The silence from the Biden family is deafening. Joe has made a definitive statement that is likely true but misleading - he never received any money from a foreign country. Hunter received money from foreign companies and individuals. Joe has also made a definitive statement that seems to be proven a lie through Joe's own contradictions, pictures, emails, and now a statement by the Bobinowski guy - He never discussed any of Hunter's foreign business deals. Now all that needs to be asked/proven are three questions:

1. Is Joe Biden "the big guy"?
2. Has Hunter Biden or any other Biden family member 'given' money to Joe over the years per Hunter's text message?
3. Did you lie when you said you never discussed Hunter's foreign business deals with him?

There is currently more evidence that 1, Joe is "the big guy", 2, Biden family members did give money to Joe Biden, and 3, Joe Biden did lie when he said he never discussed Hunter's foreign business deals than there was of nearly anything to do with the Steele dossier.

NY Post calls it blackmail by twitter

https://nypost.com/2020/10/28/twitter-is...c-for-you/

(10-28-2020 02:05 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:51 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:48 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 12:28 PM)banker Wrote:  To be fair, Joe was a lot less dementia(ish) in 2017. Pretty apparent based on video.

RWT, just to be clear, you don’t believe anything presented against Biden? Not the emails, texts, recordings or documents, not only from Hunter’s laptop, but also from his partner in jail and this Bobuliski guy?

I concede that the laptop was likely Hunter's and that the emails are probably mostly genuine as well as the photos and audio recordings and video's and such. But we're lacking way too much context and a coherent timeline of events to know if any crimes were actually committed or whether Joe knew anything. Not to mention, the story of how this computer came into the possession of Rudy still flies in the face of common sense.

My working THEORY is that the data on the laptop was collected via the Burisma hack and a likely hack of either this computer or another one and that all the data was planted on one laptop and was planted in the repair shop. Lev Parnas pretty much said as much in an interview with him I read the other day.

What I find so funny in all of this is that Joe is supposedly demented and Hunter is a bumbling drug addict, yet they somehow managed to pull off the huge mafia style multimillion dollar money making operation.

Wait wait wait. So...

You're telling me that Joe, who is lobbying to be the most powerful man in the world as President of the United States wouldn't have at least a basic, functional knowledge of what his son has been up to WHILE he was Vice President and harboring hopes of eventually being President? That's pretty unrealistic. Considering Hunter's propensity to do some nefarious things in life, it could easily be argued that someone with aspirations like Joe would not just let his son travel the world and make business deals all willy-nilly. That would be reckless, and potentially devastating to a significant political power play. So, in reality... he probably had a tighter leash on Hunter than any of his other kids. Thus... it's not a logical leap to assume/believe that Joe himself, the Biden campaign, and significant democrat power players all indeed have very strong knowledge of all of Hunter's dealings over the past couple decades -- to include his drug problems.

I'm still waiting for any proof of any crime or criminal enterprise making the Biden family millions of dollars as alleged....

Than you don't understand what crimes are.

I guess I missed the indictment. Can you link it for me?

(10-28-2020 02:04 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 12:28 PM)banker Wrote:  To be fair, Joe was a lot less dementia(ish) in 2017. Pretty apparent based on video.

RWT, just to be clear, you don’t believe anything presented against Biden? Not the emails, texts, recordings or documents, not only from Hunter’s laptop, but also from his partner in jail and this Bobuliski guy?

I concede that the laptop was likely Hunter's and that the emails are probably mostly genuine as well as the photos and audio recordings and video's and such. But we're lacking way too much context and a coherent timeline of events to know if any crimes were actually committed or whether Joe knew anything. Not to mention, the story of how this computer came into the possession of Rudy still flies in the face of common sense.

My working THEORY is that the data on the laptop was collected via the Burisma hack and a likely hack of either this computer or another one and that all the data was planted on one laptop and was planted in the repair shop. Lev Parnas pretty much said as much in an interview with him I read the other day.

What I find so funny in all of this is that Joe is supposedly demented and Hunter is a bumbling drug addict, yet they somehow managed to pull off the huge mafia style multimillion dollar money making operation.

The FBI has the laptop and the guy that gave it to them made copies of the hard drive, and he gave a copy to Rudy. Demented Joe and Coke Head had competent help on these matters.

So what? It's still plausible someone other than Hunter dropped off the computer to the blind guy.

Should be pretty easy to determine if that is his signature or not.

"Hunter Biden has not confirmed or denied that he dropped a laptop off at a Delaware computer repair shop in April 2019.

Hunter Biden’s lawyer, George Mesires, did not respond to numerous inquiries from the Daily Caller News Foundation asking if a quote containing Hunter Biden’s signature authorizing the repair shop to pull data from the laptop is a forgery.

If Hunter Biden was not the individual who dropped off the laptop at the repair shop in April 2019, or the signed quote produced by the Post is a forgery, it would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the emails pulled from the computer allegedly detailing his business dealings in Ukraine and China."

Perhaps. I've seen a couple so called experts say it's a forgery...but who knows. But no, even if the signature is a forgery, the emails could still be real. Especially in my working theory that the stuff on a planted laptop came from the hack of Burisma.

(10-29-2020 06:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 02:04 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-28-2020 01:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I concede that the laptop was likely Hunter's and that the emails are probably mostly genuine as well as the photos and audio recordings and video's and such. But we're lacking way too much context and a coherent timeline of events to know if any crimes were actually committed or whether Joe knew anything. Not to mention, the story of how this computer came into the possession of Rudy still flies in the face of common sense.

My working THEORY is that the data on the laptop was collected via the Burisma hack and a likely hack of either this computer or another one and that all the data was planted on one laptop and was planted in the repair shop. Lev Parnas pretty much said as much in an interview with him I read the other day.

What I find so funny in all of this is that Joe is supposedly demented and Hunter is a bumbling drug addict, yet they somehow managed to pull off the huge mafia style multimillion dollar money making operation.

The FBI has the laptop and the guy that gave it to them made copies of the hard drive, and he gave a copy to Rudy. Demented Joe and Coke Head had competent help on these matters.

So what? It's still plausible someone other than Hunter dropped off the computer to the blind guy.

Should be pretty easy to determine if that is his signature or not.

"Hunter Biden has not confirmed or denied that he dropped a laptop off at a Delaware computer repair shop in April 2019.

Hunter Biden’s lawyer, George Mesires, did not respond to numerous inquiries from the Daily Caller News Foundation asking if a quote containing Hunter Biden’s signature authorizing the repair shop to pull data from the laptop is a forgery.

If Hunter Biden was not the individual who dropped off the laptop at the repair shop in April 2019, or the signed quote produced by the Post is a forgery, it would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the emails pulled from the computer allegedly detailing his business dealings in Ukraine and China."

Perhaps. I've seen a couple so called experts say it's a forgery...but who knows. But no, even if the signature is a forgery, the emails could still be real. Especially in the DNC/Adam Schiff theory that the stuff on a planted laptop came from the hack of Burisma.

FIFY

The denials from the Biden’s have been quite vociferous!

Or at least I’m sure they would be had there been any.

Seems their strategy is to let the MSM do all the denying for them.

(10-29-2020 07:24 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  The denials from the Biden’s have been quite vociferous!

Or at least I’m sure they would be had there been any.

Seems their strategy is to let the MSM do all the denying for them.

It's the right play. Let the other side show their work and make their case. Don't give them any air play at all by debunking it.

So far, they (team trump) have failed.