Quote:A new post-election poll from the Media Research Center, conducted by McLaughlin & Associates, shows 36 percent of Biden voters were NOT aware of the evidence linking Joe Biden to corrupt financial dealings with China through his son Hunter. Thirteen percent of these voters (or 4.6% of Biden’s total vote) say that had they known these facts, they would not have voted for the former Vice President.

Such a shift away from Biden would have meant President Trump would have won the election with 289 electoral votes. (Details below.)

MRC President Brent Bozell reacts:

“It is an indisputable fact that the media stole the election. The American electorate was intentionally kept in the dark. During the height of the scandal surrounding Hunter Biden’s foreign dealings, the media and the big tech companies did everything in their power to cover it up. Twitter and Facebook limited sharing of the New York Post’s reports, and the liberal media omitted it from their coverage or dismissed it as Russian disinformation.

“Now we know the impact of that cover-up. 4.6% of Biden voters say they would not have voted for him had they been aware of evidence of this scandal. This story would have potentially changed the outcome of this election. The media and Silicon Valley were fully aware of this, so they actively tried to prevent it from reaching the American public. The American people deserved to know the truth; now it’s too late.”

The nationwide survey of 1,000 actual voters (including early voters) was conducted November 2-3. (PDF) Voters were asked about the bombshell reporting from the New York Post: “At the time you cast your vote for President, were you aware that evidence exists in emails, texts, eyewitness testimony and banking transactions that the FBI has been investigating since last year directly linking Joe Biden to a corrupt financial arrangement between a Chinese company with connections to the Chinese communist party and Hunter Biden’s business, which may have personally benefitted Joe Biden financially?”

While 73% of respondents said they had heard about these allegations, 27% had not — including 36% of Biden voters. Those Biden voters were then asked: “If you had been aware of this actual evidence in emails, texts, testimony and banking transactions being investigated by the FBI, would you have...” The voters were then given several options: still voted for Joe Biden (86.9%), voted for a third party candidate (5.6%), not voted for any presidential candidate (4.7%), not voted at all (1.7%) or switched their vote to Donald Trump (1.1%).

The net effect: 13.1% of these voters (4.6% of Biden’s overall vote) say they would not have voted for Biden if they had been properly informed. Applying this to the most closely-contested states, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin would today all be in the Trump column, giving the President 289 electoral college votes and a second term. (This also assumes Alaska, where the current margins are not close, is also called for the President).

Link

(11-09-2020 12:50 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Quote:A new post-election poll from the Media Research Center, conducted by McLaughlin & Associates, shows 36 percent of Biden voters were NOT aware of the evidence linking Joe Biden to corrupt financial dealings with China through his son Hunter. Thirteen percent of these voters (or 4.6% of Biden’s total vote) say that had they known these facts, they would not have voted for the former Vice President.

Such a shift away from Biden would have meant President Trump would have won the election with 289 electoral votes. (Details below.)

MRC President Brent Bozell reacts:

“It is an indisputable fact that the media stole the election. The American electorate was intentionally kept in the dark. During the height of the scandal surrounding Hunter Biden’s foreign dealings, the media and the big tech companies did everything in their power to cover it up. Twitter and Facebook limited sharing of the New York Post’s reports, and the liberal media omitted it from their coverage or dismissed it as Russian disinformation.

“Now we know the impact of that cover-up. 4.6% of Biden voters say they would not have voted for him had they been aware of evidence of this scandal. This story would have potentially changed the outcome of this election. The media and Silicon Valley were fully aware of this, so they actively tried to prevent it from reaching the American public. The American people deserved to know the truth; now it’s too late.”

The nationwide survey of 1,000 actual voters (including early voters) was conducted November 2-3. (PDF) Voters were asked about the bombshell reporting from the New York Post: “At the time you cast your vote for President, were you aware that evidence exists in emails, texts, eyewitness testimony and banking transactions that the FBI has been investigating since last year directly linking Joe Biden to a corrupt financial arrangement between a Chinese company with connections to the Chinese communist party and Hunter Biden’s business, which may have personally benefitted Joe Biden financially?”

While 73% of respondents said they had heard about these allegations, 27% had not — including 36% of Biden voters. Those Biden voters were then asked: “If you had been aware of this actual evidence in emails, texts, testimony and banking transactions being investigated by the FBI, would you have...” The voters were then given several options: still voted for Joe Biden (86.9%), voted for a third party candidate (5.6%), not voted for any presidential candidate (4.7%), not voted at all (1.7%) or switched their vote to Donald Trump (1.1%).

The net effect: 13.1% of these voters (4.6% of Biden’s overall vote) say they would not have voted for Biden if they had been properly informed. Applying this to the most closely-contested states, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin would today all be in the Trump column, giving the President 289 electoral college votes and a second term. (This also assumes Alaska, where the current margins are not close, is also called for the President).

Link

So it seems like the MSM manipulated the election.

Now they can call themselves Russia. But unlike the Russia fiasco, the MSM actually would be guilty.

Wait, now you trust polls?

(11-09-2020 12:50 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Quote:A new post-election poll from the Media Research Center, conducted by McLaughlin & Associates, shows 36 percent of Biden voters were NOT aware of the evidence linking Joe Biden to corrupt financial dealings with China through his son Hunter. Thirteen percent of these voters (or 4.6% of Biden’s total vote) say that had they known these facts, they would not have voted for the former Vice President.

Such a shift away from Biden would have meant President Trump would have won the election with 289 electoral votes. (Details below.)

MRC President Brent Bozell reacts:

“It is an indisputable fact that the media stole the election. The American electorate was intentionally kept in the dark. During the height of the scandal surrounding Hunter Biden’s foreign dealings, the media and the big tech companies did everything in their power to cover it up. Twitter and Facebook limited sharing of the New York Post’s reports, and the liberal media omitted it from their coverage or dismissed it as Russian disinformation.

“Now we know the impact of that cover-up. 4.6% of Biden voters say they would not have voted for him had they been aware of evidence of this scandal. This story would have potentially changed the outcome of this election. The media and Silicon Valley were fully aware of this, so they actively tried to prevent it from reaching the American public. The American people deserved to know the truth; now it’s too late.”

The nationwide survey of 1,000 actual voters (including early voters) was conducted November 2-3. (PDF) Voters were asked about the bombshell reporting from the New York Post: “At the time you cast your vote for President, were you aware that evidence exists in emails, texts, eyewitness testimony and banking transactions that the FBI has been investigating since last year directly linking Joe Biden to a corrupt financial arrangement between a Chinese company with connections to the Chinese communist party and Hunter Biden’s business, which may have personally benefitted Joe Biden financially?”

While 73% of respondents said they had heard about these allegations, 27% had not — including 36% of Biden voters. Those Biden voters were then asked: “If you had been aware of this actual evidence in emails, texts, testimony and banking transactions being investigated by the FBI, would you have...” The voters were then given several options: still voted for Joe Biden (86.9%), voted for a third party candidate (5.6%), not voted for any presidential candidate (4.7%), not voted at all (1.7%) or switched their vote to Donald Trump (1.1%).

The net effect: 13.1% of these voters (4.6% of Biden’s overall vote) say they would not have voted for Biden if they had been properly informed. Applying this to the most closely-contested states, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin would today all be in the Trump column, giving the President 289 electoral college votes and a second term. (This also assumes Alaska, where the current margins are not close, is also called for the President).

Link

That effectively means the media officially interfered with the election.

(11-09-2020 02:26 PM)Morkai Wrote:  Wait, now you trust polls?

And you don't?

If only everyone voted differently than we would have won!

If this is even remotely true, then the Trump administration committed political malfeasance by not getting this information out sooner. Waiting until after voting had already begun was stupid. Democrats knew what was coming down, and that's why they put so much emphasis on getting people to vote early.

This is what I've said before, democrats put everything on winning elections. Republicans don't. Until that changes, get used to getting screwed.

I rank the Hunter story pretty low on the list of things that affected my vote for Trump.

I just don't see why the MSM goes no-holds-barred against Trump's family but 'you're not voting for Hunter so it doesn't matter' when it comes to their side

(11-09-2020 03:09 PM)Morkai Wrote:  If only everyone voted differently than we would have won!

If only we had the election committee in every state we would have only had to cheat a little....

Republicans have more state Congresses so crank up the cheating guys. Make them pay. If you ain’t cheating you ain’t trying! We should win every election from this point on because we all know whatever some democrat can do with limited intellect republicans can do so much better.

(11-09-2020 04:45 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I rank the Hunter story pretty low on the list of things that affected my vote for Trump.

I just don't see why the MSM goes no-holds-barred against Trump's family but 'you're not voting for Hunter so it doesn't matter' when it comes to their side

You don't? Really?

(11-09-2020 04:45 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I rank the Hunter story pretty low on the list of things that affected my vote for Trump.
I just don't see why the MSM goes no-holds-barred against Trump's family but 'you're not voting for Hunter so it doesn't matter' when it comes to their side

Umm, how about so that the Hunter story would be pretty low on the list. You just answered your own question.

I just had a thought.

What's really going to be interesting is that the left doesn't really want Biden, he was just the only one they could put into the Trojan horse role and get themselves elected.

So what happens when the time comes that they want Biden to step aside for Harris and he says (or Jill tells him to say) no? Do the MSM suddenly discover all of Hunter's indiscretions and illegalities? Do they suddenly conduct real investigations of Ukraine and Burisma and China? How do they react?

(11-09-2020 05:01 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I just had a thought.

What's really going to be interesting is that the left doesn't really want Biden, he was just the only one they could put into the Trojan horse role and get themselves elected.

So what happens when the time comes that they want Biden to step aside for Harris and he says (or Jill tells him to say) no? Do the MSM suddenly discover all of Hunter's indiscretions and illegalities? Do they suddenly conduct real investigations of Ukraine and Burisma and China? How do they react?

Much less messy for Sloe to die of complications of a COVID vaccination. These people are going full USSR retard you know....

(11-09-2020 05:01 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I just had a thought.

What's really going to be interesting is that the left doesn't really want Biden, he was just the only one they could put into the Trojan horse role and get themselves elected.

So what happens when the time comes that they want Biden to step aside for Harris and he says (or Jill tells him to say) no? Do the MSM suddenly discover all of Hunter's indiscretions and illegalities? Do they suddenly conduct real investigations of Ukraine and Burisma and China? How do they react?

Good observation. I had wondered about that myself. That would be illuminating if it happened. Wonder how much censorship the media and social media would have if that scenario would play out.

(11-09-2020 04:45 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I rank the Hunter story pretty low on the list of things that affected my vote for Trump.

I just don't see why the MSM goes no-holds-barred against Trump's family but 'you're not voting for Hunter so it doesn't matter' when it comes to their side

It's because you are not a dem. Are you?

(11-09-2020 03:09 PM)Morkai Wrote:  If only everyone voted differently than we would have won!

Or maybe if everyone had only voted legally.

(11-09-2020 04:45 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I rank the Hunter story pretty low on the list of things that affected my vote for Trump.

I just don't see why the MSM goes no-holds-barred against Trump's family but 'you're not voting for Hunter so it doesn't matter' when it comes to their side

His family was more active in the admistration than hunter will be ya know because there will actually be someone qualified instead.

(11-09-2020 05:01 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I just had a thought.

What's really going to be interesting is that the left doesn't really want Biden, he was just the only one they could put into the Trojan horse role and get themselves elected.

So what happens when the time comes that they want Biden to step aside for Harris and he says (or Jill tells him to say) no? Do the MSM suddenly discover all of Hunter's indiscretions and illegalities? Do they suddenly conduct real investigations of Ukraine and Burisma and China? How do they react?

THAT...would be so much fun to watch. I might even watch the Chinese News Network for that. I hope it happens, the Bite'ems don't deserve any consideration...at all.

(11-09-2020 05:24 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 04:45 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  I rank the Hunter story pretty low on the list of things that affected my vote for Trump.

I just don't see why the MSM goes no-holds-barred against Trump's family but 'you're not voting for Hunter so it doesn't matter' when it comes to their side

His family was more active in the admistration than hunter will be ya know because there will actually be someone qualified instead.

Hunter in the administration? You bumbaz. They never put the bagboy in the administration even if he is more experienced at extortion. It’s good enough to just know the “Big Man”.

That’s awesome news! Corruption matters again! I predict that the deficit is going to matter again too starting in mid-January.