(10-25-2021 08:07 AM)LaTechBanjo Wrote: (10-23-2021 07:44 PM)Saint3333 Wrote: Appreciate your comments and would like to believe you, but your comments seem to be the exception not the rule.
The SBC had the opportunity to add any remaining CUSA school and App pushed for Marshall, ODU and JMU and the western members didn’t push for LA Tech at all. You have to ask yourself why not. LA Tech was clearly the better add on the filed as well as location for the majority of the members.
2 things.
Knowing the politics of Louisiana, ULL and ULM would certainly vote for Tech to be included in the SBC. Whether or not they'd secretly sabotage such a vote, as has been suggested by some ULL posters, I doubt it. But I suppose it's possible.
The most likely read in this situation is that App and Coastal had options (CUSA/maybe AAC). The western SBC teams really didn't. In order to keep the band together, you had to appease App. This is why if CUSA had made some real overtures to ULL early on, the script may have been flipped. Instead, USM drove the bus on getting to the SBC west, which gave the conference enough leverage with the west teams to placate the potential defectors in the east.
Said another way, App State was driving the bus on the SBC adds, because they were the most likely to vacate otherwise.
Just to clarify a few things within this post.
1. LaTech is an institutional fit, both academically and athletically. They are a rural university within the footprint, it makes all the sense in the world for them to be included.
2. Tommy McClennan isn’t a one off AD making ignorant and disparaging comments regarding the SBC and the two programs within Louisiana that are in the SBC. The same comments were made by Derek Dooley and every AD after the formation of the original SBC. So from an institutional stance LaTech views themselves as superior to the SBC.
3. Southern Miss, let’s delve into that situation. USM has been in talks with the SBC for 2.5 years. This wasn’t a new development, USM has been positioning itself for a move out of CUSA for over 2 years. The administration has long recognized that USM is also an institutional fit in the SBC. Smack dab in the middle of the footprint. Their move to the SBC was always going to happen.
4. The position LaTech finds itself in falls squarely on the shoulders of the LaTech President, AD and Boosters. It’s not the fault of the 6 that left for the AAC or the 3 programs leaving for the SBC.
5. The AAC was presented a plan to invite high on field performance programs. I’m sure LaTech was on that list. Along with many other programs. Mostly from medium to small markets. The AAC presidents wanted markets, because that is the identity and makeup of that league. Nothing any medium/small market program could do to change that.
6. This myth of any program being scared to be associated with, compete against LaTech is absolute rubbish. Both ULM, stAte, Louisiana and any western SBC would gladly agree to long term H&H contracts with LaTech in football and other sports. The truth is none of those programs “need” LaTech, we have a tight footprint and regional rivalries. LaTech doesn’t “need” those program either, otherwise the stance of the administration would be completely different if they did.
The bottom line here is LaTech is exactly where they want to be. I read that LaTech wants or has bigger aspirations than the SBC. That the SBC is not the ultimate goal. But the SBC will be the premier eastern G5 league in 2023.
So what’s the actual end game for LaTech?