I made a tiny mint when DJT was +450 last go-round...

my site FINALLY issued a number...

my guy won't let me bet any more than this...

#bummer

2019/08/11
05:26:30 PM 76323394 I
Specials - Politics
Odds To Win - 2020 Presidential Election
[86596] Donald Trump -150 08/12/2019 (08:00 AM) (Pending)
Straight 450.00 300.00

So I'm understanding you're only allowed to bet $450?

(08-12-2019 06:32 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  I made a tiny mint when DJT was +450 last go-round...

my site FINALLY issued a number...

my guy won't let me bet any more than this...

#bummer

2019/08/11
05:26:30 PM 76323394 I
Specials - Politics
Odds To Win - 2020 Presidential Election
[86596] Donald Trump -150 08/12/2019 (08:00 AM) (Pending)
Straight 450.00 300.00

Interesting that the bookies are seeing a Trump win more than the MSM and pollsters that poll more Dems all the time........

Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

I thought this was going to be about a board bet...

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

This ^^^

With the exception of I am contemplating voting for him this time all while holding my nose and disbelieving that the current state of affairs dictates that I do so to ensure a Dem doesn't get in because they've officially lost they got damn minds.

(08-12-2019 09:09 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I thought this was going to be about a board bet...

I suspect you have a bad taste in your mouth about those..

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

He's not winning easily in the polls right now (but maybe that's a good sign for him). It's the Dems race to lose since his voting bloc is capped.

(08-12-2019 09:44 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

He's not winning easily in the polls right now (but maybe that's a good sign for him). It's the Dems race to lose since his voting bloc is capped.

Keep hanging your dreams on that.. Hey while I have you I got some ocean front property in Arizona that I'll sell you... From the front porch you can see the sea..

(08-12-2019 09:44 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

He's not winning easily in the polls right now (but maybe that's a good sign for him). It's the Dems race to lose since his voting bloc is capped.

So his “cap” last time was ‘no chance’. What’s his voting bloc capped at this time Nostradamus?

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

But are you going to vote against him? Of course you don't need to answer, but that's the question a lot of dems are going to have to ask themselves next november.

(08-12-2019 09:49 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 09:44 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

He's not winning easily in the polls right now (but maybe that's a good sign for him). It's the Dems race to lose since his voting bloc is capped.

So his “cap” last time was ‘no chance’. What’s his voting bloc capped at this time Nostradamus?

Last time Trump had no path to 270 EV. Which explains why he was able to get over 300.

(08-12-2019 06:35 AM)gdunn Wrote:  So I'm understanding you're only allowed to bet $450?

the max allowable on this wager is 300....at -150, that is why it's 450 to win 300...

(08-12-2019 09:44 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

He's not winning easily in the polls right now (but maybe that's a good sign for him). It's the Dems race to lose since his voting bloc is capped.

Considering what happened last time I'd advise to ignore the polls.

(08-12-2019 09:09 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  I thought this was going to be about a board bet...

lol....the lesson of betting with a donk was 'learned' long ago...

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

There are people so dead set against him, while it might be a YUGE electoral college win, it will be by a lot of narrow wins.

I'm beginning to agree that despite not showing as such in the polls yet, the more we hear from the dems, the more it is going to cement Trump as the favorite. Biden is a buffoon and a gaffe machine, that can't go 45 minutes before he starts slurring his words, and pochahontas is a nut.

No one else is even viable at this point. Tulsi ended camila's campaign, mayor pete is cringe and will never eclipse 0% of the black vote, and bernie has been exposed as someone that just regurgitates the same 3 talking points.

I retain the right to change that opinion if Trump follows through with any more gun control in attempt to virtue signal to the dems' outrage, as if he gives them something, they'll be satisfied and won't just come back for more after the next shooting. If he gives in to them on universal background checks, he's done.

(08-12-2019 09:48 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 09:44 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

He's not winning easily in the polls right now (but maybe that's a good sign for him). It's the Dems race to lose since his voting bloc is capped.

Keep hanging your dreams on that.. Hey while I have you I got some ocean front property in Arizona that I'll sell you... From the front porch you can see the sea..

Its the same thing they were saying November 2016. And his negatives are less than they were then.

(08-12-2019 10:19 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 09:44 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

He's not winning easily in the polls right now (but maybe that's a good sign for him). It's the Dems race to lose since his voting bloc is capped.

Considering what happened last time I'd advise to ignore the polls.

William Hill lost their asses back in 2016 because they didnt ignore the polls. They were so lop-sided heavy on Clinton bets that they decided to offer to pay a lot of those off prior to the election at a discount. They would have made a huge profit had they sat tight, instead they had to pay off all of the Trump side, after they had already paid off a lot on the Clinton side, and they lost their ass in the process.

(08-12-2019 10:26 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 10:19 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 09:44 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(08-12-2019 08:52 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Unless the Dems come up with a candidate who can appeal to swing voters, and can avoid constant gaffes and/or ridiculously stupid policy proposals, I think Trump wins easily.

And this is coming from someone who isn't a Repub, didn't vote for Trump last time, and won't vote for him this time, either.

He's not winning easily in the polls right now (but maybe that's a good sign for him). It's the Dems race to lose since his voting bloc is capped.

Considering what happened last time I'd advise to ignore the polls.

William Hill lost their asses back in 2016 because they didnt ignore the polls. They were so lop-sided heavy on Clinton bets that they decided to offer to pay a lot of those off prior to the election at a discount. They would have made a huge profit had they sat tight, instead they had to pay off all of the Trump side, after they had already paid off a lot on the Clinton side, and they lost their ass in the process.

I wasn't even looking at it from a betting aspect since I don't gamble, etc. Thanks for the info though (I had to google William Hill).