Isnt his whole campaign based on being different than Trump? At least Trump requires several nasty question to get nasty. Joe goes personal after one crummy question. Surprised the volatile, unstable, likely senile hair smeller didnt challenge the reporter to a fist fight.
(This post was last modified: 10-17-2020 12:17 PM by Attackcoog.)
Aaaaaand it appears the Twitter has now blocked this as well.
Any other places to find this?
On what basis would this be blocked. Its factual. it happend. Its not hacked. Furthermore, voluntarily surrendered emails from Hunters partner are supporting the same narrative.
This blocking crap is pretty out of control. Today, a Project Veritas was video showing voter fraud on mail in ballots was blocked for "containing false information" based on a fact check from USA-Today. That was actually a lie. The USA Today fact check says the video Project Veritas provided of an individual committing fraud doesnt constitute proof because it "might" could have been shot at a different time (though the video time stamp is clearly visible). The "possibility" that something might not be timestamped properly is NOT PROOF that the Project Veritas video is false. Its is simply conjecture. Using that standard, anything we see "might" on TV or the internet "might" be false as it could be deep faked or shot long ago (old tv video has no on air time stamp visible to the viewer). Frankly, Ive noticed that an extremely large percentage of "fact checking" is not "factual" at all---and is sometimes flat out misleading. The so called "fact checks" are often simply partisan opinions requiring word parsing, wildly unique interpretations, slanted facts, and leaps of logic to arrive at the stated "false or misleading" conclusion. Often, its considered "false or misleading" if it only explains the republican position without giving equal time to the DNC counter-position talking points----something that is never required of Left leaning material on the same platform.
Project Veritas has responded with an ultimatum. Remove the inaccurate "false material" label from the video or get sued.
(This post was last modified: 10-17-2020 01:41 PM by Attackcoog.)
Question. Does this make China less aggressive? Or the opposite?
My fear is that they will move on Hong Kong and Taiwan both in very short order. Their inroad to the White House is gone. They might move now before the U.S. can get itself in order.
Deep state now investigating this as a case of election interference. Really? With enough evidence that this is real they are trying to tell us to move along, nothing to see. Yeah right...
The fact that a CBS reporter, a CBS reporter even asked him that question is proof that someone is actually believing that this Piece of Schiff is guilty of Pay for Play...and other crimes. He has had two heart attacks I see another one coming soon. Then what? Would the Demons select another person to run AS president or elevate the Slut to the no. one position?
I tell you, no soap opera could write the story line about this real life soap. A soap opera with ramifications, you know, elections have consequences.
(10-17-2020 02:19 PM)Claw Wrote: Question. Does this make China less aggressive? Or the opposite?
My fear is that they will move on Hong Kong and Taiwan both in very short order. Their inroad to the White House is gone. They might move now before the U.S. can get itself in order.
My thinking is that it's all hot air. China cannot get into any fighting war with anyone not even Hong Kong. They are already suffering from Trumps tariffs and companies leaving them. Who will protect their oil shipments from the middle east? The US isn't why should they? It would hurt them more than help going into a war.
(10-17-2020 08:34 PM)olliebaba Wrote: The fact that a CBS reporter, a CBS reporter even asked him that question is proof that someone is actually believing that this Piece of Schiff is guilty of Pay for Play...and other crimes.
I think it is something deeper than that. Even though trust in the media among non-democrats is in the toilet, they know that this story is real, even though they don't want to cover it. But they know that if they don't cover it and it all blows up, their credibility as a 'news' organization is totally shot. So, they are grudgingly giving it a little coverage, at least by asking the question.
(10-17-2020 08:34 PM)olliebaba Wrote: The fact that a CBS reporter, a CBS reporter even asked him that question is proof that someone is actually believing that this Piece of Schiff is guilty of Pay for Play...and other crimes.
I think it is something deeper than that. Even though trust in the media among non-democrats is in the toilet, they know that this story is real, even though they don't want to cover it. But they know that if they don't cover it and it all blows up, their credibility as a 'news' organization is totally shot. So, they are grudgingly giving it a little coverage, at least by asking the question.
So now, one of the Q. has to be, "where IS all that wealth?" Which Biden family member is holding it for the "Big Guy?" Has Anybody looked into the finances of the other members of the Biden Crime Family? Anybody? Bueller?
Peter Shwietzer (sp) wrote an entire book about it, including brother James, a sister and daughter of someone I think. I haven't read it but have heard excerpts when he's been interviewed, the entire family has gotten rich through Fed Gubment contracts in a whole bunch of fields none of them have any prior experience in. All trading on Sloe's last name.
(10-22-2020 04:07 PM)JMUDunk Wrote: Peter Shwietzer (sp) wrote an entire book about it, including brother James, a sister and daughter of someone I think. I haven't read it but have heard excerpts when he's been interviewed, the entire family has gotten rich through Fed Gubment contracts in a whole bunch of fields none of them have any prior experience in. All trading on Sloe's last name.