Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Detective Nunes is on the case.
Author Message
SoMs Eagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,998
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
Post: #81
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-03-2019 04:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 04:03 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 03:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  From Lev Parnas' attorney:


03-lmfao

What is any of that supposed to "prove"?

They talked? And?

Likely about their yoga schedules and grandkids. 07-coffee3


Funny, which deep-stater leaked all that?

They were likely planning a wedding I'm sure.

But no, sorry, these weren't leaks. This came from documents released to congress in their impeachment probe IIRC.

And speaking of deep-state leakers, remember when good 'ole Dev made his midnight run to the White House to give them information on the committee he was chairing at the time? 03-lol

Nunes sharing information with the president. Yeah the horror.....
12-03-2019 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 971
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #82
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-03-2019 04:14 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 04:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 04:03 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 03:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  From Lev Parnas' attorney:


03-lmfao

What is any of that supposed to "prove"?

They talked? And?

Likely about their yoga schedules and grandkids. 07-coffee3


Funny, which deep-stater leaked all that?

They were likely planning a wedding I'm sure.

But no, sorry, these weren't leaks. This came from documents released to congress in their impeachment probe IIRC.

And speaking of deep-state leakers, remember when good 'ole Dev made his midnight run to the White House to give them information on the committee he was chairing at the time? 03-lol

Nunes sharing information with the president. Yeah the horror.....

Dude, he took them information from his committee that was at the time looking into the White House. 04-chairshot

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/n...ims-236415
12-03-2019 04:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 30,241
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2432
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment

Survivor Champion
Post: #83
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-03-2019 04:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 04:14 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 04:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 04:03 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 03:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  From Lev Parnas' attorney:


03-lmfao

What is any of that supposed to "prove"?

They talked? And?

Likely about their yoga schedules and grandkids. 07-coffee3


Funny, which deep-stater leaked all that?

They were likely planning a wedding I'm sure.

But no, sorry, these weren't leaks. This came from documents released to congress in their impeachment probe IIRC.

And speaking of deep-state leakers, remember when good 'ole Dev made his midnight run to the White House to give them information on the committee he was chairing at the time? 03-lol

Nunes sharing information with the president. Yeah the horror.....

Dude, he took them information from his committee that was at the time looking into the White House. 04-chairshot

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/n...ims-236415
Why are you posting an article from over 2 years ago to make your point?
12-03-2019 04:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,655
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3192
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #84
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-03-2019 09:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Are you treating this like a regular crime in a regular court that you and I are subject to, or a matter clearly spelled out in the Constitution that applies to the president and other elected officials?

For a matter as serious as impeachment, I would expect more rigorous standards than for a jaywalking case, not less.

Quote:Regardless, I have N O doubt trump held up the funds for the sole purpose of having Ukraine announce an investigation.

You have no doubt, despite the fact that you have no proof. Sounds like you OD'd on bias and prejudice.

Quote:They have yet to provide any just basis as to why the funds were held up, and then they just released them anyway as soon as they were caught when no further corruption in Ukraine was being investigated. So they're saying Ukraine just magically became un-corrupt?

They are under no obligation to provide a basis, or anything else, unless and until a prima facie case is made out against them.

Quote:Additionally, if they claim fund were held because Ukraine is/was corrupt, that just doesn't hold water since trump is asking them to also launch an investigation into Biden. If they are corrupt, why would you have them investigate a US citizen...and your likely presidential opponent in 2020?

Why? Simple. They have the jurisdiction and they have the investigative tools, presumably including subpoena. Tell me, how would you get hold of Burisma records without Ukrainian assistance?

And are you saying that running for president exempts someone from being subject to investigation?

Since you mentioned no doubt, I have no doubt that there was some funny business going on with Hunter Biden's compensation plan. You don't pat that kind of money to someone who brings nothing to the table except his father, without something improper going on. Does it rise to the level of a crime? I don't know. That's why you have investigations. And when the acts occurred in somebody else's jurisdiction, you need their help to do it
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2019 06:50 PM by Owl 69/70/75.)
12-03-2019 05:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cb4029 Offline
The spoon that stirs the pot.
*

Posts: 18,793
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 353
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham

Donators
Post: #85
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-03-2019 04:13 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 04:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 04:03 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  
(12-03-2019 03:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  From Lev Parnas' attorney:


03-lmfao

What is any of that supposed to "prove"?

They talked? And?

Likely about their yoga schedules and grandkids. 07-coffee3


Funny, which deep-stater leaked all that?

They were likely planning a wedding I'm sure.

But no, sorry, these weren't leaks. This came from documents released to congress in their impeachment probe IIRC.


This has been known for a while. These Ukrainians were pointing them around to who was doing what in the Ukraine. They were a conduit and now they are targets. Who knows how valuable they actually were. Bet they say anything at this point to stay alive.

So we could believe them before we couldn't believe them. Gotcha.
12-03-2019 07:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cb4029 Offline
The spoon that stirs the pot.
*

Posts: 18,793
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 353
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham

Donators
Post: #86
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
The way Rudy was waving his phone around on TV, I was starting to think it was his get out of jail free card. Me thinks he's probably the smartest one of these three stooges. FE FI FO FLIPPED
12-03-2019 07:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,655
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3192
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #87
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-03-2019 04:09 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  
(11-28-2019 09:34 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 06:05 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  The Whistleblowers claims have been backed by testimony, under oath. So far, no one has been willing to do the same for the President.
Surely Rudy, Pompeo, Pence, McGahn or Mulvaney would be willing to testify on his behalf?
As I understand it, the whistleblower basically said that he/she had heard rumors, and what has been supported is that they heard similar rumors. So in that sense, yes those claims have been confirmed.
Are the rumors true? We don’t know. We know that it’s true there we rumors.
Simply allow those with direct knowledge to testify... Mulvaney, Pompeo, Guiliani, McGhan need to come forward, under oath, and testify on the President’s behalf.

Why? Why do they need to? Why would they want to?

Seems to me that the burden is on those asserting the rumors to prove them true before there is any obligation for anyone to prove them false. You don't have to prove yourself innocent in our system.

"We've got a bunch of rumors and it's up to you to prove them false," is how the criminal justice system worked in Nazi Germany. Are you really wanting to go there? I don't.

And yes, impeachment is a political process as much as a criminal justice process. That does not mean that the protections should be lowered.

This whole idea is being bandied about as a political talking point. And if any of them did show up, they would face endless grilling to uncover anything that could be used politically to embarrass the president and the republicans. It's a fishing expedition, not an evidentiary process.
(This post was last modified: 12-04-2019 09:20 AM by Owl 69/70/75.)
12-04-2019 09:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,655
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3192
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #88
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-02-2019 10:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  What "rumors"? Did you not listen to testimony the last two weeks, UNDER OATH, that backed up what was in the WB report?
These are not rumors. We know fairly certain what happened on the call and what happened with the aid being held up. What we don't know yet is whether the acts by the president will get him removed from office by the senate. Aid was withheld, fact. Investigations into the Bidens were requested, fact. The White House is withholding evidence from Congress, fact. Now, we can argue legalities and whether these actions are justified or not, but you're not entitled to call these facts "rumors".

But what did they testify to? That they heard rumors, that there were things said about the situation in conversations, that they expressed opinions in emails, that there were all sorts of rumors and allegations and opinions. Did anyone testify that he or she had actual first hand knowledge that Donald Trump did X for reason Y? If so, I missed it.

None of your facts constitute a basis for criminal prosecution, or presumably for impeachment. The stuff you need to get there is in the rumors and opinions and innuendo.

(12-02-2019 10:08 AM)gdunn Wrote:  So let's be clear, if they're under oath and lied, they could see jailtime right?

To see jail time, they would have to have lied intentionally about factual information. "I heard somebody say something," is not actionable if that somebody actually said that something. "I heard something that concerned me," is not actionable if the speaker was actually concerned. But those don't go to prove facts. Doing it all second-hand like this is a way to create an illusion without anybody being on the hook for perjury.
(This post was last modified: 12-04-2019 10:00 AM by Owl 69/70/75.)
12-04-2019 09:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Progressive filth
*

Posts: 51,524
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 971
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Soros' Basement
Post: #89
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
12-05-2019 02:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 30,241
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2432
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment

Survivor Champion
Post: #90
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
Same man who read the transcript for the call, put his twist on it, and when called out said he was joking..

Sound familiar?
12-05-2019 02:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SoMs Eagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,998
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
Post: #91
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-03-2019 07:40 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  The way Rudy was waving his phone around on TV, I was starting to think it was his get out of jail free card. Me thinks he's probably the smartest one of these three stooges. FE FI FO FLIPPED

Didn’t Flynn flip?
12-05-2019 03:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SoMs Eagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,998
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 683
I Root For: Mighty Mustard
Location:
Post: #92
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
Rudy is back on a plane to the Ukraine. 03-lmfao
12-05-2019 03:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagleaidaholic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,070
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 766
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #93
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-05-2019 03:05 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Rudy is back on a plane to the Ukraine. 03-lmfao

All one needs is a Passport to do such things.
12-05-2019 03:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,655
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3192
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #94
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-05-2019 02:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

And you believe him?
12-05-2019 07:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b0ndsj0ns Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,059
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 1018
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #95
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
I miss when the GOP used to pretend to care about tort reform. Nunes has filed more complete joke lawsuits than any individual in the country. He's now filed a $435,350,000 defamation lawsuit against CNN. Here's a listing of his lawsuits filed just this year.

In March, he sued Twitter, some rabble-rousing accounts — named Devin Nunes’ Mom and Devin Nunes’ Cow — and Republican consultant Liz Mair. Those folks, he alleged, were engaged in a “concerted defamation campaign."
In April, he sued the McClatchy newspaper chain over a story in the Fresno Bee about the activities of a winery in which Nunes holds a stake.
In September, he sued Hearst Magazines and journalist Ryan Lizza over a September 2018 feature story about his family’s dairy business.

This guy is a clown.
12-06-2019 09:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 30,241
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2432
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment

Survivor Champion
Post: #96
RE: Detective Nunes is on the case.
(12-06-2019 09:09 AM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  I miss when the GOP used to pretend to care about tort reform. Nunes has filed more complete joke lawsuits than any individual in the country. He's now filed a $435,350,000 defamation lawsuit against CNN. Here's a listing of his lawsuits filed just this year.

In March, he sued Twitter, some rabble-rousing accounts — named Devin Nunes’ Mom and Devin Nunes’ Cow — and Republican consultant Liz Mair. Those folks, he alleged, were engaged in a “concerted defamation campaign."
In April, he sued the McClatchy newspaper chain over a story in the Fresno Bee about the activities of a winery in which Nunes holds a stake.
In September, he sued Hearst Magazines and journalist Ryan Lizza over a September 2018 feature story about his family’s dairy business.

This guy is a clown.

Most in the government are...
12-06-2019 09:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.