(08-22-2019 08:35 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 08:26 AM)Tiger87 Wrote:  Cal also had pretty bad losses to UTK (18 pts) and Ohio State (16 pts) in 2007.
In 2006, there was Texas (11 pts).
2005 - Syracuse (15 pts), Maryland (23 pts), Pitt (19 pts), Old Miss (12 pts), Providence (13 pts), TCU (12 pts), Houston (13 pts), and St. Joe's (12 pts).
Need I go on?

But you never miss a game...

2006 one loss in double digits which is what I said. And 2 in a season to very good teams is great. You left off 2008. How many double digit losses in 2006 to 2008? And many of those were fouling trying to catch up losses.

And s*** head, copy and paste where I said I never miss a game. You are a liar. Here and probably in your life.

(08-22-2019 11:43 AM)WiseMan Wrote:  2006[/size] one loss in double digits which is what I said. And 2 in a season to very good teams is great. You left off 2008. How many double digit losses in 2006 to 2008? And many of those were fouling trying to catch up losses.

And s*** head, copy and paste where I said I never miss a game. You are a liar. Here and probably in your life.

Surely everyone knows they didn't lose but 2 games in 2008 and zero by double-digits. But that was not what you stated.

From 2006-08 there were 3 losses by double-digits. Don't know how many were due to fouls, but again, that is not what you stated.

And no one is even arguing that those teams were great. They mostly were. The point is about your ongoing struggle with logic and debate when it comes to this board.

I will copy your original post in my next reply, to remind you what you actually stated...

(08-17-2019 08:21 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 07:17 PM)rolexjames Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 06:08 PM)k2tigers Wrote:  Nov 12 vs. Oregon in Portland will be a tough out for us

Yes it will. I hope to win but I really don't want to get embarrassed.

I don’t think this team will get embarrassed a single time this year. Winners won’t allow it. I think one of Cal’s teams lost one game by double digits-maybe 11 or 12.

...See. Let's breakdown your post:

You were the first one to bring up Cal in this thread. It was a bit illogical, since he has nothing to do with this team, but not unexpected. No one was arguing with you about whether Cal's teams were great or winners or never got embarrassed.

Then you say "one of Cal’s teams lost one game by double digits-maybe 11 or 12". Set aside the fact no one was talking about Cal. That's just a dumb statement. Cal lost plenty of games by double-digits, not just one game. No one was talking about 2006, that you later brought up. No one was even talking about 2009 - yet. If you had meant one team only lost one bad game in one season, you should have stated it differently (and that wouldn't have even been notable to begin with). Instead, you just made a dumb statement that was not true.

More to be continued...

(08-21-2019 10:23 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-21-2019 03:18 PM)presskh Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 08:21 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 07:17 PM)rolexjames Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 06:08 PM)k2tigers Wrote:  Nov 12 vs. Oregon in Portland will be a tough out for us

Yes it will. I hope to win but I really don't want to get embarrassed.

I don’t think this team will get embarrassed a single time this year. Winners won’t allow it. I think one of Cal’s teams lost one game by double digits-maybe 11 or 12.

We lost Cal's last game as our coach by double digits.

It certainly wasn’t the 2009 team.

...Now we have someone who points out your dumb post was not factual. That, in fact, Cal lost his very last game as a Tiger by double-digits.

But you double-down on dumbness. You say it "certainly" wasn't the 2009 team. I try not to reply to most of your posts. It's just not worth it. But after you double-down, I couldn't help myself. So I spent about 3 minutes going back and getting all the double-digit losses Cal had in just the last 4 years he was here - including, yes, the very last game that you say it "certainly" was not double-digits.

Now, I doubt at this point your reasoning is going to get any better. So the best thing you could do to help yourself is, of the large amount of time you spend posting here, spend some of that time googling some of your "facts" beforehand. This might seem unnecessary since you've been to every game ever played within 100 miles of Memphis - but trust me when I say it is necessary.

(08-19-2019 10:14 AM)misplaced tiger Wrote:  Wiseman > Dante
Precious > CJ Walker
DJ > Lawson

Need I go on?

ARE THESE TWO COUSINS ?

(08-22-2019 01:45 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(08-21-2019 10:23 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-21-2019 03:18 PM)presskh Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 08:21 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 07:17 PM)rolexjames Wrote:  Yes it will. I hope to win but I really don't want to get embarrassed.

I don’t think this team will get embarrassed a single time this year. Winners won’t allow it. I think one of Cal’s teams lost one game by double digits-maybe 11 or 12.

We lost Cal's last game as our coach by double digits.

It certainly wasn’t the 2009 team.

...Now we have someone who points out your dumb post was not factual. That, in fact, Cal lost his very last game as a Tiger by double-digits.

But you double-down on dumbness. You say it "certainly" wasn't the 2009 team. I try not to reply to most of your posts. It's just not worth it. But after you double-down, I couldn't help myself. So I spent about 3 minutes going back and getting all the double-digit losses Cal had in just the last 4 years he was here - including, yes, the very last game that you say it "certainly" was not double-digits.

Now, I doubt at this point your reasoning is going to get any better. So the best thing you could do to help yourself is, of the large amount of time you spend posting here, spend some of that time googling some of your "facts" beforehand. This might seem unnecessary since you've been to every game ever played within 100 miles of Memphis - but trust me when I say it is necessary.

(08-22-2019 03:53 PM)TIGER DENO Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 10:14 AM)misplaced tiger Wrote:  Wiseman > Dante
Precious > CJ Walker
DJ > Lawson

Need I go on?

ARE THESE TWO COUSINS ?

Yes

(08-22-2019 04:36 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 03:53 PM)TIGER DENO Wrote:  

(08-19-2019 10:14 AM)misplaced tiger Wrote:  Wiseman > Dante
Precious > CJ Walker
DJ > Lawson

Need I go on?

ARE THESE TWO COUSINS ?

Yes

Yeah, but the games in Oregon. Gone Be Tough !!

(08-22-2019 01:45 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(08-21-2019 10:23 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-21-2019 03:18 PM)presskh Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 08:21 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-17-2019 07:17 PM)rolexjames Wrote:  Yes it will. I hope to win but I really don't want to get embarrassed.

I don’t think this team will get embarrassed a single time this year. Winners won’t allow it. I think one of Cal’s teams lost one game by double digits-maybe 11 or 12.

We lost Cal's last game as our coach by double digits.

It certainly wasn’t the 2009 team.

...Now we have someone who points out your dumb post was not factual. That, in fact, Cal lost his very last game as a Tiger by double-digits.

But you double-down on dumbness. You say it "certainly" wasn't the 2009 team. I try not to reply to most of your posts. It's just not worth it. But after you double-down, I couldn't help myself. So I spent about 3 minutes going back and getting all the double-digit losses Cal had in just the last 4 years he was here - including, yes, the very last game that you say it "certainly" was not double-digits.

Now, I doubt at this point your reasoning is going to get any better. So the best thing you could do to help yourself is, of the large amount of time you spend posting here, spend some of that time googling some of your "facts" beforehand. This might seem unnecessary since you've been to every game ever played within 100 miles of Memphis - but trust me when I say it is necessary.

You are a damned liar and trying to deflect your way out if it. I posted how many games I missed in a time period and YOU KNOW IT. YET YOU LIE two replies in a row in stating that I have said I WENT TO EVERY GAME. THIS IS EVEN WORSE:

“This might seem unnecessary since you've been to every game ever played within 100 miles of Memphis - but trust me when I say it is necessary.”

Find the damn quote or quit lying about it. I’VE NEVER SAID THAT.

And the 2009 quote above was either to another post and you pulled it or I made a mistake. Not wasting my time with you as you are not honest. Again, how many games did basketball team lose by double digits from 2006-2008? I doubt you know enough about basketball to answer.

(08-22-2019 01:29 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 11:43 AM)WiseMan Wrote:  2006[/size] one loss in double digits which is what I said. And 2 in a season to very good teams is great. You left off 2008. How many double digit losses in 2006 to 2008? And many of those were fouling trying to catch up losses.

And s*** head, copy and paste where I said I never miss a game. You are a liar. Here and probably in your life.

Surely everyone knows they didn't lose but 2 games in 2008 and zero by double-digits. But that was not what you stated.

From 2006-08 there were 3 losses by double-digits. Don't know how many were due to fouls, but again, that is not what you stated.

And no one is even arguing that those teams were great. They mostly were. The point is about your ongoing struggle with logic and debate when it comes to this board.

I will copy your original post in my next reply, to remind you what you actually stated...

Find my quote where I said I went to every game. Haven’t seen it yet. Do you know how rare it is for ANY basketball team to go 3 years with 3 double digit losses???

(08-22-2019 10:40 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 01:29 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 11:43 AM)WiseMan Wrote:  2006[/size] one loss in double digits which is what I said. And 2 in a season to very good teams is great. You left off 2008. How many double digit losses in 2006 to 2008? And many of those were fouling trying to catch up losses.

And s*** head, copy and paste where I said I never miss a game. You are a liar. Here and probably in your life.

Surely everyone knows they didn't lose but 2 games in 2008 and zero by double-digits. But that was not what you stated.

From 2006-08 there were 3 losses by double-digits. Don't know how many were due to fouls, but again, that is not what you stated.

And no one is even arguing that those teams were great. They mostly were. The point is about your ongoing struggle with logic and debate when it comes to this board.

I will copy your original post in my next reply, to remind you what you actually stated...

Find my quote where I said I went to every game. Haven’t seen it yet. Do you know how rare it is for ANY basketball team to go 3 years with 3 double digit losses???

Not that rare for a really good team.

(08-23-2019 07:38 AM)mairving Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 10:40 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 01:29 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 11:43 AM)WiseMan Wrote:  2006[/size] one loss in double digits which is what I said. And 2 in a season to very good teams is great. You left off 2008. How many double digit losses in 2006 to 2008? And many of those were fouling trying to catch up losses.

And s*** head, copy and paste where I said I never miss a game. You are a liar. Here and probably in your life.

Surely everyone knows they didn't lose but 2 games in 2008 and zero by double-digits. But that was not what you stated.

From 2006-08 there were 3 losses by double-digits. Don't know how many were due to fouls, but again, that is not what you stated.

And no one is even arguing that those teams were great. They mostly were. The point is about your ongoing struggle with logic and debate when it comes to this board.

I will copy your original post in my next reply, to remind you what you actually stated...

Find my quote where I said I went to every game. Haven’t seen it yet. Do you know how rare it is for ANY basketball team to go 3 years with 3 double digit losses???

Not that rare for a really good team.

It is very rare...

But it is also very rare for a team to only lose 10 games in 3 years as well.

But the main factor in the lack of double digit losses is the fact that we played in C-USA and rarely lost a game.

A 10 point loss on the road to a top 25 team is not a bad loss.

(08-23-2019 08:08 AM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 07:38 AM)mairving Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 10:40 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 01:29 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 11:43 AM)WiseMan Wrote:  2006[/size] one loss in double digits which is what I said. And 2 in a season to very good teams is great. You left off 2008. How many double digit losses in 2006 to 2008? And many of those were fouling trying to catch up losses.

And s*** head, copy and paste where I said I never miss a game. You are a liar. Here and probably in your life.

Surely everyone knows they didn't lose but 2 games in 2008 and zero by double-digits. But that was not what you stated.

From 2006-08 there were 3 losses by double-digits. Don't know how many were due to fouls, but again, that is not what you stated.

And no one is even arguing that those teams were great. They mostly were. The point is about your ongoing struggle with logic and debate when it comes to this board.

I will copy your original post in my next reply, to remind you what you actually stated...

Find my quote where I said I went to every game. Haven’t seen it yet. Do you know how rare it is for ANY basketball team to go 3 years with 3 double digit losses???

Not that rare for a really good team.

It is very rare...

But it is also very rare for a team to only lose 10 games in 3 years as well.

But the main factor in the lack of double digit losses is the fact that we played in C-USA and rarely lost a game.

A 10 point loss on the road to a top 25 team is not a bad loss.

Most of you just won’t give Cal ANY credit will you? If it was CUSA, how do you explain the good OOC wins and the best 4 game stretch (-2 minutes) maybe ever played in NCAA tournament? That team was well coached: very few bad shots, many layups, great team D, low turnovers and no up and down. Steady through the season. DRose didn’t create that Cal did. And for the naysayers, this has NOTHING to do with Penny. I’m confident he will be a Memphis legend if he leaves before fickle Memphis fans turn on him.

And I hated the way Cal left but I recognize a great coaching job (of which recruiting is 60-70% of it) when I see it. It took him longer because of no money and tough conference.

(08-23-2019 10:54 AM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 08:08 AM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 07:38 AM)mairving Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 10:40 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 01:29 PM)Tiger87 Wrote:  Surely everyone knows they didn't lose but 2 games in 2008 and zero by double-digits. But that was not what you stated.

From 2006-08 there were 3 losses by double-digits. Don't know how many were due to fouls, but again, that is not what you stated.

And no one is even arguing that those teams were great. They mostly were. The point is about your ongoing struggle with logic and debate when it comes to this board.

I will copy your original post in my next reply, to remind you what you actually stated...

Find my quote where I said I went to every game. Haven’t seen it yet. Do you know how rare it is for ANY basketball team to go 3 years with 3 double digit losses???

Not that rare for a really good team.

It is very rare...

But it is also very rare for a team to only lose 10 games in 3 years as well.

But the main factor in the lack of double digit losses is the fact that we played in C-USA and rarely lost a game.

A 10 point loss on the road to a top 25 team is not a bad loss.

Most of you just won’t give Cal ANY credit will you? If it was CUSA, how do you explain the good OOC wins and the best 4 game stretch (-2 minutes) maybe ever played in NCAA tournament? That team was well coached: very few bad shots, many layups, great team D, low turnovers and no up and down. Steady through the season. DRose didn’t create that Cal did. And for the naysayers, this has NOTHING to do with Penny. I’m confident he will be a Memphis legend if he leaves before fickle Memphis fans turn on him.

And I hated the way Cal left but I recognize a great coaching job (of which recruiting is 60-70% of it) when I see it. It took him longer because of no moneyand tough conference.

no money.

(Insert cockhead gif)

(08-23-2019 11:58 AM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 10:54 AM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 08:08 AM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 07:38 AM)mairving Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 10:40 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  Find my quote where I said I went to every game. Haven’t seen it yet. Do you know how rare it is for ANY basketball team to go 3 years with 3 double digit losses???

Not that rare for a really good team.

It is very rare...

But it is also very rare for a team to only lose 10 games in 3 years as well.

But the main factor in the lack of double digit losses is the fact that we played in C-USA and rarely lost a game.

A 10 point loss on the road to a top 25 team is not a bad loss.

Most of you just won’t give Cal ANY credit will you? If it was CUSA, how do you explain the good OOC wins and the best 4 game stretch (-2 minutes) maybe ever played in NCAA tournament? That team was well coached: very few bad shots, many layups, great team D, low turnovers and no up and down. Steady through the season. DRose didn’t create that Cal did. And for the naysayers, this has NOTHING to do with Penny. I’m confident he will be a Memphis legend if he leaves before fickle Memphis fans turn on him.

And I hated the way Cal left but I recognize a great coaching job (of which recruiting is 60-70% of it) when I see it. It took him longer because of no moneyand tough conference.

no money.

(Insert cockhead gif)

Look at attendance years before Cal came and his 10 years here. MONEY!!

(08-23-2019 12:08 PM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 11:58 AM)snowtiger Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 10:54 AM)WiseMan Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 08:08 AM)macgar32 Wrote:  

(08-23-2019 07:38 AM)mairving Wrote:  Not that rare for a really good team.

It is very rare...

But it is also very rare for a team to only lose 10 games in 3 years as well.

But the main factor in the lack of double digit losses is the fact that we played in C-USA and rarely lost a game.

A 10 point loss on the road to a top 25 team is not a bad loss.

Most of you just won’t give Cal ANY credit will you? If it was CUSA, how do you explain the good OOC wins and the best 4 game stretch (-2 minutes) maybe ever played in NCAA tournament? That team was well coached: very few bad shots, many layups, great team D, low turnovers and no up and down. Steady through the season. DRose didn’t create that Cal did. And for the naysayers, this has NOTHING to do with Penny. I’m confident he will be a Memphis legend if he leaves before fickle Memphis fans turn on him.

And I hated the way Cal left but I recognize a great coaching job (of which recruiting is 60-70% of it) when I see it. It took him longer because of no moneyand tough conference.

no money.

(Insert cockhead gif)

Look at attendance years before Cal came and his 10 years here. MONEY!!

Cal had RC.

'Great coaching' precludes getting popped by the NCAA.

Cal's 'great coaching' brought trubble--not to him of course, just to the players and the schools.

What good is winning if it's all taken away.