Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
House releases Impeachment report
Author Message
solohawks Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,782
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 810
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
Post: #21
RE: House releases Impeachment report
Once again Dems care ZERO about precedent and the long term consequences of their actions

After they impeach President Trump, I wouldn't be surprised to see impeachment become a normal occurance when the minority party has the House. All Presidents leverage their power to accomplish their goals. The minority party will never like an opposing president's goals thus a flimsy reason for impeachment in a process with ZERO guaranteed minority rights outside of what the majority tolerates.

Congrats Dems
12-05-2019 07:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SoMs Eagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,998
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
Post: #22
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 07:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Once again Dems care ZERO about precedent and the long term consequences of their actions

After they impeach President Trump, I wouldn't be surprised to see impeachment become a normal occurance when the minority party has the House. All Presidents leverage their power to accomplish their goals. The minority party will never like an opposing president's goals thus a flimsy reason for impeachment in a process with ZERO guaranteed minority rights outside of what the majority tolerates.

Congrats Dems

Seems to be a recurring theme with them.
12-05-2019 07:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
shere khan Offline
Southerner
*

Posts: 60,503
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 7458
I Root For: Tulane
Location: Teh transfer portal
Post: #23
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-03-2019 10:27 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 10:15 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 08:30 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 05:00 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  NEWS: Rep. Adam Schiff obtained call records for journalist John Solomon, the president's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, and Rep. Devin Nunes as part of the impeachment inquiry.
See pg. 157 of Democratic impeachment report.
[Image: EK5Fd_iWwAIYnCR?format=jpg&name=small]
https://mobile.twitter.com/IvanPentchouk...7727959040

So, what does this prove?

Is it legal?

If so. Im sure the Senate will then get Schiffs call records from back around July 25th.
And this is when the real fun begins
12-05-2019 07:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Offline
nuts zongo's in the house
*

Posts: 68,369
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 6856
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
Post: #24
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 07:42 AM)shere khan Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 10:27 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 10:15 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 08:30 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 05:00 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  NEWS: Rep. Adam Schiff obtained call records for journalist John Solomon, the president's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, and Rep. Devin Nunes as part of the impeachment inquiry.
See pg. 157 of Democratic impeachment report.
[Image: EK5Fd_iWwAIYnCR?format=jpg&name=small]
https://mobile.twitter.com/IvanPentchouk...7727959040

So, what does this prove?

Is it legal?

If so. Im sure the Senate will then get Schiffs call records from back around July 25th.
And this is when the real fun begins

it's not long before we find out what Pee-loser announces how the house will proceed in a couple of hours....

you know what my 'wish list' consists of....

#SPQR

of course the dems will counter with #Sono Pazzi Questi Romani...

it's definitely getting fonzies now...
12-05-2019 07:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,506
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 968
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #25
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 07:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Once again Dems care ZERO about precedent and the long term consequences of their actions

After they impeach President Trump, I wouldn't be surprised to see impeachment become a normal occurance [sic] when the minority party has the House. All Presidents leverage their power to accomplish their goals. The minority party will never like an opposing president's goals thus a flimsy reason for impeachment in a process with ZERO guaranteed minority rights outside of what the majority tolerates.

Congrats Dems

This is the stupidest argument of them all. Not blaming you specifically for it as it was floated again by the cons yesterday in the hearing.

That being said, I assume you meant to say majority party as the minority party by nature can't have the house as they're the minority. 03-wink
12-05-2019 07:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
solohawks Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,782
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 810
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
Post: #26
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 07:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 07:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Once again Dems care ZERO about precedent and the long term consequences of their actions

After they impeach President Trump, I wouldn't be surprised to see impeachment become a normal occurance [sic] when the minority party has the House. All Presidents leverage their power to accomplish their goals. The minority party will never like an opposing president's goals thus a flimsy reason for impeachment in a process with ZERO guaranteed minority rights outside of what the majority tolerates.

Congrats Dems

This is the stupidest argument of them all. Not blaming you specifically for it as it was floated again by the cons yesterday in the hearing.

That being said, I assume you meant to say majority party as the minority party by nature can't have the house as they're the minority. 03-wink

All the Dems have is the House therfore they like the GOP in 2010 are the minority party. Thanks for trying to be cute

As for long term consequences being "stupid" that's what Harry Reid thought when he eliminated the judicial filibuster. He was wrong and so are you
12-05-2019 08:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SoMs Eagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,998
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
Post: #27
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 08:25 AM)solohawks Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 07:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 07:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Once again Dems care ZERO about precedent and the long term consequences of their actions

After they impeach President Trump, I wouldn't be surprised to see impeachment become a normal occurance [sic] when the minority party has the House. All Presidents leverage their power to accomplish their goals. The minority party will never like an opposing president's goals thus a flimsy reason for impeachment in a process with ZERO guaranteed minority rights outside of what the majority tolerates.

Congrats Dems

This is the stupidest argument of them all. Not blaming you specifically for it as it was floated again by the cons yesterday in the hearing.

That being said, I assume you meant to say majority party as the minority party by nature can't have the house as they're the minority. 03-wink

All the Dems have is the House therfore they like the GOP in 2010 are the minority party. Thanks for trying to be cute

As for long term consequences being "stupid" that's what Harry Reid thought when he eliminated the judicial filibuster. He was wrong and so are you


The problem with these people sitting on the left in these hearings is they are simpletons. They don’t think past the end of their noses. Trump is such a white whale to these idiots they will destroy themselves chasing him. Take the rehearsed ‘Barron’ comments. How stupid are these people to have come up with that. It alone made that screeching lesbo look dumb as a rock. The republicans couldn’t have done a better job of it.
12-05-2019 08:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Offline
nuts zongo's in the house
*

Posts: 68,369
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 6856
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
Post: #28
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 07:54 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 07:42 AM)shere khan Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 10:27 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 10:15 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 08:30 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  So, what does this prove?

Is it legal?

If so. Im sure the Senate will then get Schiffs call records from back around July 25th.
And this is when the real fun begins

it's not long before we find out what Pee-loser announces how the house will proceed in a couple of hours....

you know what my 'wish list' consists of....

#SPQR

of course the dems will counter with #Sono Pazzi Questi Romani...

it's definitely getting fonzies now...


"king" "monarch" "hamilton" .... reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee - Pee-loser

would somebody please get pepe the frog out of her throat....

hey nancy pants.... how did that "checks and balance" and "integrity" play out with, "we won't know what's in it, until its passed."

YES.....to the senate we go.....reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

#ourTurnMothertruckers
(This post was last modified: 12-05-2019 09:10 AM by stinkfist.)
12-05-2019 09:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
solohawks Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,782
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 810
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
Post: #29
RE: House releases Impeachment report
Hearing Pelosi quote founders makes me nauseous.
12-05-2019 09:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
solohawks Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,782
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 810
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
Post: #30
RE: House releases Impeachment report
Hey Red tom, should Schiff have to defend his report to the judiciary committee as they "consider" impeachment
12-05-2019 09:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ECUGrad07 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 12,200
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 1261
I Root For: ECU
Location: Lafayette, LA
Post: #31
RE: House releases Impeachment report
Yeah Schiff ought to go to jail over this.
12-05-2019 09:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,287
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3285
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #32
RE: House releases Impeachment report
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...41888.html

"...Knowing his sentiments, Democrats on the panel had steered clear of Turley, mostly quizzing the three other liberal legal scholars. Noah Feldman of Harvard Law School, Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina School of Law and Pamela Karlan of Stanford Law School all agreed that Trump had committed impeachable offenses.

Only Turley dissented. For that reason, he was shut out of the first 45 minutes of questioning except for one yes-or-no question. When Turley tried to elaborate, the Democratic counsel shut him down.

“You're now well rested,” ranking member Doug Collins told the legal scholar when Republicans finally got their turn to ask questions. Was there anything he would like to respond to from the initial round of inquiries that skipped over him?

“It's a challenge to think of anything I was not able to cover in my robust exchange with majority counsel,” Turley quipped. “But I'd like to try.” And then he held forth, explaining why it would be improper to impeach Trump, a president whose actions he didn’t think were particularly proper....

--If Democrats want to charge Trump with obstruction of justice by refusing to comply with subpoenas, they ought to willingly fight him in court, a legal avenue rightly open to the president: “If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power....""
12-05-2019 09:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,506
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 968
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #33
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 09:17 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Hey Red tom, should Schiff have to defend his report to the judiciary committee as they "consider" impeachment

I don't know what the resolution guiding the proceedings says on that matter, if anything, but I would think some type of representative of his committee should be available to judiciary if warranted. I would think the counsel that represented the D's in the hearings would suffice.
12-05-2019 09:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,506
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 968
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #34
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 09:22 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  Yeah Schiff ought to go to jail over this.

01-wingedeagle
12-05-2019 09:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,506
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 968
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #35
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 09:32 AM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...41888.html

"...Knowing his sentiments, Democrats on the panel had steered clear of Turley, mostly quizzing the three other liberal legal scholars. Noah Feldman of Harvard Law School, Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina School of Law and Pamela Karlan of Stanford Law School all agreed that Trump had committed impeachable offenses.

Only Turley dissented. For that reason, he was shut out of the first 45 minutes of questioning except for one yes-or-no question. When Turley tried to elaborate, the Democratic counsel shut him down.

“You're now well rested,” ranking member Doug Collins told the legal scholar when Republicans finally got their turn to ask questions. Was there anything he would like to respond to from the initial round of inquiries that skipped over him?

“It's a challenge to think of anything I was not able to cover in my robust exchange with majority counsel,” Turley quipped. “But I'd like to try.” And then he held forth, explaining why it would be improper to impeach Trump, a president whose actions he didn’t think were particularly proper....

--If Democrats want to charge Trump with obstruction of justice by refusing to comply with subpoenas, they ought to willingly fight him in court, a legal avenue rightly open to the president: “If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power....""

Elections have consequences. And the 45 minute question session from each side is the same as they did in the first hearings. I watched most of this and I didn't see the GOP asking many questions of the 3 dem witnesses...and they hardly asked Turley much to be honest...they mostly ran on bloviating about nonsensical conspiracy theories and lamenting the process for their whole 5 minutes.

But I do with they would have questioned Turley more. Especially about his change of heart since the last impeachment. Additionally, Turley seemed to say that waiting for the courts to clear the fact witnesses and documents the White House is holding seemed to be the prudent direction, so I wish they would have asked him how long that would take and whether it made sense as an election is coming up.
(This post was last modified: 12-05-2019 09:57 AM by Redwingtom.)
12-05-2019 09:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
solohawks Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,782
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 810
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
Post: #36
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 09:17 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Hey Red tom, should Schiff have to defend his report to the judiciary committee as they "consider" impeachment

I don't know what the resolution guiding the proceedings says on that matter, if anything, but I would think some type of representative of his committee should be available to judiciary if warranted. I would think the counsel that represented the D's in the hearings would suffice.

I would disagree. Schiff's report. He should defend it
12-05-2019 10:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AdoptedMonarch Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,448
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1943
I Root For: Old Dominion
Location: Norfolk, Va.
Post: #37
RE: House releases Impeachment report
My e-mail this morning to my Congressional Representative (term-limits poster-child, Bobby Scott):



Rep. Scott:

I can't imagine that you care, but I'll waste some of my time anyway.

As someone who used to work the polls for you, back when you first ran for your current office, I want you to know that the Democrat-led impeachment effort has accomplished the near-impossible: turning me into a defender of President Trump. What are you folks thinking????
12-05-2019 11:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,506
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 968
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #38
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 09:55 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 09:32 AM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articl...41888.html

"...Knowing his sentiments, Democrats on the panel had steered clear of Turley, mostly quizzing the three other liberal legal scholars. Noah Feldman of Harvard Law School, Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina School of Law and Pamela Karlan of Stanford Law School all agreed that Trump had committed impeachable offenses.

Only Turley dissented. For that reason, he was shut out of the first 45 minutes of questioning except for one yes-or-no question. When Turley tried to elaborate, the Democratic counsel shut him down.

“You're now well rested,” ranking member Doug Collins told the legal scholar when Republicans finally got their turn to ask questions. Was there anything he would like to respond to from the initial round of inquiries that skipped over him?

“It's a challenge to think of anything I was not able to cover in my robust exchange with majority counsel,” Turley quipped. “But I'd like to try.” And then he held forth, explaining why it would be improper to impeach Trump, a president whose actions he didn’t think were particularly proper....

--If Democrats want to charge Trump with obstruction of justice by refusing to comply with subpoenas, they ought to willingly fight him in court, a legal avenue rightly open to the president: “If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power....""

Elections have consequences. And the 45 minute question session from each side is the same as they did in the first hearings. I watched most of this and I didn't see the GOP asking many questions of the 3 dem witnesses...and they hardly asked Turley much to be honest...they mostly ran on bloviating about nonsensical conspiracy theories and lamenting the process for their whole 5 minutes.

But I do with they would have questioned Turley more. Especially about his change of heart since the last impeachment. Additionally, Turley seemed to say that waiting for the courts to clear the fact witnesses and documents the White House is holding seemed to be the prudent direction, so I wish they would have asked him how long that would take and whether it made sense as an election is coming up.

Pretty much my feelings as well.


(This post was last modified: 12-05-2019 11:36 AM by Redwingtom.)
12-05-2019 11:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lush Offline
go to hell and get a job
*

Posts: 16,204
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 395
I Root For: the user
Location: sovereign ludditia
Post: #39
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-05-2019 08:33 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 08:25 AM)solohawks Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 07:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-05-2019 07:03 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Once again Dems care ZERO about precedent and the long term consequences of their actions

After they impeach President Trump, I wouldn't be surprised to see impeachment become a normal occurance [sic] when the minority party has the House. All Presidents leverage their power to accomplish their goals. The minority party will never like an opposing president's goals thus a flimsy reason for impeachment in a process with ZERO guaranteed minority rights outside of what the majority tolerates.

Congrats Dems

This is the stupidest argument of them all. Not blaming you specifically for it as it was floated again by the cons yesterday in the hearing.

That being said, I assume you meant to say majority party as the minority party by nature can't have the house as they're the minority. 03-wink

All the Dems have is the House therfore they like the GOP in 2010 are the minority party. Thanks for trying to be cute

As for long term consequences being "stupid" that's what Harry Reid thought when he eliminated the judicial filibuster. He was wrong and so are you


The problem with these people sitting on the left in these hearings is they are simpletons. They don’t think past the end of their noses. Trump is such a white whale to these idiots they will destroy themselves chasing him. Take the rehearsed ‘Barron’ comments. How stupid are these people to have come up with that. It alone made that screeching lesbo look dumb as a rock. The republicans couldn’t have done a better job of it.

how did that panel or whatever they're called get selected? i'm beyond shocked that a grouping of academics is so incredibly biased. trump can't get a fair shake and it doesn't even matter. i guess only don's can be teflon

welp. the left's gonna have five more years of churning mountains out of molehills. at what point does donald just ignore it? i mean, not call schiff a complete waste of a human or whatever. not that i mind it or expect him to, or even disagree with it, i just think it'd piss em off more if he didn't acknowledge them
12-05-2019 01:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TigerBlue4Ever Offline
Unapologetic A-hole
*

Posts: 72,323
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 5665
I Root For: yo mama
Location: is everything
Post: #40
RE: House releases Impeachment report
(12-03-2019 02:52 PM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  Cant get passed this paragraph...

"As this report details, the impeachment inquiry has found that President Trump,
personally and acting through agents within and outside of the U.S. government, solicited the
interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, to benefit his reelection. In furtherance of this
scheme, President Trump conditioned official acts on a public announcement by the new
Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, of politically-motivated investigations, including one
into President Trump’s domestic political opponent. In pressuring President Zelensky to carry
out his demand, President Trump withheld a White House meeting desperately sought by the
Ukrainian President, and critical U.S. military assistance to fight Russian aggression in eastern
Ukraine. "

So much wrong and partisan bull**** in here.

On at least 4 occasions Zelensky has publicly stated there was no pressure, no quid pro quo and the democrats ignore it. We aren't ignoring it.
12-05-2019 04:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.