UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,354
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
|
01-27-2020 01:12 PM |
|
gdunn
Repping E-Gang Colors
Posts: 30,241
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2432
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-27-2020 01:09 PM)JDTulane Wrote: (01-27-2020 01:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 09:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-24-2020 04:54 PM)TripleA Wrote: Just for a frame of reference and context, Yuvanovich wasn't removed from her post until 14 months after Trump's comments, lol.
Doesn't exactly help his cause...the removal was then right around the time when this whole scheme was set into full motion. Oops.
Frankly, I would have fired her for insubordination as soon as I learned of any negative remarks that she made. An ambassador's job is to represent the USA and our government in the most positive manner possible. By all accounts I've seen, she was not doing that. She serves at the pleasure of the president. He should have canned her long before he did.
I guess we stopped holding Presidents to that standard eons ago
Roughly around 2008..
|
|
01-27-2020 01:44 PM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 969
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-27-2020 01:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 09:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-24-2020 04:54 PM)TripleA Wrote: Just for a frame of reference and context, Yuvanovich wasn't removed from her post until 14 months after Trump's comments, lol.
Doesn't exactly help his cause...the removal was then right around the time when this whole scheme was set into full motion. Oops.
Frankly, I would have fired her for insubordination as soon as I learned of any negative remarks that she made. An ambassador's job is to represent the USA and our government in the most positive manner possible. By all accounts I've seen, she was not doing that. She serves at the pleasure of the president. He should have canned her long before he did.
Other than the words of the two guys trump supposedly does not know, Lev and Igor, what negative remarks did she make?
By all accounts, she was a dedicated public servant and supporter of this country for years.
|
|
01-27-2020 02:13 PM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach
Posts: 80,655
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3192
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-27-2020 02:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-27-2020 01:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 09:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-24-2020 04:54 PM)TripleA Wrote: Just for a frame of reference and context, Yuvanovich wasn't removed from her post until 14 months after Trump's comments, lol.
Doesn't exactly help his cause...the removal was then right around the time when this whole scheme was set into full motion. Oops.
Frankly, I would have fired her for insubordination as soon as I learned of any negative remarks that she made. An ambassador's job is to represent the USA and our government in the most positive manner possible. By all accounts I've seen, she was not doing that. She serves at the pleasure of the president. He should have canned her long before he did.
Other than the words of the two guys trump supposedly does not know, Lev and Igor, what negative remarks did she make?
By all accounts, she was a dedicated public servant and supporter of this country for years.
She was apparently a Clinton appointee and a big Obama supporter who said some negative things about Trump. That pretty much disqualifies her to be an ambassador for the Trump administration.
I'm sorry, but "dedicated public servant" is an oxymoron.
|
|
01-28-2020 01:28 AM |
|
JMUDunk
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud
Posts: 29,499
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 1721
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
|
"Take Her Out"
(01-27-2020 02:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-27-2020 01:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 09:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-24-2020 04:54 PM)TripleA Wrote: Just for a frame of reference and context, Yuvanovich wasn't removed from her post until 14 months after Trump's comments, lol.
Doesn't exactly help his cause...the removal was then right around the time when this whole scheme was set into full motion. Oops.
Frankly, I would have fired her for insubordination as soon as I learned of any negative remarks that she made. An ambassador's job is to represent the USA and our government in the most positive manner possible. By all accounts I've seen, she was not doing that. She serves at the pleasure of the president. He should have canned her long before he did.
Other than the words of the two guys trump supposedly does not know, Lev and Igor, what negative remarks did she make?
By all accounts, she was a dedicated public servant and supporter of this country for years.
So?
These aren’t lifetime entitlement appointments.
Talk schit about your boss and see how long you last.
This is ENTIRELY the problem with the marbled floor, baseline budgeting, “career” a-holes that infest our gubment from top to bottom.
Show me another baby blue, short sleeve nipple shirt with the red knit tie jerk-off and I’ll show you the next f#%^’er to get a black eye to match.
This is why you guys don’t get it. When is enough, enough?
|
|
01-28-2020 05:03 AM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 969
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-28-2020 01:28 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 02:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-27-2020 01:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 09:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-24-2020 04:54 PM)TripleA Wrote: Just for a frame of reference and context, Yuvanovich wasn't removed from her post until 14 months after Trump's comments, lol.
Doesn't exactly help his cause...the removal was then right around the time when this whole scheme was set into full motion. Oops.
Frankly, I would have fired her for insubordination as soon as I learned of any negative remarks that she made. An ambassador's job is to represent the USA and our government in the most positive manner possible. By all accounts I've seen, she was not doing that. She serves at the pleasure of the president. He should have canned her long before he did.
Other than the words of the two guys trump supposedly does not know, Lev and Igor, what negative remarks did she make?
By all accounts, she was a dedicated public servant and supporter of this country for years.
She was apparently a Clinton appointee and a big Obama supporter who said some negative things about Trump. That pretty much disqualifies her to be an ambassador for the Trump administration.
I'm sorry, but "dedicated public servant" is an oxymoron.
Yet the orange idiot kept her on for months. Sad.
And FTR - She worked under W as well.
|
|
01-28-2020 09:53 AM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach
Posts: 80,655
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3192
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-28-2020 09:53 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 01:28 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 02:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-27-2020 01:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 09:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: Doesn't exactly help his cause...the removal was then right around the time when this whole scheme was set into full motion. Oops.
Frankly, I would have fired her for insubordination as soon as I learned of any negative remarks that she made. An ambassador's job is to represent the USA and our government in the most positive manner possible. By all accounts I've seen, she was not doing that. She serves at the pleasure of the president. He should have canned her long before he did.
Other than the words of the two guys trump [sic] supposedly does not know, Lev and Igor, what negative remarks did she make?
By all accounts, she was a dedicated public servant and supporter of this country for years.
She was apparently a Clinton appointee and a big Obama supporter who said some negative things about Trump. That pretty much disqualifies her to be an ambassador for the Trump administration.
I'm sorry, but "dedicated public servant" is an oxymoron.
Yet the orange idiot kept her on for months. Sad.
Without knowing a lot of things that I can never know, I can't evaluate it. But on the surface it seems strange. As I said before, she'd have long been fired if I were running things.
Quote:And FTR - She worked under W as well.
I am under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that she did not make similarly disparaging remarks about GWB (why not, I'm not sure, but I've seen no indication that she did).
Regardless, an ambassador serves at the pleasure of the president. If he's not pleased, for whatever reason or no reason at all, he has every right to fire her.
|
|
01-28-2020 10:13 AM |
|
UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,354
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-28-2020 10:13 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-28-2020 09:53 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 01:28 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 02:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-27-2020 01:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: Frankly, I would have fired her for insubordination as soon as I learned of any negative remarks that she made. An ambassador's job is to represent the USA and our government in the most positive manner possible. By all accounts I've seen, she was not doing that. She serves at the pleasure of the president. He should have canned her long before he did.
Other than the words of the two guys trump [sic] supposedly does not know, Lev and Igor, what negative remarks did she make?
By all accounts, she was a dedicated public servant and supporter of this country for years.
She was apparently a Clinton appointee and a big Obama supporter who said some negative things about Trump. That pretty much disqualifies her to be an ambassador for the Trump administration.
I'm sorry, but "dedicated public servant" is an oxymoron.
Yet the orange idiot kept her on for months. Sad.
Without knowing a lot of things that I can never know, I can't evaluate it. But on the surface it seems strange. As I said before, she'd have long been fired if I were running things.
Quote:And FTR - She worked under W as well.
I am under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that she did not make similarly disparaging remarks about GWB (why not, I'm not sure, but I've seen no indication that she did).
Regardless, an ambassador serves at the pleasure of the president. If he's not pleased, for whatever reason or no reason at all, he has every right to fire her.
Gotta love that small detail that some people keep forgetting.
|
|
01-28-2020 10:30 AM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 969
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-28-2020 10:13 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-28-2020 09:53 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 01:28 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 02:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-27-2020 01:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: Frankly, I would have fired her for insubordination as soon as I learned of any negative remarks that she made. An ambassador's job is to represent the USA and our government in the most positive manner possible. By all accounts I've seen, she was not doing that. She serves at the pleasure of the president. He should have canned her long before he did.
Other than the words of the two guys trump [sic] supposedly does not know, Lev and Igor, what negative remarks did she make?
By all accounts, she was a dedicated public servant and supporter of this country for years.
She was apparently a Clinton appointee and a big Obama supporter who said some negative things about Trump. That pretty much disqualifies her to be an ambassador for the Trump administration.
I'm sorry, but "dedicated public servant" is an oxymoron.
Yet the orange idiot kept her on for months. Sad.
Without knowing a lot of things that I can never know, I can't evaluate it. But on the surface it seems strange. As I said before, she'd have long been fired if I were running things.
Quote:And FTR - She worked under W as well.
I am under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that she did not make similarly disparaging remarks about GWB (why not, I'm not sure, but I've seen no indication that she did).
Regardless, an ambassador serves at the pleasure of the president. If he's not pleased, for whatever reason or no reason at all, he has every right to fire her.
What remarks? And if you think the actions of W warrant anywhere near the actions of trump warrant, I have to seriously question your mental capacity.
|
|
01-28-2020 11:36 AM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 969
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-28-2020 10:30 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (01-28-2020 10:13 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-28-2020 09:53 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 01:28 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-27-2020 02:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: Other than the words of the two guys trump [sic] supposedly does not know, Lev and Igor, what negative remarks did she make?
By all accounts, she was a dedicated public servant and supporter of this country for years.
She was apparently a Clinton appointee and a big Obama supporter who said some negative things about Trump. That pretty much disqualifies her to be an ambassador for the Trump administration.
I'm sorry, but "dedicated public servant" is an oxymoron.
Yet the orange idiot kept her on for months. Sad.
Without knowing a lot of things that I can never know, I can't evaluate it. But on the surface it seems strange. As I said before, she'd have long been fired if I were running things.
Quote:And FTR - She worked under W as well.
I am under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that she did not make similarly disparaging remarks about GWB (why not, I'm not sure, but I've seen no indication that she did).
Regardless, an ambassador serves at the pleasure of the president. If he's not pleased, for whatever reason or no reason at all, he has every right to fire her.
Gotta love that small detail that some people keep forgetting.
Nobody forgets that. But he didn't just "fire" her in the traditional sense. Why? Makes no sense...unless something else was at play.
|
|
01-28-2020 11:37 AM |
|
UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,354
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-28-2020 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 10:30 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (01-28-2020 10:13 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-28-2020 09:53 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 01:28 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: She was apparently a Clinton appointee and a big Obama supporter who said some negative things about Trump. That pretty much disqualifies her to be an ambassador for the Trump administration.
I'm sorry, but "dedicated public servant" is an oxymoron.
Yet the orange idiot kept her on for months. Sad.
Without knowing a lot of things that I can never know, I can't evaluate it. But on the surface it seems strange. As I said before, she'd have long been fired if I were running things.
Quote:And FTR - She worked under W as well.
I am under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that she did not make similarly disparaging remarks about GWB (why not, I'm not sure, but I've seen no indication that she did).
Regardless, an ambassador serves at the pleasure of the president. If he's not pleased, for whatever reason or no reason at all, he has every right to fire her.
Gotta love that small detail that some people keep forgetting.
Nobody forgets that. But he didn't just "fire" her in the traditional sense. Why? Makes no sense...unless something else was at play.
Oh tell us, what is the traditional way to fire an ambassador?
|
|
01-28-2020 11:40 AM |
|
Redwingtom
Progressive filth
Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 969
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-28-2020 11:40 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (01-28-2020 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 10:30 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (01-28-2020 10:13 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (01-28-2020 09:53 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: Yet the orange idiot kept her on for months. Sad.
Without knowing a lot of things that I can never know, I can't evaluate it. But on the surface it seems strange. As I said before, she'd have long been fired if I were running things.
Quote:And FTR - She worked under W as well.
I am under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that she did not make similarly disparaging remarks about GWB (why not, I'm not sure, but I've seen no indication that she did).
Regardless, an ambassador serves at the pleasure of the president. If he's not pleased, for whatever reason or no reason at all, he has every right to fire her.
Gotta love that small detail that some people keep forgetting.
Nobody forgets that. But he didn't just "fire" her in the traditional sense. Why? Makes no sense...unless something else was at play.
Oh tell us, what is the traditional way to fire an ambassador?
Tell her she's being replaced. End of story.
"She's going to go through some things." ~ Orange Idiot
|
|
01-28-2020 11:42 AM |
|
UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,354
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
RE: "Take Her Out"
(01-28-2020 11:42 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 11:40 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (01-28-2020 11:37 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (01-28-2020 10:30 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (01-28-2020 10:13 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: Without knowing a lot of things that I can never know, I can't evaluate it. But on the surface it seems strange. As I said before, she'd have long been fired if I were running things.
I am under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that she did not make similarly disparaging remarks about GWB (why not, I'm not sure, but I've seen no indication that she did).
Regardless, an ambassador serves at the pleasure of the president. If he's not pleased, for whatever reason or no reason at all, he has every right to fire her.
Gotta love that small detail that some people keep forgetting.
Nobody forgets that. But he didn't just "fire" her in the traditional sense. Why? Makes no sense...unless something else was at play.
Oh tell us, what is the traditional way to fire an ambassador?
Tell her she's being replaced. End of story.
"She's going to go through some things." ~ Orange Idiot
ahhh, I see you have never worked in HR... nice armchair quarterbacking you got there.
|
|
01-28-2020 12:12 PM |
|