Let's see how Joe gets sonny boy out of this mess. I am sure he is trying.

Quote:The lawyer representing Hunter Biden in his paternity case abruptly withdrew on Monday while his client blew off the hearing, DailyMail.com can exclusively reveal.

Biden, 49, was not in the second-floor courtroom in Batesville, Arkansas, when his attorney former Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel quit.

But Lunden Roberts, 28, the woman who claims the son of former Vice-President Joe Biden fathered her child, was seen for the first time since filing her paternity suit, sitting in the front row of the spectators’ gallery wearing three-inch black heels.

Biden is said to have met Roberts when she was working as a stripper in a ‘gentlemen’s club’ in Washington D.C.

In the hearing, Judge Don McSpadden said he would need at least three years of Biden’s tax returns before he could reach a decision on monetary support for the child, whose sex has not been revealed.

Earlier this week, DailyMail.com revealed Biden filed a request to seal all financial records to spare himself public ’embarrassment’ amid claims of ‘significant debts’.

Link

But he’s a good boy.....

(12-03-2019 10:30 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  But he’s a good boy.....

what led to those significant debts are now a 'problem'....

#oopsBaby

What if we find based off tax returns that he claimed $0 and everyone knows he was making bank from Burisma...

(12-03-2019 10:42 AM)gdunn Wrote:  What if we find based off tax returns that he claimed $0 and everyone knows he was making bank from Burisma...

I'm SURE he'll gladly release them as soon as his audit is done.

(12-03-2019 10:48 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm SURE he'll gladly release them as soon as his audit is done.

Unlike the President where it's a courtesy and not a requirement, for Biden's love child the judge needs to know of his financials so he can be RESPONSIBLE for his child. You know the one he had with the stripper he never met...

(12-03-2019 10:50 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 10:48 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I'm SURE he'll gladly release them as soon as his audit is done.

Unlike the President where it's a courtesy and not a requirement, for Biden's love child the judge needs to know of his financials so he can be RESPONSIBLE for his child. You know the one he had with the stripper he never met...

shhhhhhhh....you're confusing him now....

never mind....stomp his pee-hole into the dirt....

I'm on ignore.. He won't see it.. Even if he was to see it, he won't respond because he can't deal with logic or grown up conversation.

(12-03-2019 10:53 AM)gdunn Wrote:  I'm on ignore.. He won't see it.. Even if he was to see it, he won't respond because he can't deal with logic or grown up conversation.

embrace the beauty of being on ignore....

We all just saw what he tried to do which is deflect because even though he doesn't support the Dems, he sure does fight hard to defend them.

(12-03-2019 10:58 AM)gdunn Wrote:  We all just saw what he tried to do which is deflect because even though he doesn't support the Dems, he sure does fight hard to defend them.

he's let go of 'that' rope....

he's all-in on the paid operative side of the equation....

he's become silly putty on a 100+ degree day on the biatch....

like any of today's dem, he offers nothing solvent in return....

he deserves every single bit of scorn as mandated by lines 3 >>> 4....

(12-03-2019 10:48 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  A dimocrat is in trouble! Must use my deflection powers to protect him! Captain Socialism to the rescue!

FIFY

About ten responses and he wonders if he won the debate because no one was brave enough to deal with his ‘logic’. Just as most democrats, he can’t handle facts so he chooses not to even see or hear them. As a result the comments become about him.

It was a joke lamebrains.

(12-03-2019 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It was a joke lamebrains.

OK. I can live with that. If that’s what it was.

(12-03-2019 11:48 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It was a joke lamebrains.

OK. I can live with that. If that’s what it was.

Of course. When have I ever defended Hunter Biden of anything? It's more than clear he was hired because of who he was. Just like Jared and Ivanka. They don't have any experience either.

(12-03-2019 11:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 11:48 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It was a joke lamebrains.

OK. I can live with that. If that’s what it was.

Of course. When have I ever defended Hunter Biden of anything? It's more than clear he was hired because of who he was. Just like Jared and Ivanka. They don't have any experience either.

Let me point out to you if you didn’t know, Jared and Ivanka do the hiring.

(12-03-2019 11:55 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 11:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 11:48 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It was a joke lamebrains.

OK. I can live with that. If that’s what it was.

Of course. When have I ever defended Hunter Biden of anything? It's more than clear he was hired because of who he was. Just like Jared and Ivanka. They don't have any experience either.

Let me point out to you if you didn’t know, Jared and Ivanka do the hiring.

bwahahahahahahaha.....

(12-03-2019 11:51 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 11:48 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(12-03-2019 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It was a joke lamebrains.

OK. I can live with that. If that’s what it was.

Of course. When have I ever defended Hunter Biden of anything? It's more than clear he was hired because of who he was. Just like Jared and Ivanka. They don't have any experience either.

Jared and Ivanka ain't on trial here genius.