Quote:Prince Andrew has kept in constant contact with accused madam Ghislaine Maxwell even as they both became increasingly embroiled in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, according to a report Sunday.

The prince had a secret meeting with Epstein’s ex at Buckingham Palace in June — and has been talking to her throughout the escalating scandal that saw him dumped of royal duties, according to The Sun.

“They have remained constantly in touch by phone and email,” a source told the UK paper.

“They talk regularly. If he wasn’t in the spotlight at the moment he would have found a way to meet up with her.”

Andrew’s downfall was in part sparked by his loyalty to Epstein, 57, remaining friends and staying in his Manhattan mansion even after he was convicted of sex with underage girls.

Now the 59-year-old prince has remained close to Maxwell, according to The Sun, even after she is reportedly at the heart of an ongoing FBI investigation over allegations that she recruited young girls for the late pedophile.

“Andrew has always been very stubborn and as far as he is concerned both he and Ghislaine have done nothing wrong and so why should anything get in the way of a friendship that has lasted more than 20 years,” the source told the paper.

“The Duke has an unswerving loyalty to Ghislaine and she is also very loyal to him.

“Ghislaine will do anything to protect the Duke and the feeling is mutual. They both share the same view they have done nothing wrong.”

The pair are said to be nervously awaiting a Monday night TV special with Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who has said in court filings that she was forced to have sex with Andrew three times, including at Maxwell’s London home.

“Everyone is on tenterhooks especially after the backlash to the Duke’s ‘Newsnight’ interview – no one saw the fall-out from that coming, especially the Duke,” a source told The Sun.

“It’s fair to say everyone is nervously chewing their lips at Buckingham Palace to see what she will say.”

Buckingham Palace has repeatedly denied all the allegations against him. Andrew also denied them during his BBC interview, saying he does not even recall meeting Giuffre and suggesting the photo of them together could be fake.

Link

Of course he denies it, but this activity sure makes it suspicious that Andrew was dipping his noodle in the kiddie pool, doesn't it?

Unless he comes up with some serious/credible answers — and is quick about it — Prince Andrew is going to be a social outcast for the rest of his life.

And even if he does come up with the answers, he might be an outcast anyway.

(12-02-2019 05:22 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Unless he comes up with some serious/credible answers — and is quick about it — Prince Andrew is going to be a social outcast for the rest of his life.

And even if he does come up with the answers, he might be an outcast anyway.

the brits don't forget with drool sliding off the fangs.....

he's toast and was always irrelevant in most 'eyes'....

he ranks up there with the asperger climate 'change' cult teenie...

how any of this matters is beyond tard...

the wealth of the crown will always absorb....like the dippos, that's all they have left...

(12-02-2019 05:22 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Unless he comes up with some serious/credible answers — and is quick about it — Prince Andrew is going to be a social outcast for the rest of his life.

And even if he does come up with the answers, he might be an outcast anyway.

It's time to blow up the whole monarchy thing anyway...

https://www.newsweek.com/royal-family-mo...th-1446882

Why do you want to see the British monarchy end?

Graham Smith: There are three very simple reasons. The first one is a matter of principle. The [royal family] is fairly undemocratic and we're supposed to be a democratic society. It's not a principled institution we ought to be supporting in 2019.

Secondly, the lack of democracy is illustrated in the way [the family] behaves. It behaves in a way that really wouldn't be appropriate for a modern democracy in the sense that it's secretive, its unaccountable and it awfully abuses public money. [The family] abuse their public position to influence government and lobby for their own interests.

And it's also a central part of the U.K.'s constitution, which is deeply flawed. A lot of that comes back to the power of the crown exercised by the Queen on behalf of the government. It leads to a highly centralized political system where parliament has very little independent authority over the government.

Christopher Hitchens (who died in 2011) once wrote (or words to this effect)

“I used to hope that I might outlive the British monarchy. Now I’m beginning to think I already have.”

(12-03-2019 12:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Christopher Hitchens (who died in 2011) once wrote (or words to this effect)

“I used to hope that I might outlive the British monarchy. Now I’m beginning to think I already have.”

you/he understand why we're fighting the 21st century version within the 'borders'....

trust me....they don't want to see nuts zongo on the battlefield....that's the way it plays out "if"....