Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
Author Message
bill dazzle Offline
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast
*

Posts: 10,587
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 968
I Root For: Vandy/Memphis/DePaul/UNC
Location: Nashville
Post: #181
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 10:38 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:00 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:23 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:17 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I have never equated Memphis and Cincy as "major" on the same level as Alabama and Clemson. But all four are DI/FBS and, as such, loosely aligned in the "major" (and highest) tier of college football. Clemson is "high-major/power" and Cincy is "major." It's really not that hard to see it this way.

Just add a "mid-" in front of that descriptor of Cincy (and the rest of the G5) and we agree, LOL. And no, I have not edited this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-major

I remember a few years ago there was a Power 7 Basketball page made (with the BE and A10) and a few passionate and unnamed posters here tried for days to have the page taken down and deleted. I suspect you have just created a similar chain reaction haha.

A10 averaged multiple NCAA tournaments appearances and had a paid TV deal with ESPN with significant number of TV appearances. It was and still is categorized as a major basketball conference.

Power definitely not. Coaches in the A10 make 650k to 1 million which is G5 type money.


I strongly consider the American, the A10 and the Mountain West as "major" men's hoops leagues — but not "power" leagues. I don't recall on this board any pro-AAC posters using "Power 7" designations. But to do so (then or now) would be absurd. I might go back and look for the posts.

There are only six power hoops leagues. If, in a crazy hypothetical, you had the best of the MWC, AAC and A10 and Gonzaga and BYU form a 12- to 15-team league that could land five to seven teams in the tourney per year and collectively average, say, 8,000 fans per game ... that would be the seventh "power" league. But that ain't happening.

As I've noted many times on this board, in men's hoops you can be a "major" to "high-major" program that is not a member of the P6. Gonzaga and Dayton are examples.
(This post was last modified: 09-29-2020 11:09 AM by bill dazzle.)
09-29-2020 10:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoldenWarrior11 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,679
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 607
I Root For: Marquette, BE
Location: Chicago
Post: #182
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 10:52 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:38 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:00 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:23 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:17 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I have never equated Memphis and Cincy as "major" on the same level as Alabama and Clemson. But all four are DI/FBS and, as such, loosely aligned in the "major" (and highest) tier of college football. Clemson is "high-major/power" and Cincy is "major." It's really not that hard to see it this way.

Just add a "mid-" in front of that descriptor of Cincy (and the rest of the G5) and we agree, LOL. And no, I have not edited this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-major

I remember a few years ago there was a Power 7 Basketball page made (with the BE and A10) and a few passionate and unnamed posters here tried for days to have the page taken down and deleted. I suspect you have just created a similar chain reaction haha.

A10 averaged multiple NCAA tournaments appearances and had a paid TV deal with ESPN with significant number of TV appearances. It was and still is categorized as a major basketball conference.

Power definitely not. Coaches in the A10 make 650k to 1 million which is G5 type money.


I strongly consider the American, the A10 and the Mountain West as "major" men's hoops leagues — but not "power" leagues. I don't recall on this board any pro-AAC posters using "Power 7" designations. But to do so (then or now) would be absurd. I might go back and look for the posts.

There are only six power hoops leagues. If, in a crazy hypothetical, you had the best of the MWC, AAC and A10 and Gonzaga form a 12- to 14-team league that could land five to seven teams in the tourney per year and collectively average, say, 8,000 fans per game ... that would be the seventh "power" league. But that ain't happening.

As I've noted many times on this board, in men's hoops you can be a "major" to "high-major" program that is not a member of the P6. Gonzaga and Dayton are examples.

Highly entertaining read. Good times. 03-lmfao

https://csnbbs.com/thread-800220.html
09-29-2020 11:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bill dazzle Offline
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast
*

Posts: 10,587
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 968
I Root For: Vandy/Memphis/DePaul/UNC
Location: Nashville
Post: #183
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 11:00 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:52 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:38 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:00 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:23 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  Just add a "mid-" in front of that descriptor of Cincy (and the rest of the G5) and we agree, LOL. And no, I have not edited this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-major

I remember a few years ago there was a Power 7 Basketball page made (with the BE and A10) and a few passionate and unnamed posters here tried for days to have the page taken down and deleted. I suspect you have just created a similar chain reaction haha.

A10 averaged multiple NCAA tournaments appearances and had a paid TV deal with ESPN with significant number of TV appearances. It was and still is categorized as a major basketball conference.

Power definitely not. Coaches in the A10 make 650k to 1 million which is G5 type money.


I strongly consider the American, the A10 and the Mountain West as "major" men's hoops leagues — but not "power" leagues. I don't recall on this board any pro-AAC posters using "Power 7" designations. But to do so (then or now) would be absurd. I might go back and look for the posts.

There are only six power hoops leagues. If, in a crazy hypothetical, you had the best of the MWC, AAC and A10 and Gonzaga form a 12- to 14-team league that could land five to seven teams in the tourney per year and collectively average, say, 8,000 fans per game ... that would be the seventh "power" league. But that ain't happening.

As I've noted many times on this board, in men's hoops you can be a "major" to "high-major" program that is not a member of the P6. Gonzaga and Dayton are examples.

Highly entertaining read. Good times. 03-lmfao

https://csnbbs.com/thread-800220.html


Just read ... sad.

Thanks for posting.
09-29-2020 11:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kit-Cat Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 125
I Root For: Championships
Location:

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #184
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 10:52 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:38 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:00 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:23 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:17 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  I have never equated Memphis and Cincy as "major" on the same level as Alabama and Clemson. But all four are DI/FBS and, as such, loosely aligned in the "major" (and highest) tier of college football. Clemson is "high-major/power" and Cincy is "major." It's really not that hard to see it this way.

Just add a "mid-" in front of that descriptor of Cincy (and the rest of the G5) and we agree, LOL. And no, I have not edited this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-major

I remember a few years ago there was a Power 7 Basketball page made (with the BE and A10) and a few passionate and unnamed posters here tried for days to have the page taken down and deleted. I suspect you have just created a similar chain reaction haha.

A10 averaged multiple NCAA tournaments appearances and had a paid TV deal with ESPN with significant number of TV appearances. It was and still is categorized as a major basketball conference.

Power definitely not. Coaches in the A10 make 650k to 1 million which is G5 type money.


I strongly consider the American, the A10 and the Mountain West as "major" men's hoops leagues — but not "power" leagues. I don't recall on this board any pro-AAC posters using "Power 7" designations. But to do so (then or now) would be absurd. I might go back and look for the posts.

There are only six power hoops leagues. If, in a crazy hypothetical, you had the best of the MWC, AAC and A10 and Gonzaga and BYU form a 12- to 15-team league that could land five to seven teams in the tourney per year and collectively average, say, 8,000 fans per game ... that would be the seventh "power" league. But that ain't happening.

As I've noted many times on this board, in men's hoops you can be a "major" to "high-major" program that is not a member of the P6. Gonzaga and Dayton are examples.

You can be a major program in a mid major conference.

A regular Top 40 program out of a mid major league. A team regularly good enough for a NCAA at-large berth.

I can't name another one in Gonzaga's situation at the moment. Wichita St in the MVC and VCU in the Colonial were others but they moved up to major conferences.
09-29-2020 11:49 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Captain Bearcat Offline
All-American in Everything
*

Posts: 9,500
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 768
I Root For: UC
Location: IL & Cincinnati, USA
Post: #185
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 03:23 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-28-2020 06:34 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-28-2020 04:40 PM)jedclampett Wrote:  
(09-28-2020 04:22 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-28-2020 04:19 PM)jedclampett Wrote:  Apparently, in your own mind, it is a tenable and accurate argument, simply because it is your own - - very highly esteemed - - opinion.


The way that you have glibly dismissed the very detailed evidence presented in the post that you responded to, it seems that you haven't given the actual data any serious consideration.


.


I glibly dismissed your non-existent "data" which was also just opinion.

I think it's pretty clear that most CFB fans do not consider G5 football to be major. The P5 are major.

.

Having just acknowledged that your first response was "glib" and "dismissiive," perhaps you would just as freely admit that this second response was equally glib and dismissive.

Yes, and deservedly so. See, you offer nothing but your own opinion - or the opinion of selected "esteemed sportswriters", but all that adds up to is ... your opinion.

Whereas my opinion is probably far more intersubjectively recognized. The belief that the P5 are major college football and the G5 are a lesser strata being pretty much the consensus about it, and correctly so.

Major conferences were traditionally defined by two characteristics.

A) National TV deal.
B) Multiple bowl and tournament bids.

Go back to the early 90's and the major conferences were BE, ACC, SEC, B1G, B8, SWC, PAC, WAC. Big West and MAC were not part of the CFA TV arrangement and considered full of programs that didn't meet the 1-A qualifications.

The power conference is a relatively new concept as the P5 made a quantum financial leap with its new TV deals to now put the ACC, SEC, XII, B1G, PAC in a different category than any non-P5 conference, regardless of the high visibility TV deal or multiple bids. BE, AAC, MWC filled with legacy major members were left behind.

It doesn't change the fact BE, AAC, MWC and others like the SBC and MAC which over time developed into multiple bowl leagues are categorically major conferences.

Major "conferences" didn't used to be important.

Major "programs" used to be important.

In 1980, no one really thought that Kansas State or Kansas had a better football program than BYU (WAC) or Tulane (Independent). Just because they were in the Big 8 and got their rear ends handed to them twice a year by Nebraska/Oklahoma?
09-29-2020 01:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,142
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2415
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #186
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 10:18 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:14 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 08:36 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 04:43 AM)Buckminster Fuller Wrote:  I recognize this is an internet message board, and we are all free to express our own opinion, but your post is written as if you are stating facts, not opinions. So, in all seriousness, if they are facts, I am curious to know if the above factors were considered and, if so how they played a part in the analysis. I will readily admit, I have not researched it, and there is nothing compelling you to do so simply to satisfy my curiosity. Just thought it would be interesting.

There was not a guideline by the NCAA but the B1G, PAC and those under the CFA TV contract (SEC, ACC, B8, SWC, WAC, Ind) were part of the major club. This includes BE football programs that were still independent and southern independents like Louisville and Memphis.

No, circa 1990, the major football conferences were the conferences that had a tie-in to the traditional major bowl games - the Rose, Sugar, Orange and Cotton Bowls.

So that was the SEC, B1G, PAC, SWC and Big 8. Those were the five major conferences. There were also a handful of independents that were recognized as major programs - Notre Dame, Penn State, FSU, WV, Miami, BC, Pitt and Syracuse being the obvious ones. Louisville and Memphis were not major. Some of those would soon form the Big East football conference, which was "major" at birth in 1991.

The ACC and Fiesta Bowl were special cases. The Fiesta Bowl, between 1986 - 1989 had basically become a "5th major" by throwing tons of money at top teams to play in its game. It was the maverick, the "independent major" among the bowls. The old boys club looked down its nose at it but they couldn't turn away its money, it bought its way in.

The ACC was clearly above the WAC and all the rest and also had the cachet of being the premier basketball conference, but wasn't quite at the same level. That's why they invited FSU, to take that next step.

So around 1990, you had five major conferences and four (five) major bowls, but with the ACC on the cusp of joining (or really, since the ACC had been a major football conference in the 1950s, re-joining, the club), and some of the major independents were on the verge of forming a major conference, the Big East or joining a conference, like FSU and Penn State.

CFA schools were all major regardless if they had a tie to big 4 bowl or not. By definition CFA was an association of major schools.

I was alive and well in the 1980s and no, not all CFA schools or conferences were regarded as major. If you had a tie to the major bowls, you were major.

If anything, the informal definition was even tighter back then - schools like Oregon State and Northwestern were in major conferences but nobody regarded them as major programs, whereas today if you are in a P5 conference you were major by definition.
09-29-2020 01:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bill dazzle Offline
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast
*

Posts: 10,587
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 968
I Root For: Vandy/Memphis/DePaul/UNC
Location: Nashville
Post: #187
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 11:49 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:52 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:38 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:00 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:23 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  Just add a "mid-" in front of that descriptor of Cincy (and the rest of the G5) and we agree, LOL. And no, I have not edited this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-major

I remember a few years ago there was a Power 7 Basketball page made (with the BE and A10) and a few passionate and unnamed posters here tried for days to have the page taken down and deleted. I suspect you have just created a similar chain reaction haha.

A10 averaged multiple NCAA tournaments appearances and had a paid TV deal with ESPN with significant number of TV appearances. It was and still is categorized as a major basketball conference.

Power definitely not. Coaches in the A10 make 650k to 1 million which is G5 type money.


I strongly consider the American, the A10 and the Mountain West as "major" men's hoops leagues — but not "power" leagues. I don't recall on this board any pro-AAC posters using "Power 7" designations. But to do so (then or now) would be absurd. I might go back and look for the posts.

There are only six power hoops leagues. If, in a crazy hypothetical, you had the best of the MWC, AAC and A10 and Gonzaga and BYU form a 12- to 15-team league that could land five to seven teams in the tourney per year and collectively average, say, 8,000 fans per game ... that would be the seventh "power" league. But that ain't happening.

As I've noted many times on this board, in men's hoops you can be a "major" to "high-major" program that is not a member of the P6. Gonzaga and Dayton are examples.

You can be a major program in a mid major conference.

A regular Top 40 program out of a mid major league. A team regularly good enough for a NCAA at-large berth.

I can't name another one in Gonzaga's situation at the moment. Wichita St in the MVC and VCU in the Colonial were others but they moved up to major conferences.

If we are characterizing the West Coast Conference (Gonzaga's home) as a "mid-major" league, I would also have BYU as a major to high-major program, just like Gonzaga.

Murray State offers a program that flirts with "major" status: great fan base, 1,662-904 all-time record, various players in the NBA. It is a member of the clearly mid-major OVC.
(This post was last modified: 09-29-2020 01:13 PM by bill dazzle.)
09-29-2020 01:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DawgNBama Offline
the Rush Limbaugh of CSNBBS
*

Posts: 8,372
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation: 456
I Root For: conservativism/MAGA
Location: US
Post: #188
Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
I have been wanting to add this comment to this particular thread for a very long time.

Due to their immense popularity, P5 rivalries tend to overshadow G5 rivalries, and that is a real shame, IMO, because some G5 rivalries are every bit as exciting and intense as some P5 rivalries are. To help popularize these G5 rivalries more, I have noticed that G5 conferences are scheduling G5 rivalries more in the middle of the season as opposed to Thanksgiving weekend like the P5's do. And I, for one, like that move. It's being more realistic about when the P5 teams will grab the most fans, but it also showcases the G5 conference more also.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
10-08-2020 01:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,142
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2415
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #189
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 11:49 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:52 AM)bill dazzle Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:38 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:00 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:23 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  Just add a "mid-" in front of that descriptor of Cincy (and the rest of the G5) and we agree, LOL. And no, I have not edited this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-major

I remember a few years ago there was a Power 7 Basketball page made (with the BE and A10) and a few passionate and unnamed posters here tried for days to have the page taken down and deleted. I suspect you have just created a similar chain reaction haha.

A10 averaged multiple NCAA tournaments appearances and had a paid TV deal with ESPN with significant number of TV appearances. It was and still is categorized as a major basketball conference.

Power definitely not. Coaches in the A10 make 650k to 1 million which is G5 type money.


I strongly consider the American, the A10 and the Mountain West as "major" men's hoops leagues — but not "power" leagues. I don't recall on this board any pro-AAC posters using "Power 7" designations. But to do so (then or now) would be absurd. I might go back and look for the posts.

There are only six power hoops leagues. If, in a crazy hypothetical, you had the best of the MWC, AAC and A10 and Gonzaga and BYU form a 12- to 15-team league that could land five to seven teams in the tourney per year and collectively average, say, 8,000 fans per game ... that would be the seventh "power" league. But that ain't happening.

As I've noted many times on this board, in men's hoops you can be a "major" to "high-major" program that is not a member of the P6. Gonzaga and Dayton are examples.

You can be a major program in a mid major conference.

Yes - Cincy and Memphis are good examples of that.
10-08-2020 09:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SMUstang Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,513
Joined: Jan 2004
I Root For: SMU Mustangs
Location: Horseshoe Bay, Texas
Post: #190
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-19-2020 03:42 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  Before the 1980s, Tulane and SMU were known.

Tulane was known for it's SEC membership and the Sugar Bowl.
SMU was known for it's SWC membership and the Cotton Bowl.
10-29-2020 01:22 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
schmolik Offline
CSNBB's Big 10 Cheerleader
*

Posts: 8,687
Joined: Sep 2019
Reputation: 651
I Root For: UIUC, PSU, Nova
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Post: #191
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(09-29-2020 01:10 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:18 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:14 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 08:36 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 04:43 AM)Buckminster Fuller Wrote:  I recognize this is an internet message board, and we are all free to express our own opinion, but your post is written as if you are stating facts, not opinions. So, in all seriousness, if they are facts, I am curious to know if the above factors were considered and, if so how they played a part in the analysis. I will readily admit, I have not researched it, and there is nothing compelling you to do so simply to satisfy my curiosity. Just thought it would be interesting.

There was not a guideline by the NCAA but the B1G, PAC and those under the CFA TV contract (SEC, ACC, B8, SWC, WAC, Ind) were part of the major club. This includes BE football programs that were still independent and southern independents like Louisville and Memphis.

No, circa 1990, the major football conferences were the conferences that had a tie-in to the traditional major bowl games - the Rose, Sugar, Orange and Cotton Bowls.

So that was the SEC, B1G, PAC, SWC and Big 8. Those were the five major conferences. There were also a handful of independents that were recognized as major programs - Notre Dame, Penn State, FSU, WV, Miami, BC, Pitt and Syracuse being the obvious ones. Louisville and Memphis were not major. Some of those would soon form the Big East football conference, which was "major" at birth in 1991.

The ACC and Fiesta Bowl were special cases. The Fiesta Bowl, between 1986 - 1989 had basically become a "5th major" by throwing tons of money at top teams to play in its game. It was the maverick, the "independent major" among the bowls. The old boys club looked down its nose at it but they couldn't turn away its money, it bought its way in.

The ACC was clearly above the WAC and all the rest and also had the cachet of being the premier basketball conference, but wasn't quite at the same level. That's why they invited FSU, to take that next step.

So around 1990, you had five major conferences and four (five) major bowls, but with the ACC on the cusp of joining (or really, since the ACC had been a major football conference in the 1950s, re-joining, the club), and some of the major independents were on the verge of forming a major conference, the Big East or joining a conference, like FSU and Penn State.

CFA schools were all major regardless if they had a tie to big 4 bowl or not. By definition CFA was an association of major schools.

I was alive and well in the 1980s and no, not all CFA schools or conferences were regarded as major. If you had a tie to the major bowls, you were major.

If anything, the informal definition was even tighter back then - schools like Oregon State and Northwestern were in major conferences but nobody regarded them as major programs, whereas today if you are in a P5 conference you were major by definition.

I don't remember the revenue sharing to all conference members back in the 80's/90's and even if they did they didn't share anywhere near the amount of money they do today. That's the big difference. A bad Big Ten or SEC team still gets paid well.
10-29-2020 07:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,142
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2415
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #192
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
(10-29-2020 07:33 PM)schmolik Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 01:10 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 10:18 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 09:14 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(09-29-2020 08:36 AM)Kit-Cat Wrote:  There was not a guideline by the NCAA but the B1G, PAC and those under the CFA TV contract (SEC, ACC, B8, SWC, WAC, Ind) were part of the major club. This includes BE football programs that were still independent and southern independents like Louisville and Memphis.

No, circa 1990, the major football conferences were the conferences that had a tie-in to the traditional major bowl games - the Rose, Sugar, Orange and Cotton Bowls.

So that was the SEC, B1G, PAC, SWC and Big 8. Those were the five major conferences. There were also a handful of independents that were recognized as major programs - Notre Dame, Penn State, FSU, WV, Miami, BC, Pitt and Syracuse being the obvious ones. Louisville and Memphis were not major. Some of those would soon form the Big East football conference, which was "major" at birth in 1991.

The ACC and Fiesta Bowl were special cases. The Fiesta Bowl, between 1986 - 1989 had basically become a "5th major" by throwing tons of money at top teams to play in its game. It was the maverick, the "independent major" among the bowls. The old boys club looked down its nose at it but they couldn't turn away its money, it bought its way in.

The ACC was clearly above the WAC and all the rest and also had the cachet of being the premier basketball conference, but wasn't quite at the same level. That's why they invited FSU, to take that next step.

So around 1990, you had five major conferences and four (five) major bowls, but with the ACC on the cusp of joining (or really, since the ACC had been a major football conference in the 1950s, re-joining, the club), and some of the major independents were on the verge of forming a major conference, the Big East or joining a conference, like FSU and Penn State.

CFA schools were all major regardless if they had a tie to big 4 bowl or not. By definition CFA was an association of major schools.

I was alive and well in the 1980s and no, not all CFA schools or conferences were regarded as major. If you had a tie to the major bowls, you were major.

If anything, the informal definition was even tighter back then - schools like Oregon State and Northwestern were in major conferences but nobody regarded them as major programs, whereas today if you are in a P5 conference you were major by definition.

I don't remember the revenue sharing to all conference members back in the 80's/90's and even if they did they didn't share anywhere near the amount of money they do today. That's the big difference. A bad Big Ten or SEC team still gets paid well.

Yes, conference payouts were far smaller.

For example, it wasn't until 1998 that Baylor's athletic budget hit $10 million.

This mirrors revenue in all major sports. E.g., that same year, 1998, when Michael Jordan was finishing his run of titles with the Bulls, total NBA revenues were $1.8 Billion, or about $2.4 Billion in today's dollars. Today it is $9 Billion.
(This post was last modified: 10-29-2020 09:33 PM by quo vadis.)
10-29-2020 09:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jedclampett Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,542
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation: 149
I Root For: Temple
Location:
Post: #193
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
.

The Group of Five, in FB, has become the "Group of Thrive."

Including the independents, there are currently seven non-P5 teams in the week 9 coaches poll:

#6 Cincy
#9 BYU
#15 Marshall
#16 Coastal Carolina
#18 SMU
#22 Army
#23 Boise State

Having two non-P5 teams in the top 10 is a noteworthy accomplishment, in and of itself.

In addition, eight non-P5 teams received votes in the poll, two of which are in the top 30.
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2020 09:34 PM by jedclampett.)
11-01-2020 09:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jedclampett Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,542
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation: 149
I Root For: Temple
Location:
Post: #194
RE: Predictions: The Future of the Group of Five (G5)
.

The week 9 AP top 25 confirms that the G5 is the Group of Thrive:

7 non-P5 teams in the top 25

2 non-P5 teams in the top 10

9 non-P5 teams in the top 30
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2020 11:09 PM by jedclampett.)
11-01-2020 11:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.