(11-22-2020 11:16 PM)HoopsJunky Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 10:55 PM)CoastalJuan Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 07:36 PM)HoopsJunky Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 05:21 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 02:50 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  Putting Tulsa behind two teams that we beat. Seems legit to me.

Hoop Junkies don’t know much about football.

Neural field you are betting Tulsa right now vs UCF?

Tulsa hasn’t looked good in while
ECU game was a gift. Miracle to beat Tulane

Tulsa was a better team when they played UCF than they are now

I will be rooting for Tulsa to beat Houston but i don’t think they will

I may look like an idiot but I think Cincy has there way with Tulsa

This is a little bit ridiculous. Forget the “neural” field. They played at UCF’s field and Tulsa won. No need to speculate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They played 45 days ago

Tulsa has regressed and UCF has played better since

I am not sure anybody can watch Tulsa right now and think they are playing well

In that 45 days UCF has lost to Memphis and Cincinnati.

Tulsa has lost to zero teams, while beating a ranked SMU, who beat a team UCF lost to in that 45 days.

(11-23-2020 02:19 AM)Foreverandever Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 11:16 PM)HoopsJunky Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 10:55 PM)CoastalJuan Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 07:36 PM)HoopsJunky Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 05:21 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Hoop Junkies don’t know much about football.

Neural field you are betting Tulsa right now vs UCF?

Tulsa hasn’t looked good in while
ECU game was a gift. Miracle to beat Tulane

Tulsa was a better team when they played UCF than they are now

I will be rooting for Tulsa to beat Houston but i don’t think they will

I may look like an idiot but I think Cincy has there way with Tulsa

This is a little bit ridiculous. Forget the “neural” field. They played at UCF’s field and Tulsa won. No need to speculate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They played 45 days ago

Tulsa has regressed and UCF has played better since

I am not sure anybody can watch Tulsa right now and think they are playing well

In that 45 days UCF has lost to Memphis and Cincinnati.

Tulsa has lost to zero teams, while beating a ranked SMU, who beat a team UCF lost to in that 45 days.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(11-22-2020 11:23 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 11:16 PM)HoopsJunky Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 10:55 PM)CoastalJuan Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 07:36 PM)HoopsJunky Wrote:  

(11-22-2020 05:21 PM)Mr Hyde Wrote:  Hoop Junkies don’t know much about football.

Neural field you are betting Tulsa right now vs UCF?

Tulsa hasn’t looked good in while
ECU game was a gift. Miracle to beat Tulane

Tulsa was a better team when they played UCF than they are now

I will be rooting for Tulsa to beat Houston but i don’t think they will

I may look like an idiot but I think Cincy has there way with Tulsa

This is a little bit ridiculous. Forget the “neural” field. They played at UCF’s field and Tulsa won. No need to speculate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They played 45 days ago

Tulsa has regressed and UCF has played better since

I am not sure anybody can watch Tulsa right now and think they are playing well

The 3,900 that packed the gazebo the past 2 weeks would say otherwise.

#normalhomecrowd

(11-21-2020 10:02 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  1. Cincy
2. Tulsa
3. SMU
4. Memphis
5. UCF
6. Houston
7. Navy
8. Tulane
9. ECU
10. Temple
11. USF

Flip SMU and UCF...

UCF is better than Memphis and SMU.

(11-24-2020 07:42 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(11-21-2020 10:02 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  1. Cincy
2. Tulsa
3. SMU
4. Memphis
5. UCF
6. Houston
7. Navy
8. Tulane
9. ECU
10. Temple
11. USF

Flip SMU and UCF...

UCF is better than Memphis and SMU.

Head to head and record say different

1. Cincinnati
2. Tulsa
3. UCF
4. Memphis
5. Tulane
6. Houston
7. Navy
8. ECU
9. USF
10 Temple

ESPN Bottom 10
1. SMU
2. UConn

1. Cincinnati

2. Tulsa

3. UCF
4. Memphis

5. Houston
6. SMU (I know ECU fans...but one game... I can't plummet them to the unthinking depths)
7. Tulane
8. Navy

9. ECU

10. Temple
11. USF

(11-28-2020 03:39 PM)mustangxc Wrote:  1. Cincinnati
2. Tulsa
3. UCF
4. Memphis
5. Tulane
6. Houston
7. Navy
8. ECU
9. USF
10 Temple

ESPN Bottom 10
1. SMU
2. UConn

Minor point a the bottom of your rankings: Temple beat USF, and both teams have one win.

At least Purple UCONN has to be retired for the offseason!!!

(11-28-2020 03:39 PM)mustangxc Wrote:  1. Cincinnati
2. Tulsa
3. UCF
4. Memphis
5. Tulane
6. Houston
7. Navy
8. ECU
9. USF
10 Temple

ESPN Bottom 10
1. SMU
2. UConn

I'm disappointed with SMU also, but they did beat Navy, Temple, Memphis, Tulane, and they are probably better than USF though they weren't on our schedule. No excuses for losing to a 2-6 ECU team though, especially with everything that was on the line.

(11-24-2020 07:42 PM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(11-21-2020 10:02 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  1. Cincy
2. Tulsa
3. SMU
4. Memphis
5. UCF
6. Houston
7. Navy
8. Tulane
9. ECU
10. Temple
11. USF

Flip SMU and UCF...

UCF is better than Memphis and SMU.

I agree. Still having to play Tulane and UH will not be easy.

1. Cincy (Clear King-of-the-Hill)

2. Tulsa (Only team besides Cincy that still controls it's own destiny)

3A. Memphis
3B. UCF

5. Houston
6. SMU (Missing Roberson really kills them)

7. ECU
8. Navy
9. Tulane

10. Temple
11. USF

(11-28-2020 04:50 PM)SMUstang Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 03:39 PM)mustangxc Wrote:  1. Cincinnati
2. Tulsa
3. UCF
4. Memphis
5. Tulane
6. Houston
7. Navy
8. ECU
9. USF
10 Temple

ESPN Bottom 10
1. SMU
2. UConn

I'm disappointed with SMU also, but they did beat Navy, Temple, Memphis, Tulane, and they are probably better than USF though they weren't on our schedule. No excuses for losing to a 2-6* ECU team though, especially with everything that was on the line.

By AAC Conference proclamation, officially 2-6* with an asterisk. Now 3-6*.

1. Cincy
2. Tulsa
3. Memphis
4. UCF
5. Houston
6. SMU
7. Navy
8. East Carolina
9. Tulane
10. Temple
11. South Florida

(11-29-2020 10:02 AM)mikeinoki Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 04:50 PM)SMUstang Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 03:39 PM)mustangxc Wrote:  1. Cincinnati
2. Tulsa
3. UCF
4. Memphis
5. Tulane
6. Houston
7. Navy
8. ECU
9. USF
10 Temple

ESPN Bottom 10
1. SMU
2. UConn

I'm disappointed with SMU also, but they did beat Navy, Temple, Memphis, Tulane, and they are probably better than USF though they weren't on our schedule. No excuses for losing to a 2-6* ECU team though, especially with everything that was on the line.

By AAC Conference proclamation, officially 2-6* with an asterisk. Now 3-6*.

Oh shut up ya whiner.

official aac release..

cincy has clinched its title bid

tulsa, houston and memphis are the only ones left with games to go

tulsa will lose any tie-breaker ..but only needs 1 wn in 2 games (navy vs tulsa especially key)
impossible for houston/memphis to tie at the top.. they are each other last game

if navy beats tulsa , houston beats smu, memphis beats tulane.. memphis vs houston winner likely gets bid..

(11-29-2020 02:08 PM)pesik Wrote:  official aac release..

cincy has clinched its title bid

tulsa, houston and memphis are the only ones left with games to go

tulsa will lose any tie-breaker ..but only needs 1 wn in 2 games (navy vs tulsa especially key)
impossible for houston/memphis to tie at the top.. they are each other last game

if navy beats tulsa , houston beats smu, memphis beats tulane.. memphis vs houston winner likely gets bid..

How is that true? It goes to computer rankings if it goes to tie breakers with no head to heads, and I'm not sure how that would play out.

Memphis getting in over Tulsa simply because Tulsa wasn't able to play a game that an opponent (Houston) effectively canceled on us would be unfair.

(11-29-2020 04:09 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(11-29-2020 02:08 PM)pesik Wrote:  official aac release..

cincy has clinched its title bid

tulsa, houston and memphis are the only ones left with games to go

tulsa will lose any tie-breaker ..but only needs 1 wn in 2 games (navy vs tulsa especially key)
impossible for houston/memphis to tie at the top.. they are each other last game

if navy beats tulsa , houston beats smu, memphis beats tulane.. memphis vs houston winner likely gets bid..

How is that true? It goes to computer rankings if it goes to tie breakers with no head to heads, and I'm not sure how that would play out.

again this is from the official release....memphis has some tie breaker vs tulsa that is not mentioned in the release...and houston/tulsa tie breaker will be who is ranked higher by the bcs computers, with "projections" that houston will be ranked higher if they win out and Tulsa losses out

(11-29-2020 04:09 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(11-29-2020 02:08 PM)pesik Wrote:  official aac release..

cincy has clinched its title bid

tulsa, houston and memphis are the only ones left with games to go

tulsa will lose any tie-breaker ..but only needs 1 wn in 2 games (navy vs tulsa especially key)
impossible for houston/memphis to tie at the top.. they are each other last game

if navy beats tulsa , houston beats smu, memphis beats tulane.. memphis vs houston winner likely gets bid..

How is that true? It goes to computer rankings if it goes to tie breakers with no head to heads, and I'm not sure how that would play out.

Memphis getting in over Tulsa simply because Tulsa wasn't able to play a game that an opponent (Houston) effectively canceled on us would be unfair.

I would imagine if y’all lose the next 2 and Memphis wins the next 2 you’d fall past Memphis in the computer rankings.

(11-29-2020 04:48 PM)uofmcamaro Wrote:  

(11-29-2020 04:09 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(11-29-2020 02:08 PM)pesik Wrote:  official aac release..

cincy has clinched its title bid

tulsa, houston and memphis are the only ones left with games to go

tulsa will lose any tie-breaker ..but only needs 1 wn in 2 games (navy vs tulsa especially key)
impossible for houston/memphis to tie at the top.. they are each other last game

if navy beats tulsa , houston beats smu, memphis beats tulane.. memphis vs houston winner likely gets bid..

How is that true? It goes to computer rankings if it goes to tie breakers with no head to heads, and I'm not sure how that would play out.

Memphis getting in over Tulsa simply because Tulsa wasn't able to play a game that an opponent (Houston) effectively canceled on us would be unfair.

I would imagine if y’all lose the next 2 and Memphis wins the next 2 you’d fall past Memphis in the computer rankings.

That's possible, but not automatic. I'm trying to figure out whether or not it's win% in a two team Tulsa Memphis tiebreaker. I didn't think it was but the tie breaker rules are poorly written.