https://twitter.com/frankrunyeon/status/...8303972356

ON PINS & NEEDLES

https://twitter.com/TatianaSiegel27/stat...2555296771

SPLITSVILLE

Not guilty on 3 of the 5 counts. Surprising.

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/...9222074369

GAL PAL

(02-24-2020 11:52 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  Not guilty on 3 of the 5 counts. Surprising.

True, but that still gets him 5 to 20 years. And he's 67.

Plus, he is about to be extradited to LA for another trial.

(02-24-2020 12:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 11:52 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  Not guilty on 3 of the 5 counts. Surprising.

True, but that still gets him 5 to 20 years. And he's 67.

Plus, he is about to be extradited to LA for another trial.

It would've been cheaper for him to hire prostitutes. Prolong misery for a few minutes of pleasure.

What a pendejo.

(02-24-2020 03:08 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 12:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 11:52 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  Not guilty on 3 of the 5 counts. Surprising.

True, but that still gets him 5 to 20 years. And he's 67.

Plus, he is about to be extradited to LA for another trial.

It would've been cheaper for him to hire prostitutes. Prolong misery for a few minutes of pleasure.

What a pendejo.

Agreed... but with a perp like Weinstein it wasn’t about the pleasure it was about control. It’s almost laughable to see that fat SOB pushing his walker to and from the courtroom. If he had violated my daughter he would be answering to me, not the court. Weinstein is a real POS.

Like the use of a walker, this is a ploy. He'll get to stay in the hospital which is far better than general population. After that, he can go cry that he needs to be moved to house arrest because he's sick.

We were all sitting around the smoke shop right before the verdict was announced and taking bets on how long it would take him to go to the hospital if he was found guilty.

(02-25-2020 12:59 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 03:08 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 12:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 11:52 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  Not guilty on 3 of the 5 counts. Surprising.

True, but that still gets him 5 to 20 years. And he's 67.

Plus, he is about to be extradited to LA for another trial.

It would've been cheaper for him to hire prostitutes. Prolong misery for a few minutes of pleasure.

What a pendejo.

Agreed... but with a perp like Weinstein it wasn’t about the pleasure it was about control. It’s almost laughable to see that fat SOB pushing his walker to and from the courtroom. If he had violated my daughter he would be answering to me, not the court. Weinstein is a real POS.

Lets be completely honest here...

unless your daughter was a prostitute willing to have sex with the man in exchange for roles in movies or his connection. There's a very good chance he wouldnt have touched her.

Scum bag or not as men we all should be afraid of this verdict. In my opinion you dont get to cry rape when you have a relationship with the man...before and even after, you cry rape, years later.

This woman wasnt f'ing raped. She opened her legs screwed him many many times. Then when it benefited her with the metoo movement and she no longer was getting roles from the man. Cried rape....after sending hundreds of emails/text/letters calling him her friend and lover.

To me that sounds just like a prostitute, or call girl, which is the same milking it to get paid. There's many scumbags out there and each of us know a few...

still dont mean they are rapist and the law knows no different from the scumbags than than the man next door being called a rapist because it now benefited someone. Or they are angry because they got dumped. It's hard for me to look at this through the eyes...the scumbag got what he deserved. This was not about the law. It was about the scumbag and next time, a young man might not be a scumbag but still be found guilty because a girl regretted it, changed her mind, wanted to get even, wanted something else.

(02-26-2020 12:25 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(02-25-2020 12:59 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 03:08 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 12:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(02-24-2020 11:52 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  Not guilty on 3 of the 5 counts. Surprising.

True, but that still gets him 5 to 20 years. And he's 67.

Plus, he is about to be extradited to LA for another trial.

It would've been cheaper for him to hire prostitutes. Prolong misery for a few minutes of pleasure.

What a pendejo.

Agreed... but with a perp like Weinstein it wasn’t about the pleasure it was about control. It’s almost laughable to see that fat SOB pushing his walker to and from the courtroom. If he had violated my daughter he would be answering to me, not the court. Weinstein is a real POS.

Lets be completely honest here...

unless your daughter was a prostitute willing to have sex with the man in exchange for roles in movies or his connection. There's a very good chance he wouldnt have touched her.

Scum bag or not as men we all should be afraid of this verdict. In my opinion you dont get to cry rape when you have a relationship with the man...before and even after, you cry rape, years later.

This woman wasnt f'ing raped. She opened her legs screwed him many many times. Then when it benefited her with the metoo movement and she no longer was getting roles from the man. Cried rape....after sending hundreds of emails/text/letters calling him her friend and lover.

To me that sounds just like a prostitute, or call girl, which is the same milking it to get paid. There's many scumbags out there and each of us know a few...

still dont mean they are rapist and the law knows no different from the scumbags than than the man next door being called a rapist because it now benefited someone. Or they are angry because they got dumped. It's hard for me to look at this through the eyes...the scumbag got what he deserved. This was not about the law. It was about the scumbag and next time, a young man might not be a scumbag but still be found guilty because a girl regretted it, changed her mind, wanted to get even, wanted something else.

The key word Jim used there is "control".

The problem is that he was using his influence (which is control) to screw these women. Even thought it maybe was "consensual" in that the woman agreed to do whatever they did with him, he was using control and influence to get it. It is highly unlikely that any of the women would have actually screwed this pig if he looked exactly the same but was some "Regular Joe" instead.

The same however could be true for any of these women as well....... Dare I say it, unless this a-hole did hold them down and forcefully molest them against their will, they were willfully taking part in one of the oldest games in the book.....

QUID PRO QUO

If it was truly that situation of QPQ, as physically repugnant as Harvey is, these women all had the choice to say no.

We know hes gonna kill himself and it will be real because he doesn't have the dirt on the truly powerful like Epstein

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I came here to see how people were fairing with the virus news and decided to open this thread. Bad idea. I forgot my protective gear.

So I'm outta this area with one last post...lol.

In conclusion, gentlemen of the jury, I'm not sure how anyone could interpret this to be consensual.

Testimony from Anabella Sciorra
https://pagesix.com/2020/01/23/annabella...weinstein/

https://variety.com/2020/biz/news/annabe...203476931/

In emotional and at times harrowing testimony, the Brooklyn-born “Sopranos” actress told the court that Weinstein forced his way into her Manhattan apartment when she was a rising star more than two decades ago and then forced himself on her — crassly congratulating himself for pulling out before his orgasm with the boast, “I have perfect timing.”


Weinstein grabbed Sciorra around her collar above her chest, the actor testified, and he shoved her onto the bed. She said she was wearing a nightgown and did not have underwear on, since prior to his unexpected arrival, she had gotten ready to go to bed in the comfort of her own home. “I was trying to get him off of me, I was punching him, I was kicking him,” she said. “I was just trying to get him away from me…He put my hands over my head to put them back and he got on top of me and he raped me.”

And when she privately confronted Weinstein about the alleged assault at a public event about a month later, Sciorra said, the Hollywood heavyweight callously responded, “That’s what all the nice Catholic girls say.”

“And then he leaned into me and warned, ‘This remains between you and I,’ ” she testified. “It was very menacing. His eyes were black and I thought he was going to hit me right there.”