Jason Whitlock writes about BLM scrubbing its website of the "What We Believe" section.

Quote:Welcome to the latest edition of Black Lives Matter 101, Volume 8, the online class dedicated to explaining to athletes the real agenda and impact of the BLM movement.

Our class and the work of others across the internet are having a real impact.

Black Lives Matter, aka, Bigots Love Marxism, scrubbed its “what we believe” page from the organization’s website. BLM is executing a coverup. As we saw with the Nixon presidency, the coverup reveals the severity of the crime.

BLM’s “what we believe” page originally exposed the movement’s heavy Marxist influence. The page called for the disruption of the nuclear family. Let me quote it directly.

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents and children are comfortable.”

Quote:People are finally looking beyond BLM’s catchy slogan and evaluating the actual agenda. The agenda is Karl Marx’s anti-God, pro-communism political theory. BLM scrubbed its “what we believe” page because smart people are distancing themselves from BLM.

This summer while American sports leagues were swallowing Black Lives Matter’s entire agenda and embedding their slogans onto fields and courts, the Premier Soccer League distanced itself from BLM. Read this story from early July about EPL stars and their new position on BLM. Two weeks ago, ESPN reported that Premier League clubs scrapped their BLM badges.

This is why I’ve been furious with the horrendous leadership of Roger Goodell, Adam Silver and Rob Manfred. They embraced BLM at the exact time the rest of the world was figuring out the fraudulence of the BLM movement.

BLM is backpedaling from its own founding principles because those principles are being rejected by people with a modicum of common sense.

https://www.outkick.com/blm101-we-are-wi...s-beliefs/

I wouldn't get too excited. It's a cover-up. They aren't changing what they believe, they just don't want folks to be able to confirm it via going to their website. Hopefully some folks screenshot it before it disappeared.

Another view:

Quote:Somewhere along the line, Black Lives Matter and the 1619 Project both edited their websites to remove controversially radical statements about their beliefs. This should be recognized as merely a public relations concession, not an ideological one. Both BLM and 1619 will continue to be propelled by fringe leftists and their hapless corporate sponsors.

In BLM’s case, the editing had to be fairly recent. Critics have rightfully spent the summer pointing to a section of the group’s website that calls for the disruption of the nuclear family.

Quote:The group’s philosophy on family structure is not without consequence. Just last week, Tucker Carlson reported that a Buffalo school district, relying on lesson plans crafted by a council of the city’s public school system, approvingly taught fourth and fifth graders to understand “the disruption of Western nuclear family dynamics and a return to the ‘collective village’ that takes care of each other” as a “guiding principle” of BLM.

The New York Times’ 1619 Project, at its inception, was openly an effort to “reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding.” That was its central assertion. It is now gone from the project’s website.

The project’s Pulitzer-winning architect Nikole Hannah-Jones continues to beclown herself, this time by claiming the project “does not argue that 1776 was not the founding of the country” when a graphic that literally crossed out “July 4, 1776” and replaced it with “August 20, 1619” was the banner photo on her Twitter profile when the essay collection launched and the website explicitly said it was an effort to “reframe the country’s history” to “[understand] 1619 as our true founding.” It’s a sad joke made even sadder by the fact that the project has been integrated into curriculum in the school districts of three major cities.

Quote:So what? Why does it matter that BLM is run by radicals who peddle fringe leftism? Why does it matter that 1619 is shoddy journalism with a radical agenda? Will the leftists behind either project actually be able to advance their ideological agendas in meaningful ways?

The corporatists bankrolling BLM likely don’t believe the group will do anything to substantively advance anti-capitalism. If they marinate in corporate media coverage, they probably don’t even know about the group’s radical roots. If they do they might not believe it.

Both groups seem to have determined their jabs at the nuclear family and 1776 are best kept off their websites. This makes it easier for corporatists and journalists to continue legitimizing them with money and positive coverage. It does not, however, mean their ideological priorities are any different.

Those ideological priorities are absolutely shifting our culture further leftward. The evidence isn’t as immediately visible as successful legislation or campaigns. (Although those exist and soon there will be enough of them to seriously affect our free enterprise system.)

https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/22/blm...0I.twitter

Who said this. Who posted this here?

I said it. Called it. They must read this board.

"The clowns running corporate America, including Goodell, Silver and Manfred, should be held accountable for lacking the substance to stand against this destructive movement. They supported the new KKK, a race-based domestic terrorist movement dependent on mob rule. They legitimized and justified a summer of chaos. "

Confirmed they deleted it.

This was the funniest part,

We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work ‘double shifts’ so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work,” the organization wrote. “We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”

How long before Google scrubs videos like this from their YouTube platform. Honestly I’m surprised they haven’t already. They won’t want you hearing the truth straight from the founder of Black Lives Matter.





I theorize The DNC shared polling with BLM that confirmed people with the ability to think for themselves were believing exactly what BLM was telling everyone.