Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Climate change selective data
Author Message
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,967
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3320
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #1
Climate change selective data
https://www.realclearmarkets.com/article...96588.html

Author argues that the climate change cult is afraid of change and that change may be beneficial.

"...The NBER’s extreme case projection that if the earth’s temperature rises by 0.04 degrees Celsius per year through 2100 (five times the actual rate of increase since 1880), total U.S. GDP will be 10.52 percent lower in 2100 than it would otherwise be, similarly would leave GDP per person about 172 percent higher.

In other words, after taking account of the supposedly harmful impact of global warming, U.S. income per person in 2100 will be about triple today’s level.

Don’t swallow the big lie. Check the data. Global warming has not been harmful and presents no danger to future generations."
06-20-2020 03:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,590
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #2
RE: Climate change selective data
(06-20-2020 03:08 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.realclearmarkets.com/article...96588.html

Author argues that the climate change cult is afraid of change and that change may be beneficial.

"...The NBER’s extreme case projection that if the earth’s temperature rises by 0.04 degrees Celsius per year through 2100 (five times the actual rate of increase since 1880), total U.S. GDP will be 10.52 percent lower in 2100 than it would otherwise be, similarly would leave GDP per person about 172 percent higher.

In other words, after taking account of the supposedly harmful impact of global warming, U.S. income per person in 2100 will be about triple today’s level.

Don’t swallow the big lie. Check the data. Global warming has not been harmful and presents no danger to future generations."

I think illogical hysteria has doomed the climate change agenda. People understand far more than the experts give the populace credit for. For example, higher temps in theory can melt the ice caps and possibly cause the sea levels to rise. But regular folks intuitively know that weather predictions are a dicey proposition. Scientist deride this challenge and thus miss the underlying query; The planet's climate is a multi-variable equations with numerous inputs, why are the PhD's boiling it down to an IF ---> THEN statement?
06-20-2020 08:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.