Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
News Media Scramble to Fact Check Whether There Were Actual Crickets on Debate Stage
Author Message
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 41,336
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 2371
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #1
Media Scramble to Fact Check Whether There Were Actual Crickets on Debate Stage






Quote:Media figures rushed to fact check a humorous, clearly edited video released by Michael Bloomberg's campaign on Thursday, with one CNN reporter comparing it to a so-called deepfake.

In the video, Bloomberg's question at Wednesday's Democratic debate about whether any other candidates had started their own business is met with 20 seconds of blank stares, complete with cricket noises, the classic sound effect during an awkward silence. In reality, the silence lasted a beat before Bloomberg moved on.

This drew the attention of reporters like CNN's Dana Bash.

"There is a video that his campaign tweeted this morning that didn't happen. It is a deceptively edited video," Bash said, before playing the clip.

While she acknowledged the campaign had pointed out it was meant to be humorous, she said it's an era where "we are so concerned about things that are doctored, deepfakes on the internet."

"Deepfakes" refer to a form of media where an existing image or video is replaced with another person's face or voice.

"It makes it harder to take the arguments that he's making seriously when he does something like this," Bash said of Bloomberg.

New York Times reporter Azi Paybarah compared it to a similarly criticized video put out by President Donald Trump's campaign after the State of the Union, where House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) was depicted tearing up his speech during its more poignant moments. Pelosi did rip up the speech, but only after Trump concluded.

Business Insider wrote Bloomberg's video was "incredibly misleading," and liberal outlet Talking Points Memo called it "doctored." NBC News fact checked the video, with reporter Maura Barrett calling it "manipulated."

A campaign spokesman was eventually forced to release a statement that "there were obviously no crickets on the debate stage."



The media's relationship with edited videos is complicated. While ones like Trump sharing a montage of Pelosi tripping over her words at a press conference were met with condemnation, celebrated journalist Katie Couric suffered no professional consequences when her 2016 documentary edited in nine seconds of silence to make gun-rights supporters look dumbstruck by one of her questions.

The outraged coverage of Bloomberg's video continued on Friday.

NBC News "dystopia beat" reporter Ben Collins told MSNBC's Stephanie Ruhle that "without the crickets," people could take such a clip seriously.

"That's how disinformation sort of steamrolls, and if nobody is going to stop it, it could change narratives," he said. "It [missing word here–could?] change the outcome of an election. We've been there before."



The Washington Post Fact-Checker gave the ad "Four Pinocchios," its harshest rating for a political lie. It said it was taking a "tough line on manipulated campaign videos."

"Political ads can be fun and entertaining, but they shouldn’t be misleading," the Post wrote. "Anyone who had not seen the debate could have been easily misled into thinking the other candidates stood there in stunned silence for nearly half a minute."

In a 1,159-word explainer, Vox conceded "stretching the truth is a normal practice in politics" but said Democrats have to be wary about what is released in their name in an era of disinformation.

Emerson Brooking, "a disinformation expert" at the Atlantic Council, told Vox the ad was "deceptive and misleading." He scolded the Bloomberg team for not adding a disclosure it was produced by his campaign, although the video being shared was tweeted from Bloomberg's official account.

Link

Media thinks you can’t tell it’s an ad.

Related:

Check out usmbackers thread: Twitter is suspending 70 pro-Bloomberg accounts, citing ‘platform manipulation’


Also:



With democrats it’s all about controlling the narrative.
02-22-2020 02:20 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.