(09-24-2019 02:15 PM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote: (09-24-2019 02:06 PM)Yosef Himself Wrote: I'd rather have NCA&T than NMSU in the conference. No offense to the Aggies, but y'all just too far away.
I think if they ever had a legitimate shot at staying or becoming full members it would've happened during their sales pitch they made which was ultimately shot down by league officials (though I always found it interesting TMo was a public proponent of adding them as full members).
I'm sure MWC is the dream but I just can't see them adding the aggies and sitting at uneven numbers.
I still think they're best bet is trying to spearhead the effort at re-establishing football in the WAC with Dixie State (who's moving their football to FCS currently) and trying to get some Big Sky Folks (like Idaho) to defect.
I've wondered about that myself. After 2013 (when TXST, UTA, UTSA, LTU, SJSU, and Utah State left), they reloaded with the Great West schools. Its been a mixed bag of D1 non football schools, and they havent had much luck pulling any D1 schools into their league.
So far, their course of action has been to invite non-D1 schools without football with aspirations of D1. Grand Canyon, Cal State Bako, Utah Valley. However, that I wonder if that well is starting to run dry as well. The other schools that have been recently linked to the conference include Dixie State (D2 football), Colorado Mesa (d2 football), Tarleton State (d2 football).
Based on the D1 study on Tarleton's website, the WAC expressed interest but Tarleton needed a place for football. What if the league is ready to restart FCS football as a way of getting a new crop of FCS schools?
My question to you is, its one thing to offer a path for D2 schools to move up to D1 but is going to pull someone from the Big Sky to a WAC that is trying to find its brand?