TripleA
Legend
Posts: 58,536
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3168
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer
|
Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(This post was last modified: 03-25-2020 03:32 AM by TripleA.)
|
|
03-25-2020 03:04 AM |
|
WKUYG
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14,171
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 1653
I Root For: WKU
Location:
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
I see the government, took AOC's advice, to print more money....
in the end probably less deaths than most flu seasons. Did not have to be this way. Where's my check!
|
|
03-25-2020 03:29 AM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,843
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7015
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 03:29 AM)WKUYG Wrote: I see the government, took AOC's advice, to print more money....
in the end probably less deaths than most flu seasons. Did not have to be this way. Where's my check!
yep...it did not have to go down this longer term path to destruction...
sometimes, culling is a better long term solution at 'weigh-in'....
|
|
03-25-2020 04:59 AM |
|
Fort Bend Owl
Legend
Posts: 28,381
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 448
I Root For: An easy win
Location:
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
|
|
03-25-2020 06:24 AM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,843
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7015
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
the bold text we agree upon....
if san fran nan puts it to a voice vote, it only takes one to defeat....
she's in the shitestorm that she created......I hope that biatch chokes on her martinis or phlegm....
|
|
03-25-2020 06:38 AM |
|
TripleA
Legend
Posts: 58,536
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3168
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location: The woods of Bammer
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
I'm not so sure. Amash already posted a tweet in strong opposition to it.
(This post was last modified: 03-25-2020 06:44 AM by TripleA.)
|
|
03-25-2020 06:42 AM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,669
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 975
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 06:42 AM)TripleA Wrote: (03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
I'm not so sure. Amash already posted a tweet in strong opposition to it.
Yes, but he know's there is ZERO chance this does not pass. Therefore, he's safe putting out his opposition to it.
We probably need this to pass so we can move along, but I'm afraid we'll see that this was littered with the usual big government giveaways to influential lawmakers pet projects as these monstrous bills always do.
|
|
03-25-2020 07:10 AM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,843
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7015
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 07:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (03-25-2020 06:42 AM)TripleA Wrote: (03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
I'm not so sure. Amash already posted a tweet in strong opposition to it.
Yes, but he know's there is ZERO chance this does not pass. Therefore, he's safe putting out his opposition to it.
We probably need this to pass so we can move along, but I'm afraid we'll see that this was littered with the usual big government giveaways to influential lawmakers pet projects as these monstrous bills always do.
you mean the one san fran nan proposed that was beyond laden with pork???
SOOIE FK'N CHOPPED SUEY
|
|
03-25-2020 07:15 AM |
|
JMUDunk
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud
Posts: 29,577
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 1731
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
|
Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
Planned parenthood- Chinese flu issue check.
Kennedy center- Chinese flu issue check
Airline emissions- Chinese flu issue check
Big Ass fans to kill birds- Chinese flu issue check
Sop to solar panels tax credit- Chinese flu issue check
End fracking and oil drilling- Chinese flu issue check
More broads on Corp boards- Chinese flu issue check
Union thug enrichment plan- Chinese flu issue check
Fake “minimum wage” for people taking out the trash and mopping floors- Chinese flu issue check
Federalize elections-Chinese flu issue check
Cancel college kids spring break party tabs-Chinese flu issue check
Aaaaand there’s a hella lot more in there than that. Need I post more?
When can we impeeesh Nan for withholding aid to the American people? Is THIS not an issue of national security?
But stupid ass crap like Ukraine was?!?
You leftists are so screwed up you don’t even know which sideline or neutral corner to go to.
Sad.
Just. Sad. smdh
|
|
03-25-2020 07:34 AM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,843
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7015
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 07:34 AM)JMUDunk Wrote: Planned parenthood- Chinese flu issue check.
Kennedy center- Chinese flu issue check
Airline emissions- Chinese flu issue check
Big Ass fans to kill birds- Chinese flu issue check
Sop to solar panels tax credit- Chinese flu issue check
End fracking and oil drilling- Chinese flu issue check
More broads on Corp boards- Chinese flu issue check
Union thug enrichment plan- Chinese flu issue check
Fake “minimum wage” for people taking out the trash and mopping floors- Chinese flu issue check
Federalize elections-Chinese flu issue check
Cancel college kids spring break party tabs-Chinese flu issue check
Aaaaand there’s a hella lot more in there than that. Need I post more?
When can we impeeesh Nan for withholding aid to the American people? Is THIS not an issue of national security?
But stupid ass crap like Ukraine was?!?
You leftists are so screwed up you don’t even know which sideline or neutral corner to go to.
Sad.
Just. Sad. smdh
biatches be punch drunk on da 'whoop juice and botox'....
TO INFINITY AND BEYOND
|
|
03-25-2020 07:51 AM |
|
200yrs2late
Resident Parrothead
Posts: 15,343
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 767
I Root For: East Carolina
Location: SE of disorder
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
Let's see the earmarks.
|
|
03-25-2020 07:53 AM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,843
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7015
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 07:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote: Let's see the earmarks.
yeah, it's going to be interesting how san fran nan plays this one.....she's fk'd and knows it....
however, she's a fk'n KKKunt.....don't be surprised if the balloons get filled with He.....
|
|
03-25-2020 07:55 AM |
|
miko33
Defender of Honesty and Integrity
Posts: 13,141
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 853
I Root For: Alma Mater
Location:
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 07:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (03-25-2020 06:42 AM)TripleA Wrote: (03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
I'm not so sure. Amash already posted a tweet in strong opposition to it.
Yes, but he know's there is ZERO chance this does not pass. Therefore, he's safe putting out his opposition to it.
We probably need this to pass so we can move along, but I'm afraid we'll see that this was littered with the usual big government giveaways to influential lawmakers pet projects as these monstrous bills always do.
That's your "principled and wholesome" Justin Amash. No doubt Tom that he's only blasting it because he knows he'll get cover from plenty of other Reps who wouldn't be dumb enough to kill a bill meant to rescue the economy from the quarantines.
However, what if other idiots think the same way and the bill actually fails? This is why ******** like Amash need to shut up and do their job.
|
|
03-25-2020 08:16 AM |
|
gdunn
Repping E-Gang Colors
Posts: 30,332
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2450
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
This morning what I read this one was geared more towards those who were laid off which in my opinion is better. I'd rather the folks laid off get a check than me. I've been guaranteed my salary for the foreseeable future.
|
|
03-25-2020 08:33 AM |
|
bullet
Legend
Posts: 66,655
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3300
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 06:38 AM)stinkfist Wrote: (03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
the bold text we agree upon....
if san fran nan puts it to a voice vote, it only takes one to defeat....
she's in the shitestorm that she created......I hope that biatch chokes on her martinis or phlegm....
It was a long long time before they allowed voting by button. It was done manually.
|
|
03-25-2020 08:54 AM |
|
bullet
Legend
Posts: 66,655
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3300
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 07:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote: Let's see the earmarks.
Schumer made it a point to mention that Trump and Pence's businesses couldn't get any payments. He apparently couldn't just say that all Congressmen, cabinet members, President and V-P don't get payments. For once, they exempt themselves from something good. Somehow I think the rules on what constitutes ownership will written to exempt Schumer and other leadership.
|
|
03-25-2020 08:57 AM |
|
shere khan
Southerner
Posts: 60,740
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7534
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
Lazy stupid prog filth democrats are the hold up now.
Democrats hate America.
|
|
03-25-2020 08:59 AM |
|
Eagleaidaholic
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,099
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 778
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 08:59 AM)shere khan Wrote: (03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
Lazy stupid prog filth democrats are the hold up now.
Democrats hate America.
Yep. Just heard on the Kilmeade show that Congress is not planning on meeting today. Can't find a link yet. Look to the stock market to see how they react in coming minutes.
|
|
03-25-2020 10:00 AM |
|
Attackcoog
Moderator
Posts: 44,829
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2880
I Root For: Houston
Location:
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
(03-25-2020 10:00 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote: (03-25-2020 08:59 AM)shere khan Wrote: (03-25-2020 06:24 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: From what I am reading, the House is not in DC currently (or at least the full House). If Pelosi can get a unanimous passage, they can get that done remotely without a vote. But if not, they do need to somehow get back to DC which could be tough since airlines have really cut back on their flights. Remote voting isn't possible (again that seems like such an archaic rule), but they can do some sort of proxy vote?
In any case, I suspect very few people are going to vote nay and it will pass in the House somehow today.
Lazy stupid prog filth democrats are the hold up now.
Democrats hate America.
Yep. Just heard on the Kilmeade show that Congress is not planning on meeting today. Can't find a link yet. Look to the stock market to see how they react in coming minutes.
Yeah---the way I understand it---there will be no vote. They want to use the a unanimous consent mechanism. In other words, if one house member opposes it---then it wont pass. If that occurs, then Nancy will introduce the Democrat House Bill and negotiations to complete the will begin on that. The assumption is that they will then pass that and move to a joint committee to hammer out a compromise between the Senate and House bills. What I dont understand is how is the House bill going to get passed without meeting? If the Senate bill cant get unanimous consent---I guarantee the Democrat House Bill will not win unanimous consent. So, if they meet---will the Senate Bill at least get an opportunity to be voted on--or will it get shelved in favor of this nut job Pelosi Bill?
(This post was last modified: 03-25-2020 10:58 AM by Attackcoog.)
|
|
03-25-2020 10:56 AM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach
Posts: 80,764
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3208
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX
|
RE: Finally, we have a deal in the Senate, but...
I think--and truly hope--that Pelosi may have realized that she overplayed her hand. If democrats get portrayed as having held up aid to push a socialist/communist side agenda, that could be a major election issue that could hurt them badly. I'm guessing Schumer has told her, "We got a deal. STFU."
Of course, it that situation arises, it brings up two questions. One, would the MSM cover it objectively? And two, would the stupid republicans even be able to figure out how to use it?
(This post was last modified: 03-25-2020 11:11 AM by Owl 69/70/75.)
|
|
03-25-2020 11:11 AM |
|