Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
Is this for real?
Author Message
BEARCATDALE Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,629
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 428
I Root For: UC
Location: passed out somewhere
Post: #1
Is this for real?




Interview with Benghazi whistleblower Nick Noe shares his story and information that will be released through Media outlets soon. Interesting stuff begins about 9 minutes in.

Connected to it is this.

10-14-2020 09:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 82,008
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3446
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #2
RE: Is this for real?
All this stuff is interesting, but way too late. It might be just enough, in just enough time, to get Trump over the hump and keep republican control the senate.

But this--and anything else they have--could and should have been exposed in time for the midterms. Remember, the democrats took control of the house running on little else besides impeach, impeach, impeach. That would be a hard message to sustain if all this kind of stuff had come out back then. And if republicans had retained control of the house in 2018, we would be in a vastly different place politically from where we are today.
10-14-2020 11:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,634
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5051
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Is this for real?
(10-14-2020 11:13 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  All this stuff is interesting, but way too late. It might be just enough, in just enough time, to get Trump over the hump and keep republican control the senate.

But this--and anything else they have--could and should have been exposed in time for the midterms. Remember, the democrats took control of the house running on little else besides impeach, impeach, impeach. That would be a hard message to sustain if all this kind of stuff had come out back then. And if republicans had retained control of the house in 2018, we would be in a vastly different place politically from where we are today.

Well they got turnout based on impeach, but they won independents with health care.
10-15-2020 09:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 82,008
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3446
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #4
RE: Is this for real?
(10-15-2020 09:27 AM)bullet Wrote:  
(10-14-2020 11:13 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  All this stuff is interesting, but way too late. It might be just enough, in just enough time, to get Trump over the hump and keep republican control the senate.
But this--and anything else they have--could and should have been exposed in time for the midterms. Remember, the democrats took control of the house running on little else besides impeach, impeach, impeach. That would be a hard message to sustain if all this kind of stuff had come out back then. And if republicans had retained control of the house in 2018, we would be in a vastly different place politically from where we are today.
Well they got turnout based on impeach, but they won independents with health care.

And that was incredible stupidity on republicans' part. Nothing new there. They've had Obamacare for basically a decade now. It's a terrible system but they can't come up with anything better. They can't even come up with counters to the democrat lies about it. Democrats are still saying it makes health care available to everyone, at lower costs, and it does neither.

A system that truly did make health care available to everyone at lower costs would be hard to run against. But Obamacare is not that system, not even remotely close, and it's well past time for republicans to give democrats carte blanche to make such blatantly false claims. I said it then, and have repeated it consistently ever since. When republicans took over the house after the 2010 elections, their first orders of business should have been to pass Bismarck health care to replace Obamacare and to pass Bowles-Simpson, or Domenici-Rivlin, or some combination of "best practices" from both, to claim the high ground on two key issues and give Harry Reid and Obama two hot potatoes to handle.
(This post was last modified: 10-15-2020 10:48 PM by Owl 69/70/75.)
10-15-2020 11:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.