***Didn't spend that much time updating this from a thread I made last year, let me know if I left off any games***
East Division:

USF (7-8)
2014: Maryland L, NCSU L, @WISC L
2015: @FSU L, @Maryland L, Syracuse W
2016: @Syracuse W, FSU L, N South C. W
2017: ILL. W, N Texas Tech W
2018: GT W, N ILL. W
2019: Wisc. L, @GT L
Home: 3-4 Road: 1-4 Neutral: 3-0

Cincy (6-5)
2014: @Ohio St. L, @Miami L, N VT L
2015: Miami W
2016: @Purdue W
2017: @Michigan L
2018: @UCLA W, N VT W
2019: UCLA W, @Ohio St. L, N BC W

Home: 2-0 Road: 2-4 Neutral: 2-1

ECU (5-9)
2014: @South C. L, @VT W, UNC W, N Florida L
2015: @Florida L, VT W
2016: NCSU W, @South C. L, @VT L
2017: @WVU L, VT L
2018: UNC W, @NCSU L
2019: @NCSU L

Home: 4-1 Road: 1-7 Neutral: 0-1

Temple (5-7)
2014: @Vandy W, @PSU L
2015: PSU W, ND L
2016: @PSU L, N WF L
2017: @ND L
2018: @Maryland W, @BC L, N Duke L
2019: Maryland W, GT W

Home: 3-1 Road: 2-4 Neutral: 0-2

UCF (4-9)
2014: N PSU L, @Mizzou L, N NCSU L
2015: @Stanford L, @South C. L
2016: @Michigan L, Maryland L
2017: @Maryland W, N Auburn W
2018: Pitt W, N LSU L
2019: Stanford W, @Pitt L

Home: 2-1 Road: 1-5 Neutral: 1-3

West Division:

UH (8-4)
2014: N Pitt W
2015: @UL W, Vandy W, N FSU W
2016: OU W, UL W
2017: @Ariz. W, Texas Tech L
2018: Ariz. W, @Texas Tech L
2019: @OU L, N WSU L

Home: 4-1 Road: 2-2 Neutral: 2-1

Navy (4-4)
2015: @ND L, N Pitt W
2016: ND W
2017: @ND L, N UVA W
2018: ND L
2019: @ND L, N KSU W

Home: 1-1 Road: 0-3 Neutral: 3-0

Memphis (5-8)
2014: @UCLA L, @Ole Miss L
2015: @KU W, Ole Miss W, N Auburn L
2016: KU W, @Ole Miss L
2017: UCLA W, N ISU L
2018: @Mizzou L, N WF L
2019: Ole Miss W, N PSU L

Home: 4-0 Road: 1-4 Neutral: 0-4

SMU (1-10)
2014: @Baylor L, TAMU L, TCU L
2015: Baylor L, @TCU L
2016: @Baylor L, TCU L
2017: @TCU L
2018: TCU L, @Michigan L
2019: @SMU

Home: 0-5 Road: 1-5 Neutral: 0-0

Tulsa (0-9)
2014: OU L
2015: @OU L, N VT L
2016: @Ohio St. L
2017: @OKSt. L
2018: @UT L, @ARK L
2019: @Mich St. L, OKSt. L

Home: 0-2 Road: 0-6 Neutral: 0-1

Tulane (0-10)
2014: GT L, @Duke L, @Rutgers L
2015: Duke L, @GT L
2016: @WF L
2017: @OU L
2018: WF L, @Ohio St. L
2019: @Auburn L

Home: 0-3 Road: 0-7 Neutral: 0-0


Conference Totals:
Total: 45-83 = .352
Home: 23-19 = .548
Road: 12-50 = .194
Neutral: 11-13 = .458

Division Totals:
East:
Total: 27-38 = .415
Home: 14-7 = .667
Road: 8-24 = .225
Neutral: 6-7 = .462

West:
Total: 18-45 = .286
Home: 9-12 = .429
Road: 4-27 = .129
Neutral: 5-6 = .455

Couple notables:
The East minus UConn is stout
SMU notched its first P5 win with their win against TCU last year
Cincy now has the best win percentage against P5's in the East division
Navy and Memphis have reverse fortune in bowl games

Drop SMU, Tulsa, and Tulane and the other 8 have a record that is not too shabby.

P6!

Records of a few schools that get tossed around as expansion options:
AF: 2-3
App St: 2-7
Army: 2-11
Boise: 7-6
BYU: 11-17
CSU: 4-10
Marshall: 1-4
SDSU: 5-5
UAB: 0-4

I understand why Connecticut was excluded but their games were still technically AAC games and should count towards the overall record. Louisville and Rutgers would count, too, if the playoffs had started a year earlier.

Connecticut (1-9)
2014: 0-0
2015: 0-1, L @ Missouri
2016: 1-2, W vs Virginia, L vs Syracuse, L @ Boston College
2017: 0-3, L @ Virginia, L vs Missouri, L vs Boston College
2018: 0-1, L @ Syracuse
2019: 0-2, L vs Illinois, L @ Indiana
H: 1-4 / A: 0-5

Conference Totals:
Total: 46-92 = .333
Home: 24-23 = .511
Road: 12-55 = .179
Neutral: 11-13 = .458

Division Totals:
East:
Total: 28-47 = .373
Home: 15-11 = .577
Road: 8-29 = .216
Neutral: 6-7 = .462

Not that it really matters. The AAC is better off without the Huskies. Very few holes in the conference, top-to-bottom.

(08-25-2020 06:25 PM)BePcr07 Wrote:  I understand why Connecticut was excluded but their games were still technically AAC games and should count towards the overall record. Louisville and Rutgers would count, too, if the playoffs had started a year earlier.

Connecticut (1-9)
2014: 0-0
2015: 0-1, L @ Missouri
2016: 1-2, W vs Virginia, L vs Syracuse, L @ Boston College
2017: 0-3, L @ Virginia, L vs Missouri, L vs Boston College
2018: 0-1, L @ Syracuse
2019: 0-2, L vs Illinois, L @ Indiana
H: 1-4 / A: 0-5

Conference Totals:
Total: 46-92 = .333
Home: 24-23 = .511
Road: 12-55 = .179
Neutral: 11-13 = .458

Division Totals:
East:
Total: 28-47 = .373
Home: 15-11 = .577
Road: 8-29 = .216
Neutral: 6-7 = .462

Not that it really matters. The AAC is better off without the Huskies. Very few holes in the conference, top-to-bottom.

I disagree. If a quality program leaves we wouldn't have a right to try and still lay claim to their wins. That we should have to still claim UConn's losses is absurd.

(08-25-2020 06:29 PM)WhoseHouse? Wrote:  

(08-25-2020 06:25 PM)BePcr07 Wrote:  I understand why Connecticut was excluded but their games were still technically AAC games and should count towards the overall record. Louisville and Rutgers would count, too, if the playoffs had started a year earlier.

Connecticut (1-9)
2014: 0-0
2015: 0-1, L @ Missouri
2016: 1-2, W vs Virginia, L vs Syracuse, L @ Boston College
2017: 0-3, L @ Virginia, L vs Missouri, L vs Boston College
2018: 0-1, L @ Syracuse
2019: 0-2, L vs Illinois, L @ Indiana
H: 1-4 / A: 0-5

Conference Totals:
Total: 46-92 = .333
Home: 24-23 = .511
Road: 12-55 = .179
Neutral: 11-13 = .458

Division Totals:
East:
Total: 28-47 = .373
Home: 15-11 = .577
Road: 8-29 = .216
Neutral: 6-7 = .462

Not that it really matters. The AAC is better off without the Huskies. Very few holes in the conference, top-to-bottom.

I disagree. If a quality program leaves we wouldn't have a right to try and still lay claim to their wins. That we should have to still claim UConn's losses is absurd.

And it’s not like we kicked them out. They left us for what they call greener pastures.

(08-25-2020 06:36 PM)NoQuarterBrigade Wrote:  

(08-25-2020 06:29 PM)WhoseHouse? Wrote:  

(08-25-2020 06:25 PM)BePcr07 Wrote:  I understand why Connecticut was excluded but their games were still technically AAC games and should count towards the overall record. Louisville and Rutgers would count, too, if the playoffs had started a year earlier.

Connecticut (1-9)
2014: 0-0
2015: 0-1, L @ Missouri
2016: 1-2, W vs Virginia, L vs Syracuse, L @ Boston College
2017: 0-3, L @ Virginia, L vs Missouri, L vs Boston College
2018: 0-1, L @ Syracuse
2019: 0-2, L vs Illinois, L @ Indiana
H: 1-4 / A: 0-5

Conference Totals:
Total: 46-92 = .333
Home: 24-23 = .511
Road: 12-55 = .179
Neutral: 11-13 = .458

Division Totals:
East:
Total: 28-47 = .373
Home: 15-11 = .577
Road: 8-29 = .216
Neutral: 6-7 = .462

Not that it really matters. The AAC is better off without the Huskies. Very few holes in the conference, top-to-bottom.

I disagree. If a quality program leaves we wouldn't have a right to try and still lay claim to their wins. That we should have to still claim UConn's losses is absurd.

And it’s not like we kicked them out. They left us for what they call greener pastures.

No one would let us get away with laying claim to their national championship in basketball. When a team leaves they take their results with them. Good or bad.

Three of those games I really wish we could have back (2014 Penn State @Dublin, 2016 Maryland, 2019 @Pitt). Lost on a last second field goal, in OT, and on a last-second trick play, respectively.

We haven't played any neutral games.

EDIT: Didn't realize you meant bowl games too. You forgot our slaughtering by UNC.