(10-23-2020 11:09 AM)BatonRougeEscapee Wrote:  Win or lose on Nov 3rd, Trump should just pardon him once the election is final. End this charade for good.

I wouldn't mind seeing it go to the Supreme Court. Sullivan would get slapped down so hard. 8-1. Only the stupid Latina would vote for the judge. RBG would never even vote for the judge on this case.

So am I understanding right, they were supposed to have a ruling on Monday, and today the judge does this.

Hmm.. Seems a little bit of team over country stuff.. Of course Tom is excited and trying to take a victory lap.

Wake me when it is over...

Quote:Working thread: check back for updates.

Congratulations to the lawyers who worked all weekend to meet Judge Emmet Sullivan’s deadline to certify all the documents (with just eight explicit caveats and then another slew built in) submitted in the Mike Flynn motion to dismiss proceeding. I doubted you could pull it off time-wise. In your rush you seem to have provided Judge Sullivan even more evidence that nothing about this proceeding is normal.

Effectively, the certification (signed by Jocelyn Ballantine, with individual declarations signed by three others, in part because there are things that Ballantine almost certainly knows are inaccurate or include material omissions), says there have been no material alterations to the documents submitted in the proceeding except for:

1. Redactions done in the name of classification, law enforcement sensitive, or privacy that serve to hide material information pertaining to Brandon Van Grack, Bill Barnett, and the reason a third document was altered by adding a date (at a minimum)

2. A set of texts where “irrelevant information and excess metadata” was excluded and an error introduced in the process of creating a table showing “corrected date, corrected time,” which raises far more questions about the provenance of the document

3. The Bill Barnett interview report that DOJ had submitted to Sullivan as “a 302” is instead a “report” that is not being certified in normal fashion, in part, because DOJ is hiding redactions that withhold material information about Brandon Van Grack

4. An NSL declaration done by Jocelyn Ballantine that may hide the existence of at least one earlier financial NSL served on Mike Flynn that WDMO didn’t ask her to summarize

5. A new set of text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page that DOJ admits they’re not relying on (but nevertheless committed an additional Privacy Act violation in releasing), which was not redacted to hide personal information

6. Three documents submitted by Sidney Powell that DOJ won’t certify (two of which, however, are probably more accurate than what DOJ has submitted)

7. “Unintelligible” markings in transcripts of notes where DOJ was unsuccessful at getting the author or their lawyer to conduct a last minute review over a matter of hours on a Sunday (DOJ does not specify how many of their transcripts this includes); some of these appear significant

8. Inconsistencies on how redactions and unintelligible text were marked in transcriptions which, in some cases, is affirmatively misleading

9. A claim that both Strzok and McCabe’s lawyers had reviewed their handwritten notes and agreed that “the content of those exhibits was not altered,” as of last week, only Strzok’s lawyer had

10. Lots of documents where the certification doesn’t list the Bates numbers, with some hilarious results

11. Inconsistencies on whether DOJ certifies all copies of a particular document that got submitted multiple times, which in one case would raise questions about the production of these documents

12. An admission that, for some reason, the motion to dismiss didn’t rely on the final 302 of Flynn’s January 24, 2017 interview

13. A new inaccurate date, ironically on a Kevin Clinesmith email

Page not found.

RWT fail.

So a random tweeter has the inside scoop.

This you believe, but not actual disks from Hunter Biden's computer.

You actually called that Russian Disinformation.

Please go outside and apologize to the plants making oxygen for you're "team over country" dishonest ass.

It fits his narrative, so accuracy doesn’t matter.

(10-27-2020 09:16 AM)banker Wrote:  It fits his narrative, so accuracy doesn’t matter.

Huh?