(03-06-2020 11:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 09:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2020 05:53 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-05-2020 02:32 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I get all that, but SCOTUS decisions interpret the Constitution...and they ruled that they are constitutional under the 14th amendment.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/roe-v-wade

You do know the SCOTUS also ruled slavery was fine.

So... we're all OK with the court revisiting prior decisions, right?

As long as it's in the course of another case...of course...that's one of their purposes. But no, they don't just decide to go back and revisit a decision...and I assume that's not what you were saying.

Maybe "revisit" was ambiguous. But you seem to understand my point.

The SCOTUS is not infallible. The justices do make mistakes. For example, saying that it's OK to kill babies was a mistake. It needs to be rectified.

Well, it wasn't "killing babies" until the right wing political machine took it over.

Well, they weren't advocating doing them at 9 months gestation or "letting it die on the table" if it survived outside the womb either........

(03-06-2020 01:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 01:01 PM)natibeast21 Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 09:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  As long as it's in the course of another case...of course...that's one of their purposes. But no, they don't just decide to go back and revisit a decision...and I assume that's not what you were saying.

Maybe "revisit" was ambiguous. But you seem to understand my point.

The SCOTUS is not infallible. The justices do make mistakes. For example, saying that it's OK to kill babies was a mistake. It needs to be rectified.

Well, it wasn't "killing babies" until the right wing political machine took it over.

Do you think the reason the left is pro abortion is because "women's body/health/rights" or "population control"..?

I'm talking about the real decision maker's on the left. Not the general public.

1. I don't know of anyone who is PRO abortion. I support the right to choose, but I'd prefer all are given up for adoption...or prevented from the get go with contraception and more education. (Rape/Incest/Health excepted).
2. When the majority of abortions are from lower income folks and minorities, why would the left want to shrink their voting bloc?

To me, it's a decision that should be made by the mother, family, and their doctor. The government just needs to butt out. I get the religion argument of many, but our government should not be forcing religious views and stances on anyone.

1. Planned Parenthood loves it. So do Democrats in Virginia.

(03-06-2020 01:01 PM)natibeast21 Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 09:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2020 05:53 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  You do know the SCOTUS also ruled slavery was fine.

So... we're all OK with the court revisiting prior decisions, right?

As long as it's in the course of another case...of course...that's one of their purposes. But no, they don't just decide to go back and revisit a decision...and I assume that's not what you were saying.

Maybe "revisit" was ambiguous. But you seem to understand my point.

The SCOTUS is not infallible. The justices do make mistakes. For example, saying that it's OK to kill babies was a mistake. It needs to be rectified.

Well, it wasn't "killing babies" until the right wing political machine took it over.

Do you think the reason the left is pro abortion is because "women's body/health/rights" or "population control"..?

I'm talking about the real decision maker's on the left. Not the general public.

How about because they make money selling fetal tissue (ie, baby parts). You'd be surprised who is involved at high levels.

(03-06-2020 01:42 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 01:01 PM)natibeast21 Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 09:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  As long as it's in the course of another case...of course...that's one of their purposes. But no, they don't just decide to go back and revisit a decision...and I assume that's not what you were saying.

Maybe "revisit" was ambiguous. But you seem to understand my point.

The SCOTUS is not infallible. The justices do make mistakes. For example, saying that it's OK to kill babies was a mistake. It needs to be rectified.

Well, it wasn't "killing babies" until the right wing political machine took it over.

Do you think the reason the left is pro abortion is because "women's body/health/rights" or "population control"..?

I'm talking about the real decision maker's on the left. Not the general public.

How about because they make money selling fetal tissue (ie, baby parts). You'd be surprised who is involved at high levels.

RE DICK U LOUS!

Quote:They also inspired a wave of investigations. After the videos' release last summer, a number of states quickly decided to look into whether the tissue sale the videos purported to show was happening within their borders.

Despite all the worry, state investigations have yet to find any evidence that Planned Parenthood was selling or profiting off fetal tissue. Twelve states have completed investigations into Planned Parenthood following the videos' release, according to the organization.

Planned Parenthood Investigations Find No Fetal Tissue Sales

(03-06-2020 01:39 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 09:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-05-2020 05:53 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  You do know the SCOTUS also ruled slavery was fine.

So... we're all OK with the court revisiting prior decisions, right?

As long as it's in the course of another case...of course...that's one of their purposes. But no, they don't just decide to go back and revisit a decision...and I assume that's not what you were saying.

Maybe "revisit" was ambiguous. But you seem to understand my point.

The SCOTUS is not infallible. The justices do make mistakes. For example, saying that it's OK to kill babies was a mistake. It needs to be rectified.

Well, it wasn't "killing babies" until the right wing political machine took it over.

Well, they weren't advocating doing them at 9 months gestation or "letting it die on the table" if it survived outside the womb either........

MO RON IC!

Quote:Most legal experts we contacted agreed with this much of the Democrats’ argument: Killing a baby after birth is already against the law.

"Actively killing an infant born alive is a crime," said Lois Shepherd, a professor of law and biomedical ethics at the University of Virginia and author of the books Rationing Health Care at the End of Life and If That Ever Happens to Me: Making Life and Death Decisions After Terri Schiavo. "Under the law, living infants are just like other living people. They are children. Children are people."

Legal experts pointed to several specific laws relevant to newborns

Read more here: "The Democrat(ic) position on abortion is now so extreme that they don’t mind executing babies AFTER birth."

(03-06-2020 02:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 01:42 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 01:01 PM)natibeast21 Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2020 11:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  Maybe "revisit" was ambiguous. But you seem to understand my point.

The SCOTUS is not infallible. The justices do make mistakes. For example, saying that it's OK to kill babies was a mistake. It needs to be rectified.

Well, it wasn't "killing babies" until the right wing political machine took it over.

Do you think the reason the left is pro abortion is because "women's body/health/rights" or "population control"..?

I'm talking about the real decision maker's on the left. Not the general public.

How about because they make money selling fetal tissue (ie, baby parts). You'd be surprised who is involved at high levels.

RE DICK U LOUS!

Quote:They also inspired a wave of investigations. After the videos' release last summer, a number of states quickly decided to look into whether the tissue sale the videos purported to show was happening within their borders.

Despite all the worry, state investigations have yet to find any evidence that Planned Parenthood was selling or profiting off fetal tissue. Twelve states have completed investigations into Planned Parenthood following the videos' release, according to the organization.

Planned Parenthood Investigations Find No Fetal Tissue Sales

Did you report the Project Veritas video, where it showed they were engaged in selling baby parts? I mean, you had to go back to 2015 to find something that said it didnt happen. We have conclusive proof on video that this was happening AFTER those so-called investigations in your link.

Glad to see Bloomberg is stil paying you though to type up nonsense though.

Mollie eviscerates the dishonest media on Schumer's dog whistles to the nutcases.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/03/06/sto...s-threats/

"When Democratic leader Sen. Chuck Schumer threatened two sitting Supreme Court justices this week, some reporters and other Democratic politicians attempted to downplay his unprecedented attack by falsely claiming he was echoing what Justice Brett Kavanaugh had said during his contentious confirmation hearing.

Only the completely ignorant or willfully duplicitous person could make such a comparison...."

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/48...the-courts

Turley attacks Democrats for judiciary threats and media for ignoring them.

"...During the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, Whitehouse declared that he uncovered an unmistakable “pattern evidence of bias” by the “Roberts Five.” The five conservative justices often vote as a bloc, he said, and “no Democratic appointee joins them.” He blissfully ignored that on the other side of the divide are four liberal justices who vote as a bloc too.

Sadly, none of this appears to warrant more media coverage or analysis. It appears from that lack of coverage that there is less of a Brooklyn than of a Democratic license when it comes to attacks on the judiciary."