totally credible.

They furnished names, right? Like Trump did in that Atlantic article that said that Trump called veterans losers and that other thing. After all the people that refuted that story they still ran with it. These people would have been shot in a Marxist regime, maybe that's what they want, afterall, they were/are pulling for the Socialists.

(11-16-2020 10:30 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(11-16-2020 10:18 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(11-16-2020 02:58 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-16-2020 02:54 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Looking at the election results, if only a small percentage in some cases a fraction of a percentage of votes are fraudulent then Trump wins in close battleground states. Below shows how little fraud is needed for Biden wins in these states based on total COUNTED votes.

AZ 0.3%
GA 0.28%
WI 0.6%
PA 1.0%

So do Trump lawyers have to prove that much fraud occurred in each of these states, or just enough fraud from a sampling of ballots to show those numbers are likely based on the sampling?

I suspect there is enough fraud to affect outcome---however, the chances of ever proving it---especially proving it in just 2 weeks---seems virtually impossible. As Ive said before, in many states---there literally is no longer any way to connect a fraudulent ballot directly to a corresponding Trump or Biden vote. In other words, you can still prove John Q Smiths vote is fraudulent from the evidence on the outer sleeve of the ballot---what you cant tell anymore is who he voted for because the ballot has now been separated from the sleeve and no longer has anything connecting it to that fraudulent outer sleeve (its now an anonymous ballot).

I dont think a court will void the election--even if wide spread fraud was found on mail in ballots. The best I could see them doing is saying there was widespread fraud and that it was wide spread enough to effect the outcome. By doing that, they make a finding of fact--but offer no remedy--thus dumping the issue back into the lap of the various state legislatures (who, unlike judges, are elected representatives of the people).

I doubt you even see a court find fact in anything other than very tiny amounts in certain places. Even if there was proof that fraud existed, no judge worth their salt would say anything unless they saw enough of it that something had to be done.

Courts like to stay out of elections for obvious reasons

I'm not naïve enough to believe there's no fraud present in an election, but I don't believe for a second they could find enough proof of it to justify a judge overturning elections results in a state.

In fact, GOP winning at the local and congressional level in some of these races makes me think there's less voter fraud present than normal. It shows that voters don't necessarily agree with the far right or far left side of politics.

While not a state elections...judges do get involved. If I had to say one way or another if that will happen in the 2020 election. I would say no. But I wouldnt be shocked if enough fraud was found to get the courts involved

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/20/politics/...index.html

Judge invalidates Paterson, NJ, city council election after allegations of mail-in voter fraud


As to the part in bold mail in ballots. If you watched the dump of ballots where the President lost his lead of 100s thousand in a small time frame if I recall correctly it was from mail in ballots. During that same time you did not see other elections having the jump in numbers as the election for President. What I took from that a lot of mail in ballots only voted for President.

Here's a federal judge overturning CA referendum...

Federal Judge Overturns California's Same-Sex Marriage Ban

Californians voted TWICE to protect marriage with an amendment to the state constitution and judges overturned it both times.

I was just asking my wife about the Arizona senate race and if Kelly won or lost. She said Kelly won but I wonder if they're counting ballots would they count the senate race too? Is there still a chance for the Republican?

McSally is down about 80,000 votes. Trump is down less than 11,000.

The despair is real: https://fortune.com/2020/11/13/trump-not...oundtable/

This baffles me.. See I thought that CEOs love Trump and hated Biden, cause Biden will be for the little man..

But wait.. Repealing the Trump tax cuts hurts the middle class and gives advantages to the CEOs...

Wow.. Who'd thunk it.