(12-23-2020 02:21 AM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I just don’t get the love affair with Boise. Not a great market, terrible academics, a diminished brand, and a questionable future. They wouldn’t finish in the top five any year. They bring nothing except sucking up more money. They wouldn’t be able to compete in this big boy conference, this is not the mountain west. I just don’t see any value to adding them. Army and BYU on the other hand is a different story. I say hold out for them.

Hahahahahaha - thanks man, that was some funny drivel.

(12-23-2020 02:21 AM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I just don’t get the love affair with Boise. Not a great market, terrible academics, a diminished brand, and a questionable future. They wouldn’t finish in the top five any year. They bring nothing except sucking up more money. They wouldn’t be able to compete in this big boy conference, this is not the mountain west. I just don’t see any value to adding them. Army and BYU on the other hand is a different story. I say hold out for them.

Lmao that sounds exactly like Tulane

(12-23-2020 02:21 AM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I just don’t get the love affair with Boise. Not a great market, terrible academics, a diminished brand, and a questionable future. They wouldn’t finish in the top five any year. They bring nothing except sucking up more money. They wouldn’t be able to compete in this big boy conference, this is not the mountain west. I just don’t see any value to adding them. Army and BYU on the other hand is a different story. I say hold out for them.

Perception is reality. Not to be a jerk, Boise is a much bigger brand name than let's say Tulane. Adding Boise makes it seem like more of a power conference, which is the goal. Plus ESPN seems to love them. Also, I don't believe they would be sucking up any money, but they may add money.

(12-23-2020 06:40 AM)Vertigo Wrote:  

(12-23-2020 02:21 AM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I just don’t get the love affair with Boise. Not a great market, terrible academics, a diminished brand, and a questionable future. They wouldn’t finish in the top five any year. They bring nothing except sucking up more money. They wouldn’t be able to compete in this big boy conference, this is not the mountain west. I just don’t see any value to adding them. Army and BYU on the other hand is a different story. I say hold out for them.

Lmao that sounds exactly like Tulane

Except it doesn’t.

New Orleans is New Orleans
One of the top schools in the country
Tulane never really had a brand
If anything, their future seems bright

Carry on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(12-23-2020 07:11 AM)tnzazz Wrote:  

(12-23-2020 06:40 AM)Vertigo Wrote:  

(12-23-2020 02:21 AM)Thewavefan Wrote:  I just don’t get the love affair with Boise. Not a great market, terrible academics, a diminished brand, and a questionable future. They wouldn’t finish in the top five any year. They bring nothing except sucking up more money. They wouldn’t be able to compete in this big boy conference, this is not the mountain west. I just don’t see any value to adding them. Army and BYU on the other hand is a different story. I say hold out for them.

Lmao that sounds exactly like Tulane

Except it doesn’t.

New Orleans is New Orleans
One of the top schools in the country
Tulane never really had a brand
If anything, their future seems bright

Carry on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That was his first and only post ever.
Vertigo is a Scott damn troll.