(01-10-2020 03:38 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:36 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.

And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

No you don't and you wouldn't give a s hit either way. The only tap dancing is coming from those fckin losers on Team Treason trying to justify how killing one of the world's worst terrorists is a bad thing. Stop rolling their balls in your mouth and think for yourself and maybe put America first every once in a while.

Sorry, too busy thinking about my step son who will be deployed for the next 9 months next door to the middle east, to entertain your fantasies about sucking balls.

Tom this is about the 2nd or 3rd time you've invoked this on a thread about this dead POS... Let me clue you in on something, nobody joins the military hoping and thinking they won't be deployed. Your step son is old enough to know what he got into and maybe you need to man up and know too.

I'll pray for him. But if you get mad at the President for deploying troops when our embassies are being attacked by terrorists or by wars started by previous administrations are still ongoing, maybe the anger needs to be directed at the person who knew what they were signing up for and not turned towards someone in DC. Hate to break it to you, there wasn't a break in deployments or war from 2008 to 2016.

Maybe you need to take time off and re-evaluate your hatred for a person because not everything is Trump's fault and the world isn't perfect.

(01-10-2020 03:38 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:36 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.

And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

No you don't and you wouldn't give a s hit either way. The only tap dancing is coming from those fckin losers on Team Treason trying to justify how killing one of the world's worst terrorists is a bad thing. Stop rolling their balls in your mouth and think for yourself and maybe put America first every once in a while.

Sorry, too busy thinking about my step son who will be deployed for the next 9 months next door to the middle east, to entertain your fantasies about sucking balls.

Congrats your step son is a bigger man than your pussyass.

(01-10-2020 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:25 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.
And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

this news media can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.
Most liberals never heard or understood the story of the boy who cried wolf.

And that has exactly what to do with the administration not providing congress with the proper reasoning?
So you'd trust this if it were HRC as president and her administration providing 3 or 4 different reasons with no evidence to support it?
Please.

You mean, like a video?

Bottom line, every administration has lied to protect whatever. They will keep doing it.

(01-10-2020 03:59 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:38 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:36 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.

And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

No you don't and you wouldn't give a s hit either way. The only tap dancing is coming from those fckin losers on Team Treason trying to justify how killing one of the world's worst terrorists is a bad thing. Stop rolling their balls in your mouth and think for yourself and maybe put America first every once in a while.

Sorry, too busy thinking about my step son who will be deployed for the next 9 months next door to the middle east, to entertain your fantasies about sucking balls.

Congrats your step son is a bigger man than your pussyass.

Stay classy.

And to the slumlord's head I'm living in rent free, my step son got his deployment orders months ago. And not once did I claim he didn't know what he signed up for, especially since he's already served 6 years. None of that changes the fact that as family members of active servicemen, we all worry. Now piss off...again.

Why you people argue with this leftist amazes me. He and his kind hate this country and they refuse to stand up to other countries that want to attack this country, Instead of peace through strength they believe in kneeling down, begging to have others not to harm us and in the end sending them 150 billion to try and bride them to not harm us. If only Winston Churchill was here to see the panty waist appeasers we have in this country these days. They are just weak, sick people. Those that have laid down their lives to give them their freedom deserve better, but at least they do get better from this President and his supporters.

(01-10-2020 04:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:25 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.
And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

this news media can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.
Most liberals never heard or understood the story of the boy who cried wolf.

And that has exactly what to do with the administration not providing congress with the proper reasoning?
So you'd trust this if it were HRC as president and her administration providing 3 or 4 different reasons with no evidence to support it?
Please.

You mean, like a video?

Bottom line, every administration has lied to protect whatever. They will keep doing it.

Owl, get real. They never blamed the attack solely on the video...this was gone over years ago. And the Rice appearances were all thoroughly gone over as well, she was giving known information at that time.

(01-10-2020 03:11 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  But a question Owl, if we had the opportunity to take out Putin or KJU or Duterte or whoever is currently running Venezuela, or some of the thugs running countries in Africa or any other dictator currently with blood on their hands, should we do that and not worry about any repercussions?

You do realize there is a huge legal difference between a head of state and a general right?

(01-10-2020 04:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 04:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:25 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.
And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

this news media can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.
Most liberals never heard or understood the story of the boy who cried wolf.

And that has exactly what to do with the administration not providing congress with the proper reasoning?
So you'd trust this if it were HRC as president and her administration providing 3 or 4 different reasons with no evidence to support it?
Please.

You mean, like a video?
Bottom line, every administration has lied to protect whatever. They will keep doing it.

Owl, get real. They never blamed the attack solely on the video...this was gone over years ago. And the Rice appearances were all thoroughly gone over as well, she was giving known information at that time.

She was very cleverly scripted to give the total impression that it was a video, but not actually say that in so many words. It was a masterful job of propaganda. And how about the guy who went to prison for the video. That was a pretty effective smokescreen.

(01-10-2020 04:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:59 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:38 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:36 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.

And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

No you don't and you wouldn't give a s hit either way. The only tap dancing is coming from those fckin losers on Team Treason trying to justify how killing one of the world's worst terrorists is a bad thing. Stop rolling their balls in your mouth and think for yourself and maybe put America first every once in a while.

Sorry, too busy thinking about my step son who will be deployed for the next 9 months next door to the middle east, to entertain your fantasies about sucking balls.

Congrats your step son is a bigger man than your pussyass.

Stay classy.

And to the slumlord's head I'm living in rent free, my step son got his deployment orders months ago. And not once did I claim he didn't know what he signed up for, especially since he's already served 6 years. None of that changes the fact that as family members of active servicemen, we all worry. Now piss off...again.

As someone who did serve - eat a dick traitor.

(01-10-2020 04:58 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 04:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:59 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:38 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:36 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  No you don't and you wouldn't give a s hit either way. The only tap dancing is coming from those fckin losers on Team Treason trying to justify how killing one of the world's worst terrorists is a bad thing. Stop rolling their balls in your mouth and think for yourself and maybe put America first every once in a while.

Sorry, too busy thinking about my step son who will be deployed for the next 9 months next door to the middle east, to entertain your fantasies about sucking balls.

Sad to see him ride the coattails of his step son. How pathetic is that?

Congrats your step son is a bigger man than your pussyass.

Stay classy.

And to the slumlord's head I'm living in rent free, my step son got his deployment orders months ago. And not once did I claim he didn't know what he signed up for, especially since he's already served 6 years. None of that changes the fact that as family members of active servicemen, we all worry. Now piss off...again.

As someone who did serve - eat a dick traitor.

(01-10-2020 04:58 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 04:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:59 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:38 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:36 PM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  No you don't and you wouldn't give a s hit either way. The only tap dancing is coming from those fckin losers on Team Treason trying to justify how killing one of the world's worst terrorists is a bad thing. Stop rolling their balls in your mouth and think for yourself and maybe put America first every once in a while.

Sorry, too busy thinking about my step son who will be deployed for the next 9 months next door to the middle east, to entertain your fantasies about sucking balls.

Congrats your step son is a bigger man than your pussyass.

Stay classy.

And to the slumlord's head I'm living in rent free, my step son got his deployment orders months ago. And not once did I claim he didn't know what he signed up for, especially since he's already served 6 years. None of that changes the fact that as family members of active servicemen, we all worry. Now piss off...again.

As someone who did serve - eat a dick traitor.

Sad to see him ride the coattails of his step son. How pathetic is that? I am sure the family members of the American soldiers Soleimani was responsible for killing would really love the way this leftist is ranting and hating on the man that had the person responsible for their love ones death meeting the ending he deserved.

(01-10-2020 04:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:25 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.
And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

this news media can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.
Most liberals never heard or understood the story of the boy who cried wolf.

And that has exactly what to do with the administration not providing congress with the proper reasoning?
So you'd trust this if it were HRC as president and her administration providing 3 or 4 different reasons with no evidence to support it?
Please.

You mean, like a video?

Bottom line, every administration has lied to protect whatever. They will keep doing it.

which was the overall point that exceeded any/all expectations 'why #henceDJT'.....

even you have to chuckle at that one...

ol' boy changed the game.....

(01-10-2020 03:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:58 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The real justification is that he is a target of opportunity and they had the opportunity.

And they've had it before...and they've not made this claim as the reason. At least not yet.

What we've heard so far, with not one shred of proof put forth:
1. There was an imminent threat.
2. There were multiple imminent threats.
3. They were planning to take out our embassy.
4. They took him out because he killed an American.

And I'm sure I'm probably missing a couple others.

Aren’t any of those reason enough?

All these moaners are on a need to know basis, and they don’t need to know.

He said don’t kill any Americans, they killed an American. Now you get dirt nap.

(01-10-2020 03:33 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:16 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:09 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Did the opportunities before involve him NOT being in Iran? Serious question.

I would think so...seems we've been tracking him for years...and trump has been in office for 3 years...so why now again?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...806630001/

I just want congress told the actual reason, it's not that much to ask frankly.

I don't really need to know but I would think it had to do with the recent embassy situation and knowing he was involved, again. His name may have popped back up to the top of the list and he was taken out.

Totally get all that, so why can't they just say that to congress then instead of no consistent message?

Doesn't that give you pause?

Remember the WMD fiasco?

Remember, you guys don't trust the government?

Doesn't really matter to me; however, given the hell the D's have put Trump through since 2016 I'd imagine the admin just didn't want to deal with it. I don't really blame them. Like Trump mentioned in his Ohio rally (the first one I've watched in its entirety, btw) he pointed to that very reason. He was more diplomatic (in his own way of course) by saying by the time Congress would have decided to do anything the moment would be passed and he would have missed the opportunity to take the dude out. Makes sense to me. We ALL know that if he had went to Congress first they would have stonewalled.

No, first thing they would have done is leak it.

(01-10-2020 04:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 04:37 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 03:25 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-10-2020 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Don't know whether I'd call it "ample", but I sure wish they'd at least tell us the real justification for it now instead of the runaround tap dance they're doing. And by us, I'm mostly referring to congress.
And again, FTR, any "hate" is not because of the guy getting dead, it's because this administration can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.

this news media can't seem to be trusted with presenting even a rudimentary fact.
Most liberals never heard or understood the story of the boy who cried wolf.

And that has exactly what to do with the administration not providing congress with the proper reasoning?
So you'd trust this if it were HRC as president and her administration providing 3 or 4 different reasons with no evidence to support it?
Please.

You mean, like a video?

Bottom line, every administration has lied to protect whatever. They will keep doing it.

Owl, get real. They never blamed the attack solely on the video...this was gone over years ago. And the Rice appearances were all thoroughly gone over as well, she was giving known information at that time.

If you were on Trump’s side none of the rest of us would have to post here.
None of what you just said is factual. It’s pure bull chit.