So there are twins involved in this story right?
It sounds like the mother is trying to run some type of twisted experiment on the boys' transitioning one to a girl and leaving the other one as a boy

(10-25-2019 04:24 PM)solohawks Wrote:  So there are twins involved in this story right?
It sounds like the mother is trying to run some type of twisted experiment on the boys' transitioning one to a girl and leaving the other one as a boy

Yup. I wonder if she has a Swastika in her background?

(10-25-2019 04:24 PM)solohawks Wrote:  So there are twins involved in this story right?
It sounds like the mother is trying to run some type of twisted experiment on the boys' transitioning one to a girl and leaving the other one as a boy

I wouldn't doubt one moment that this wacko, satanic woman is doing it, yes, as an experiment and to write a book afterward. If that's why she's doing it she is destroying a perfectly made little boy and turning him into a mutant.

Update on James

Per this report he is chosing to go to school as a boy

(11-06-2019 09:18 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Update on James

Per this report he is chosing to go to school as a boy

Well, good, you know, because HE is a BOY.

I feel like there has to be more to this story. It was a jury trial in Dallas, Texas. What did the jury see that we're not seeing?

(11-07-2019 10:09 AM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  I feel like there has to be more to this story. It was a jury trial in Dallas, Texas. What did the jury see that we're not seeing?

There's always stuff that doesn't get in the papers.

Maybe the dad is a bit weird too.

(11-07-2019 10:20 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-07-2019 10:09 AM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  I feel like there has to be more to this story. It was a jury trial in Dallas, Texas. What did the jury see that we're not seeing?

There's always stuff that doesn't get in the papers.

Maybe the dad is a bit weird too.

I agree with this sentiment that there is a lot of missing info here. Apparently the dad had quite a checkered past while the mom is a pediatrician

(11-07-2019 10:09 AM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  I feel like there has to be more to this story. It was a jury trial in Dallas, Texas. What did the jury see that we're not seeing?

The father sued for full custody so the jury was only deciding on full custody and the judge ruled on the others.

I read the other day that the judge ended up deciding on 50/50 with both parents needing to agree on medical decisions

Mother in Dallas 7-year-old transgender child custody case calls for judge’s recusal

(11-07-2019 10:38 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-07-2019 10:20 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-07-2019 10:09 AM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  I feel like there has to be more to this story. It was a jury trial in Dallas, Texas. What did the jury see that we're not seeing?

There's always stuff that doesn't get in the papers.

Maybe the dad is a bit weird too.

I agree with this sentiment that there is a lot of missing info here. Apparently the dad had quite a checkered past while the mom is a pediatrician

That is scary.

https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/...ans-child/

n truth, it’s progressive attitudes that are victimizing the child, and James Younger is not an outlier. There are many more just like him, and some in even more dire straits. For years, the medical and legal establishments have been ignoring evidence and bending their standards to please transgender activists, some of whom are clinicians. There are three clinical approaches to helping children who exhibit symptoms of gender confusion. One involves a range of talk therapies and psychotherapies to address suspected underlying causes. A second, called “watchful waiting,” allows the child’s development to unfold as it will, which may mean that he chooses to transition later or not at all.

Then there is a third option — informed by an ideology according to which it is possible for a child to be “born in the wrong body.” In this option, clinical activists recommend a drastic response when a child expresses confusion about gender. First, parents should tell the child, however young, that he truly is the sex he identifies with. Second, parents should consider delaying his puberty through off-label uses of drugs that can have serious (and largely unstudied) side effects. Third, parents should consider giving their child the puberty experience of the opposite sex, through cross-sex hormonal injections and gels (which result in sterility). Finally, parents should consider greenlighting the surgical removal of their child’s reproductive organs.

Since there are no objective tests to confirm a transgender diagnosis, all of this is arbitrary and dependent on a child’s changeable feelings. To make aggressive treatment more acceptable, its advocates have come up with a media-friendly euphemism, “gender affirmation...."

“Despite the differences in country, culture, decade, and follow-up length and method,” notes James Cantor, a Canadian psychologist with decades of clinical and research experience in treating transsexuals, “all the studies have come to a remarkably similar conclusion: Only very few trans-kids still want to transition by the time they are adults.” From these studies, conducted prior to the cultural mainstreaming of gender-identity theory, it consistently appears that 80 percent of gender-confused children psychologically realign with their biological sex by young adulthood or sooner when supported through their natural puberty with non-invasive therapies such as watchful waiting. Realignment was (and, among more cautious professionals, still is) considered the ideal outcome, since it is obviously easier for a child to change his thinking than to try to change his sex...."

This is later in the article. This person should not be a parent:


"...At James’s age, children “can’t make rational decisions” and are “very easily influenced,” Hopewell stated in his September deposition for the trial. He also said that this “settled science,” pioneered by psychologist Jean Piaget, is “at the level of Galileo’s statement of how the Earth revolves around the sun.” While a child can express preferences — “Do I want the M&M or do I want the mushroom?” — a seven-year-old is incapable of decisions of the magnitude of trying to “change your sex,” which, at any rate, “you can’t do.”

Georgulas testified that she felt justified in socially transitioning James into Luna by her own experience as a pediatrician, by researching the medical literature on the subject, and by the support she has received online from similarly situated parents...."

(11-22-2019 12:24 PM)bullet Wrote:  This is later in the article. This person should not be a parent:


"...At James’s age, children “can’t make rational decisions” and are “very easily influenced,” Hopewell stated in his September deposition for the trial. He also said that this “settled science,” pioneered by psychologist Jean Piaget, is “at the level of Galileo’s statement of how the Earth revolves around the sun.” While a child can express preferences — “Do I want the M&M or do I want the mushroom?” — a seven-year-old is incapable of decisions of the magnitude of trying to “change your sex,” which, at any rate, “you can’t do.”

Georgulas testified that she felt justified in socially transitioning James into Luna by her own experience as a pediatrician, by researching the medical literature on the subject, and by the support she has received online from similarly situated parents...."

Woman is a nut and should have her medical license revoked.

Texas might as well be blue.

Texas SCOTUS rules against father seeking to prevent 'chemical castration' of his son

Quote:Jeffrey Younger has lost his court case to prevent his ex-wife from taking their son to California, where he could be medically transitioned. Younger has been trying to stop this from happening for years, and has now reached the end of the line. He is prevented by the courts of Texas from protecting his boys from medical mutilation at the hands of their mother, who is a pediatrician. Younger has accused her of using the children to help advertise her "inclusive," "gender affirming" practice.

"The Supreme Court of Texas denied my Mandamus, effectively terminating my parental rights. My children are now subject to being chemically castrated in California. Texas is an empire of child abuse, led by Texas judges," he said.

This after Judge Kim Cooks, on October 24, said that both parents should have a "joint managing conservatorship," which each able to have "a say in his medical treatment," The Texan reported.

The custody case was before the Supreme Court of Texas, which ruled against Younger. Younger had issued a petition on December 16 to try to retain his parental rights after his ex-wife, Dr. Anne Georgulas, took the boys to California.

California has a law in place, starting on Sunday, that children in that state will not be returned to their home state in the event that the home state would prevent the children from being medically transitioned to present as the opposite sex. Younger wanted the boys brought home.

California Senate Bill 107, proposed by State Senator Scott Wiener and signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom, will "prohibit the enforcement of an order based on another state’s law authorizing a child to be removed from their parent or guardian based on that parent or guardian allowing their child to receive gender-affirming health care or gender-affirming mental health care."

Younger's concern, per his petition, is that in California, his son "would be subjected to transgender procedures deemed to be child abuse by official opinion of the Texas Attorney General." Texas has laws against the medical gender transition of children and teens.

"The Children would lose the protections of injunctions on the Mother that prevent her from chemically castrating the Children or sexually mutilating them in transgender surgeries," younger said in his petition, according to The Texan.

Younger was married to pediatrician Georgulas. Georgulas and Younger ended up in court fighting over the children when she believed that James, Younger's 7-year-old, wanted to live as a girl called Luna.

She petitioned the court to prevent Younger from "from signing Luna up as James for any activities or taking her as James or calling her James or using male pronouns related to Luna at any activities outside the home…"

She further asked the court to prevent Younger from "allowing the children to remain in the presence of anyone who is not calling Luna by her chosen name, 'Luna,' not using female pronouns to refer to her and otherwise not affirming Luna."

Georgulas began to believe James was a girl when he asked for a "girl's toy" from McDonald's and wanted to wear dresses, as well as began to emulate the female lead characters in Disney's Frozen. It was a counselor at the GENecis clinic at the Children's Hospital Center who advised Georgulas to "socially transition" James, according to court documents. Georgulas was affiliated with that hospital.

Younger, who had joint custody in 2019, was and remains entirely against this course of action. When James is with Younger, he does not ask to be called Luna, does not seek out girls' clothes. Yet a court determined that Younger must use the pronouns and names the ex-wife demanded.

In a video posted to the dad’s website, James is asked, "You’re a boy right?" Heavy reported.

"No, I’m a girl."

"Who told you you’re a girl?"

"Mommy."

The child said Anne also put James in dresses. "She buys me headbands. She gets me hair clips…she paints my nails."

“Do you think you’re a girl?” The child answered in the affirmative.

Georgulas was awarded custody by the Texas courts in 2021. "Dallas County District Court Judge Mary Brown awarded Georgulas full custody of James. Brown also eliminated the requirement that Jeff Younger be notified about James’ medical procedures, except for instances of hormone suppression therapy, puberty-blocking drugs, and gender reassignment surgery. Under that order, Younger must consent to any decisions made under those categories of procedure," The Texan reported.

Witnesses who knew the boys and could attest that James did not identify as a girl when left to his own devices, were prevented from testifying in the case. One mother of the boys' friends said, in testimony she wasn't allowed to give in 2019, that:

"Over the past year, I have observed that James is blissfully happy as a boy. He loves to march around outside and yell, ‘we are the only boy scout troop’ or ‘I’m the Leader of the wolf pack!’ He is always the ring leader, even though he isn’t the oldest of the group. He loves dressing as a super hero and sword fighting. One day we all walked to a playground near my house and on the way home James slipped in some mud and got his clothes dirty. He asked if he could borrow some of my kids clothes and I could wash his.

"Of course I said, ‘no problem’ and grabbed him a pair of shorts from the chest of drawers and tossed them to him. I said, ‘hang on while I grab a shirt from the closet’. He immediately said, ‘Mrs. Sarah, I don’t need a shirt! It’s hot! And boys don’t have to wear shirts if they don’t want to! Isn’t that awesome!’ He was so cute. I said, ‘yes that is awesome!’ As he ran off to play. I did eventually get him to put on a shirt. It was gray with lizards on it and he loved it! He also likes having his hair cut a certain way but told my son Grayson that his mom wouldn’t let him get it too short even though he wanted it to be spikey."

The Office of the Attorney General of Texas filed an amicus letter with the courts on December 22, 2022, saying "a trial court has allowed relator’s former partner to move to California with their children over relator’s objection. There, she intends to provide the child with potentially irreversible medical interventions that may constitute child abuse under Texas law, Atty Gen. Op. KP-0401—particularly given that a court has previously found that 'Mom may have over corrected' for any symptoms of gender confusion exhibited by their child, Pet. 8 (excerpting order). The trial court clearly abused its discretion in permitting relator’s former partner to remove the children from the State given the ongoing litigation regarding their well-being. And that error may be irremediable on appeal because California has enacted a law that makes it difficult (if not impossible) for Relator to regain custody of his vulnerable child."

When Younger attemtped to speak out about gender transition at the University of North Texas, he was prevented from doing so by far-left activists who shut the speaking engagement down.

A 7 year old is not capable of making such a decision..PERIOD. Anyone that would do this to a child is beyond a monster. Honestly...Id probably resort to violence to prevent this if it was my son. I would not give a schit what judge, court or law said differently.

(12-31-2022 03:31 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  A 7 year old is not capable of making such a decision..PERIOD. Anyone that would do this to a child is beyond a monster. Honestly...Id probably resort to violence to prevent this if it was my son. I would not give a schit what judge, court or law said differently.

While I feel gender dysphoria is absolutely a mental illness, a competent adult can and should be able to make the decision to transition via surgery at their own expense. Does not mean that I agree with this mutilation, but shows my belief in personal choice to do something as destructive as this, as long as I don't pay for it, nor does it harm anyone else.

However, a pre-pubescent child does not have a fully formed brain nor enough experience to resist outside forces attempting to influence such radical decisions. Kids at this age mostly crave approval from authority figures, even if these folks do not have the child's best interests at heart. Let the child turn 18 and make the decision as a legal adult. Again, I don't like it or support it, but a 7-year old should not be sexual, so why does this need to happen so early. This social engineering for less than 1% of our population is ridiculous and harmful. Let the kids be kids, even if labeled a "tomboy" or a "sissy". If such kids want to transition when a legal adult, best of luck to them, just don't make me pay for it and expect my children to support it.

Disgusting and Unforgivable!

A child simply doesn't know yet, either way, and should have time to grow and consider it in maturity.

Our society is ill, our great republic all but destroyed and evil is running rampant. I'm glad I'm old and with any luck I won't live to see the total destruction and ensuing chaos as we go down in flames. Historians - rational ones anyway - will look back on this period as one of the oddest ever.

that's one helluva an updated story to wake up to in this new year...

my heart just sank a tad further into the abyss of distrust and sadness within the inhumane...

shite like this simply sickens me ... maybe the blind and deaf have it best...

#happyFK'NnewYear